- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06263972
Comparison of the Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) of the Primary Motor Cortex (M1) or the Prefrontal Cortex Combined With Aerobic Activity for Alleviation of Fibromyalgia Symptoms.
Comparison of the Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) of the Primary Motor Cortex (M1) or the Prefrontal Cortex Combined With Aerobic Activity for Alleviation of Fibromyalgia Symptoms and on Improving Self-Regulation and Quality of Life- a Randomized, Double Blinded Controlled Prospective Study
The goal of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of treating fibromyalgia using combination of electrical stimulation with aerobic activity.
Participants will be randomly assigned to stimulation in a ratio of 1:1:1. 120 participants (40 in each group). The therapeutic course will include moderate aerobic physical activity (at 60% of the target heart rate adjusted for age) 3 times a week for 4 weeks (a week of adjustment, and 3 weeks of treatment), along with low current electrical stimulation for 3 weeks.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Fibromyalgia is a disorder of unknown origin that causes widespread pain, fatigue, sleep disorders, cognitive disorders, depression and anxiety. Today, the treatments for fibromyalgia are limited in their effectiveness in most cases. Previous works have demonstrated that the self-regulation ability among those dealing with fibromyalgia is impaired, and their quality of life is poor.
Therapy using low current electrical stimulation is considered an effective, safe and non-invasive means of treating various disorders including treatment of depression, neurological rehabilitation and various pain syndromes.
A number of works have demonstrated the effectiveness of treating fibromyalgia using stimulation using low electrical current , and it has also been demonstrated that a combination of electrical stimulation with aerobic activity improved the results, together with each of the treatments separately. There are several areas that can be stimulated including the primary motor area (M1) and the prefrontal area , however, the studies performed were limited to a relatively small number of subjects, and no direct comparison was made between the different stimulation locations.
For the study, male and female patients dealing with fibromyalgia will be recruited from the hospital clinics or those who will be referred by the attending physician, or will respond to recruitment notices, in total we intend to recruit 120 participants (40 in each group). The patients will be randomly assigned to real stimulation for each of the areas or to blood stimulation in a ratio of 1:1:1. The therapeutic course will include moderate aerobic physical activity (at 60% of the target heart rate adjusted for age) 3 times a week for 4 weeks (a week of adjustment, and 3 weeks of treatment), along with low current electrical stimulation for 3 weeks.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Shahak Yariv
- Phone Number: 972-4-6495590
- Email: yariv_sh@clalit.org.il
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed Fibromyalgia
- Pain scale level of 4 or higher
- Fail to achieve adequate pain relief with Fibromyalgia treatments
- stable Fibromyalgia treatment for at least 4 weeks.
- Ability to perform aerobic exercise
Exclusion Criteria:
- Other Causes of pain
- Psychotic disorder
- Severe Depression
- Cognitive disorder
- Drug or alcohol abuse in the last 6 months
- pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Direct Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex (M1) Combined With Aerobic Activity.
low current electrical stimulation to Motor cortex for 3 weeks.
|
The therapeutic course will include moderate aerobic physical activity (at 60% of the target heart rate adjusted for age) 3 times a week for 4 weeks (a week of adjustment, and 3 weeks of treatment), along with low current electrical stimulation to Motor cortex for 3 weeks.
Aerobic physical activity (at 60% of the target heart rate adjusted for age) 3 times a week for 4 weeks (a week of adjustment, and 3 weeks of treatment),
|
|
Active Comparator: Direct Stimulation the Prefrontal Cortex Combined With Aerobic Activity
with low current electrical stimulation to Prefrontal cortex for 3 weeks.
|
Aerobic physical activity (at 60% of the target heart rate adjusted for age) 3 times a week for 4 weeks (a week of adjustment, and 3 weeks of treatment),
The therapeutic course will include moderate aerobic physical activity (at 60% of the target heart rate adjusted for age) 3 times a week for 4 weeks (a week of adjustment, and 3 weeks of treatment), along with low current electrical stimulation to prefrontal cortex for 3 weeks.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Shame Stimulation Combined With Aerobic Activity
Shame low current electrical stimulation to cortex for 3 weeks.
|
Aerobic physical activity (at 60% of the target heart rate adjusted for age) 3 times a week for 4 weeks (a week of adjustment, and 3 weeks of treatment),
The therapeutic course will include moderate aerobic physical activity (at 60% of the target heart rate adjusted for age) 3 times a week for 4 weeks (a week of adjustment, and 3 weeks of treatment), along with shame low current electrical stimulation to cortex for 3 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Study objectives: • Comparing the effectiveness of direct electric current stimulation between the two stimulus areas Numeric pain rating scale.
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Study objectives: • Comparing the effectiveness of direct electric current stimulation (tDCS) between the two stimulus areas and in relation to blood stimulation. Based on: Numeric pain rating scale (score range from 1 to 10) |
3 months
|
|
Study objectives: • Comparing the effectiveness of direct electric current stimulation (tDCS) between the two stimulus areas and in relation Adult sensory profile test Raw score.
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Study objectives: • Comparing the effectiveness of direct electric current stimulation (tDCS) between the two stimulus areas and in relation to blood stimulation. Based on: Adult sensory profile test Raw score |
3 months
|
|
Study objectives: • Comparing the effectiveness of direct electric current stimulation between the two stimulus areas and in relation to The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score.
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Study objectives: • Comparing the effectiveness of direct electric current stimulation (tDCS) between the two stimulus areas and in relation to The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score. Based on: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score |
3 months
|
|
Study objectives: • Comparing the effectiveness of direct electric current stimulation between the two stimulus areas and in relation to Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Study objectives: • Comparing the effectiveness of direct electric current stimulation (tDCS) between the two stimulus areas and in relation to blood stimulation. Based on: The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale |
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0168-21EMC
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Fibromyalgia
-
Ionclinics & Deionic SLHospital Clínico Universitario de ValenciaNot yet recruitingFibromyalgia (FM)Spain
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruiting
-
Selcuk UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la...CompletedFibromyalgia (FM)Spain
-
Istanbul Gelisim UniversityBahçeşehir UniversityCompleted
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedFibromyalgia SyndromeTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of UtahRecruitingFibromyalgia (FM)United States
-
María Catalina Osuna PérezActive, not recruitingFibromyalgia SyndromeSpain
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedFibromyalgia | Fibromyalgia Syndrome | Fibromyalgia (FM)Turkey (Türkiye)
Clinical Trials on Direct Stimulation to Motor Cortex
-
University Hospital, GrenobleCompletedChronic Migraine as Defined by Criteria of International Headache Society (IHS)France
-
Catholic University, ItalyMedtronicCompleted
-
Seoul National University HospitalRusk Rehabilitation HospitalRecruitingStroke | Rehabilitation | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation | Motor RecoveryKorea, Republic of
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityDalhousie UniversityCompletedComplex Regional Pain Syndrome | Neuropathic Pain | Facial Pain | Phantom Limb Pain | Brachial Plexus Avulsion | Stump Pain | Deafferentation PainCanada
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedStrokeKorea, Republic of
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthRecruitingAutism Spectrum Disorder | Motor ActivityCanada
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUnknownParkinson DiseaseFrance
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityTerminatedGlossopharyngeal Neuralgia | Trigeminal Neuralgia (Burchiel Type I) | Trigeminal Neuralgia (Burchiel Type II) | Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain | Trigeminal Deafferentation Pain | Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (Types I and II, Involving the Upper Extremity) | Upper Extremity Pain Due to Deafferentation... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Aalborg UniversityDanish National Research FoundationCompletedAcute Pain | Neuroplasticity | Brain Modulation | Somatosensory FunctionDenmark
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedPain, PostoperativeEgypt, United Kingdom