Cyclization of Motor Cortex Stimulation
The Relationship Between Cyclizing Stimulation and Effective Stimulation During Motor Cortex Stimulation
Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is a form of brain stimulation for patients with neuropathic pain not responsive to medication. An electrode is placed on the surface of the brain and connected to a programmable battery in the chest.
The strength of stimulation can be individually adjusted by changing the voltage of stimulation. A too high voltage will produce side effects (e.g. seizures) while a too low voltage will not provide pain control.
The aim of this study is to analyze the optimal stimulation timing parameters in patients already implanted with MCS and have received good pain relief. The investigators wish to cyclize on/off MCS in order to save the battery life of the stimulator and also decrease stimulus habituation. The investigators hope to determine these timing parameters while maintaining optimal pain relief.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 4E3
- The Vancouver General Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patient more than 18 years of age
- Chronic neuropathic pain effectively treated with motor cortex stimulation
- Stable medication during the trial
- Willing and able to comply with the study protocol and to return per the follow-up visit schedule and able to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of an active disruptive psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact the perception of pain, compliance to intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as determined by the investigator
- Technical malfunction of the MCS device
- History of seizures
- Unable to provide informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Original Setting- MCS 30 min off/0 min off
Patients at baseline with their original MCS settings: on 30 minutes, off 0 minutes in any single half-hour.
|
|
|
Experimental: MCS 25 min on/5 min off
Patient MCS settings programmed to: on 25 minutes, off 5 minutes in any single half-hour.
|
|
|
Experimental: MCS 20 min on/10 min off
Patient MCS settings programmed to: on 20 minutes, off 10 minutes in any single half-hour.
|
|
|
Experimental: MCS 15 min on/15 min off
Patient MCS settings programmed to: on 15 minutes, off 15 minutes in any single hour.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Change in Pain measured on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with different stimulation settings
Time Frame: At the End of each trial period, typically 14 days after change in stimulation settings
|
At the End of each trial period, typically 14 days after change in stimulation settings
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Quality of Life assessment with the SF-36 questionnaire
Time Frame: At the end of each trial period, typically at 14 days after change in stimulation settings
|
At the end of each trial period, typically at 14 days after change in stimulation settings
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Pain assessment with the McGill pain questionnaire to record impact of pain
Time Frame: At the end of each trial period, typically 14 days after change in stimulation setting
|
At the end of each trial period, typically 14 days after change in stimulation setting
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Tsubokawa T, Katayama Y, Yamamoto T, Hirayama T, Koyama S. Treatment of thalamic pain by chronic motor cortex stimulation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Jan;14(1):131-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb04058.x.
- Tsubokawa T, Katayama Y, Yamamoto T, Hirayama T, Koyama S. Chronic motor cortex stimulation for the treatment of central pain. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1991;52:137-9. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9160-6_37.
- Peyron R, Garcia-Larrea L, Deiber MP, Cinotti L, Convers P, Sindou M, Mauguiere F, Laurent B. Electrical stimulation of precentral cortical area in the treatment of central pain: electrophysiological and PET study. Pain. 1995 Sep;62(3):275-286. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00211-V.
- Lima MC, Fregni F. Motor cortex stimulation for chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Neurology. 2008 Jun 10;70(24):2329-37. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000314649.38527.93.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- H15-01420
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Neuropathic Pain
-
NCT07301632RecruitingChronic Neuropathic Pain
-
NCT02100046CompletedNeuropathic Traumatic Pain | Pain NRS ≥ 4 | Peripheral Neuropathic Pain | Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic Questionnaire (DN4) ≥ 4
-
NCT00407511CompletedPostherpetic Neuralgia (PHN) | Chemotherapy Induced Neuropathic Pain | Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (DPN) | HIV-related Neuropathic Pain (HIV)
-
NCT07396129Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07154056Recruiting
-
NCT07285018RecruitingDiabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
-
NCT07377721RecruitingDiabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
-
NCT07159243Not yet recruitingDiabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
-
NCT07187986CompletedNeuropathic Pain in Cancer
-
NCT01582646TerminatedPostthoracotomy Pain | Postthoracoscopy Neuropathic Pain
Clinical Trials on motor cortex stimulation (Change of Stimulation Timing)
-
NCT03486769Completed
-
NCT00462566CompletedComplex Regional Pain Syndrome | Neuropathic Pain | Facial Pain | Phantom Limb Pain | Brachial Plexus Avulsion | Stump Pain | Deafferentation Pain
-
NCT04165876CompletedAcute Pain | Neuroplasticity | Brain Modulation | Somatosensory Function
-
NCT00159172Unknown
-
NCT06263972Not yet recruiting
-
NCT02120326CompletedChronic Migraine as Defined by Criteria of International Headache Society (IHS)
-
NCT02321566TerminatedGlossopharyngeal Neuralgia | Trigeminal Neuralgia (Burchiel Type I) | Trigeminal Neuralgia (Burchiel Type II) | Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain | Trigeminal Deafferentation Pain | Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (Types I and II, Involving the Upper Extremity) | Upper Extremity Pain Due to Deafferentation of the Cervical Spine | Central Pain Syndromes
-
NCT03278184Completed
-
NCT01554332UnknownNeuropathic Pain | Facial Pain | Post-stroke Pain | Brachial Plexus Avulsion | Phantom Limb Pain of the Upper Extremities