Latent Structure of Multi-level Assessments and Predictors of Outcomes in Psychiatric Disorders

July 1, 2020 updated by: Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Inc.

T-1000: Latent Structure of Multi-level Assessments and Predictors of Outcomes in Psychiatric Disorders

In this study the investigators will seek to improve our understanding of how positive and negative valence systems, cognition, and arousal/interoception are inter-related in disorders of mood, substance use, and eating behavior. The investigators will recruit 1000 individuals and use a wide range of assessment tools, neuroimaging measures, blood and microbiome collections and behavioral tasks to complete the baseline and follow-up study visits. Upon completion, the investigators aim to have robust and reliable dimensional measures that quantify these systems and a set of assessments that should be recommended as a clinical tool to enhance outcome prediction for the clinician and assist in determining who will likely benefit from what type of intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Neuroscience has made tremendous progress in understanding the basic neural circuitry that underlies important processes such as attention, memory, and basic emotion processing. Yet, little progress has been made to utilize these insights to apply them to psychiatric populations in order to make clinically meaningful predictions. The connection between psychiatric disorders and their underlying neurobiology has been difficult to establish. The overarching theme of this study is to determine how biological and objective behavioral measures can contribute to improving assessment and treatment of psychiatric patients. The investigators will use the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework as a heuristic approach that integrates neuroscience and psychopathology to study the positive and negative valence systems, cognition and arousal/interoception domains. Within this framework we will study a group of treatment seeking individuals with mental health conditions to determine how dysfunctions of affect, substance use, and eating behavior organize across different levels and whether these latent factors can be used to generate clinically useful prediction.

Using self-report, behavior, physiology, neural circuit, cell, molecule, and gene unit of analysis measures, the investigators propose to enroll 1000 individuals from four different cohorts over 5 years: (1) anxiety and/or depression; (2) eating problems; (3) substance use problems; and (4) healthy controls. Each individual will undergo a multi-level assessment that consists of (a) a standardized diagnostic assessment, (b) self-report questionnaires, (c) behavioral tasks, (d) physiological measurements, (e) structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and EEG, (f) biomarker and microbiome assessments, (g) blood to derive induced pluripotent stem cells, (h) and genetic and epigenetic assessments. These individuals will be followed up for one year and will be re-assessed using a multi-domain assessment of functioning, which will include: (a) symptom severity and duration, (b) subjective well-being, (c) psychosocial function, (c) occupational function, (d) physical health, (e) utilization of mental health resources (treatment), and (f) compliance with treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1271

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74136
        • Laureate Institute for Brain Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Community Sample

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Referred or seeking treatment, as defined by answering yes to "have you sought help for problems with":

    1. Anxiety and/or depressive symptoms
    2. Problems related to substance use
    3. Problems related to eating behavior

  2. Screened positive for problems in (1) as indicated by:

    1. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) ≥ 10 and/or Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) ≥ 8.
    2. Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10) score > 2
    3. Eating Disorder Screen (SCOFF) score ≥ 2
  3. Have a body mass index between 17 to 38 kg/m²
  4. Able to provide written informed consent.
  5. Have sufficient proficiency in English language to understand and complete interviews, questionnaires, and all other study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. No telephone or easy access to telephone.
  2. Has a history of unstable liver or renal insufficiency; glaucoma; significant and unstable cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, or metabolic disturbance; or any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation not be in the best interest (e.g., compromise the well-being) of the subject or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments.
  3. A positive test for drugs of abuse, including alcohol (breath test), cocaine, marijuana, opiates, amphetamines, methamphetamines, phencyclidine, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, methadone, and oxycodone.

  4. Has any of the following DSM-V disorders:

    1. Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders
    2. Bipolar and Related Disorders
    3. Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
    4. Antisocial Personality Disorder
  5. Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury or other neurocognitive disorder
  6. Active suicidal ideation with intent or plan.
  7. Change in the dose or prescription of a medication within the 6 weeks before enrolling in the study that could affect brain functioning
  8. Prescription of a medication outside of the accepted range, as determined by the best clinical practices and current research.
  9. Taking drugs that affect the fMRI hemodynamic response (e.g., methylphenidate, acetazolamide, excessive caffeine intake > 1000 mg/day)
  10. MRI contraindications
  11. Unwillingness or inability to complete any of the major aspects of the study protocol
  12. Non-correctable vision or hearing problems

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Depression and Anxiety Disorders

350 subjects who screen positive for anxiety or depressive symptoms on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) ≥ 10 and/or Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) ≥ 8.

Interventions: (1) standardized diagnostic assessment, (2) self-report questionnaires, (3) behavioral tasks, (4) physiological measurements, 5) structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging and EEG, (6) biomarker and microbiome assessments, (h) blood to derive induced pluripotent stem cells, (8) and genetic and epigenetic assessments.
Other: physiological measurements
Behavioral: standardized diagnostic assessment
Behavioral: self-report questionnaires
Behavioral: behavioral tasks
Other: structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging and EEG
Other: biomarker and microbiome assessments
Other: blood to derive induced pluripotent stem cells
Other: genetic and epigenetic assessments
Eating Disorders

350 subjects who screen positive for problems related to eating behavior on the Eating Disorder Screen (SCOFF), score ≥ 2.

Interventions: (1) standardized diagnostic assessment, (2) self-report questionnaires, (3) behavioral tasks, (4) physiological measurements, 5) structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging and EEG, (6) biomarker and microbiome assessments, (h) blood to derive induced pluripotent stem cells, (8) and genetic and epigenetic assessments.
Other: physiological measurements
Behavioral: standardized diagnostic assessment
Behavioral: self-report questionnaires
Behavioral: behavioral tasks
Other: structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging and EEG
Other: biomarker and microbiome assessments
Other: blood to derive induced pluripotent stem cells
Other: genetic and epigenetic assessments
Substance Use Disorders

350 subjects who screen positive for problems related to substance use on the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10), score > 2.

Interventions: (1) standardized diagnostic assessment, (2) self-report questionnaires, (3) behavioral tasks, (4) physiological measurements, 5) structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging and EEG, (6) biomarker and microbiome assessments, (h) blood to derive induced pluripotent stem cells, (8) and genetic and epigenetic assessments.
Other: physiological measurements
Behavioral: standardized diagnostic assessment
Behavioral: self-report questionnaires
Behavioral: behavioral tasks
Other: structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging and EEG
Other: biomarker and microbiome assessments
Other: blood to derive induced pluripotent stem cells
Other: genetic and epigenetic assessments
Healthy Controls

150 subjects who do not screen positive for anxiety and depression symptoms or problems related to eating behavior and/or substance use.

Interventions: (1) standardized diagnostic assessment, (2) self-report questionnaires, (3) behavioral tasks, (4) physiological measurements, 5) structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging and EEG, (6) biomarker and microbiome assessments, (h) blood to derive induced pluripotent stem cells, (8) and genetic and epigenetic assessments.
Other: physiological measurements
Behavioral: standardized diagnostic assessment
Behavioral: self-report questionnaires
Behavioral: behavioral tasks
Other: structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging and EEG
Other: biomarker and microbiome assessments
Other: blood to derive induced pluripotent stem cells
Other: genetic and epigenetic assessments

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Clinical Diagnosis
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year
Test the predictive effects of endophenotypes (genetic, imaging and behavioral factors) on clinical diagnosis at baseline compared to one year later using the Mini International Psychiatric Interview in patients and healthy controls
Baseline and 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Inc.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of California, San Diego
University of Oklahoma
Rutgers University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 6, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 18, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 21, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 1, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2014-002 (Other Identifier: Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on physiological measurements

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings