Mechanisms of Stimulation for Pain Alleviation (M-SPA)

September 26, 2025 updated by: Jennifer Hah, Stanford University
This is a mechanistic randomized controlled trial of patients with chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) in the lower back, pelvis, and lower extremities, randomized to conventional medical management (CMM) or combined CMM and peripheral nerve stimulation therapy (PNS+CMM). Our goal is to compare treatment outcomes and trial response rate across the control and interventional device groups.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

148

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Recruiting
        • Stanford University
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jennifer Hah, MD, MS
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria for study participants

Adults aged 18 or older with clinically diagnosed unilateral CNP in the lower back, pelvis, or lower extremities, defined (per IASP classification) as persistent or recurrent neuropathic pain caused by a peripheral nerve lesion, history of a plausible nerve trauma, pain onset in temporal relation to the trauma, and pain distribution within the innervation territory of a peripheral nerve (or nerves).14 Negative and positive sensory symptoms or signs must be compatible with the innervation territory of the affected nerve. Can be post-traumatic, post-surgical, nerve compression, nerve ischemia, peripheral nerve injury, painful scar, nerve entrapment, mononeuropathy with or without loss of motor function

Patients enrolled in this study must already have been referred for or have an existing order for PNS therapy (either Nalu or SPR SPRINT), prior to consent and enrollment in this study, as part of their routine medical care. Patients cannot receive a referral for PNS device as part of the study procedures.

Positive response (at least 50% pain relief) to diagnostic nerve block(s) at the suspected site(s) of CNP.

Chronic (at least 6 months duration), intractable peripheral neuropathic pain; any nociceptive pain must be less prominent than the neuropathic pian.

Fluent in English writing, reading, and speaking

Ability and willingness to complete online assessments

Williness to refrain from physical activity for at least 7 days post-lead placement.

Willingness to refrain from physical activity or exercise causing muscle and/or joint soreness for 48 hours prior to QST, illicit drugs (marijuana) for 12 hours, as-needed (PRN) pain medications (e.g., NSAIDs, acetaminophen, opioids) for 12 hours prior to QST, and alcohol and nicotine on the day of QST prior to testing*

Exclusion Criteria:

Conditions causing inability to complete assessments (education, cognitive ability, mental status, medical status)

Active cancer diagnosis, active malignant neoplasm (metastatic or local) or evidence of paraneoplastic syndrome

Painful polyneuropathy (e.g., metabolic, autoimmune, familial, infectious disease, environmental toxins, treatment with neurotoxic drug)

Chronic central neuropathic pain (e.g., spinal cord injury, brain injury, multiple sclerosis)

Peripheral vascular disease

Diabetic neuropathy

Another pain diagnosis affecting the CNP site that could interfere with study procedures, accurate reporting and/or could confound evaluation of study endpoints (e.g., post-herpetic neuralgia)

Other active implantable devices (e.g., implantable cardioverter defibrillator, spinal cord stimulator, dorsal root ganglion stimulator, sacral nerve stimulator, deep brain stimulator, intrathecal pump)

Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planning to conceive

Systemic infection or local infection at the anticipated PNS implant site

Immunocompromised state

Coagulation disorder, bleeding diathesis, platelet dysfunction, active anticoagulation

Interventional procedure and/or surgery to treat CNP in the last 30 days (subjects should be enrolled 30 days after last procedure, for prior ablative treatment must be enrolled at least 3 months after last procedure)

Untreated substance use disorder

Participating in another clinical trial with an active treatment arm

Numbness or loss of sensation at the bilateral thumbnails, peripheral neuropathy in the hands, circulatory or sensory problem in the hands*

Participants with a history of Raynaud's Syndrome*

Participants with SBP ≥150 and/or DBP ≥100*

*QST Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria. Participants can still be enrolled iif they have the QST-only exclusionary criteria have the QST-only exclusionary criteria, but QST will be modified based on responses

Additional Exclusion Criteria for Subjects receiving PET/MRI and PET/CT imaging at Stanford:

Prior radiation exposure of >2 rem total within the last 12 months

Standard contraindications that would preclude MRI including pacemakers or other electronic implants, metal foreign objects or fragments in the eye or body, and aneurysm clips.

Claustrophobia

Inability to understand and communicate with the investigators to complete the study related questionnaires

Females with positive pregnancy test.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional Medical Management (CMM) ONLY
CMM-Only participants will receive conventional medical management for the duration of their time in the study.
Experimental: Peripheral Nerve Stimulation + Conventional Medical Management (PNS+CMM)
CMM-Only participants will receive conventional medical management for the duration of their time in the study.
This trial studies 2 FDA approved peripheral nerve stimulation devices that may reduce pain by sending electrical pulses to the nerve. The SPR SPRINT PNS System, a matchbox-sized, battery-powered wearable stimulator that uses a Mircrolead to deliver stimulation for pain relief. There is a small wireless hand-held remote that is used to activate/ adjust intensity of stimulation. Stimulation delivered by this device may interrupt pain signals and increase non-pain signals. The SPR SPRINT device is used for 60 days before the percutaneous Microlead(s) are removed. The Nalu PNS System, a dime-sized micro-implantable pulse generator (IPG) leveraging advanced microelectronics. The micro-IPG is powered by an externally worn therapy disc via radiofrequency worn over the IPG site with an adhesive clip applied to the skin or a relief belt. The device is remote-controlled by patients via an app.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment Response: defined as 50% relief of average pain intensity at the area of lower back, pelvic, or lower extremity CNP. We will compare the means of a three-day diary of numeric rating scale of pain (NRS) intensity scores (0-10 scale)
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 3
We will compare the mean of a three-day diary of numeric rating scale of pain (NRS) intensity scores (0-10 scale) at baseline to the mean of a three-day diary of NRS scores at 3 months comparing all participants randomized to CMM vs. PNS+CMM.
Baseline to Month 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trial Response Rate
Time Frame: Baseline to 15 days
Defined as 50% relief of average pain intensity comparing the mean of a three-day diary of NRS scores at baseline to the mean of a three-day diary of NRS scores at 15 days comparing participants randomized to CMM vs. PNS+CMM. This outcome will be assessed either 15 days after baseline assessments among participants randomized to CMM, 15 days after Nalu PNS trial lead placement, or 15 days after SPR Sprint PNS microlead placement.
Baseline to 15 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Remission Rate
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months
Average pain intensity les s than 2.5 out of 10 (at the CNP site) at 3 months measured over three days
From baseline to 3 months
Minimum Treatment Response Rate
Time Frame: From baseline to 3-month followup
30% relief comparing average pain intensity at baseline at the area of lower extremity CNP to scores at 3 months. Scores will be averaged over 3 days pre- and post-surgery.
From baseline to 3-month followup
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptoms
Time Frame: MONTHLY from baseline to 3-month followup
Measured by the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) with a total score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater neuropathic pain intensity. Measured monthly to 3 months.
MONTHLY from baseline to 3-month followup
Change in Pain Distribution
Time Frame: From baseline to 3-month followup
Total number of affected sites measured at 3 months on the Michigan Body Map
From baseline to 3-month followup
Change in Pain Interference
Time Frame: From baseline to 3-month followup
Mean score of pain interference items rated on a 0-10 scale at 3 months.
From baseline to 3-month followup
Change in Physical Functioning
Time Frame: From baseline to 3-month followup
Measured by PROMIS Physical Functioning Short Form 6b at 3 months, rating difficulty in basic physical activities on a 1-5 scale from most to least difficult
From baseline to 3-month followup
Change in Sleep
Time Frame: From baseline to 3-month followup
Measured by PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 6a at 3 months, rating sleep quality measures on a 1-5 scale from very good to very poor
From baseline to 3-month followup
Change in Pain Catastrophizing
Time Frame: From baseline to 3-month followup
Measured by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Short Form 6 (PCS) score at 3 months, rating participant's emotional responses to pain from "not at all" to "all the time"
From baseline to 3-month followup
Minimum Patient Improvement Rate
Time Frame: From baseline to 3-month followup
Measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), rating change to overall patient pain status with 7 responses from 1-very much improved to 7-very much worse. Defined as a response of 1,2, or 3 at 3 months
From baseline to 3-month followup
Longitudinal Change in Mood - Depression
Time Frame: Through study completion, up to 1 year
Measured MONTHLY by PROMIS Depression 4A, rating depressive symptoms on a 5-level scale from "never" to "always"
Through study completion, up to 1 year
Longitudinal Change in Mood - Anxiety
Time Frame: Through study completion, up to 1 year
Measured MONTHLY by PROMIS Anxiety 4A, rating anxious symptoms on a 5-level scale from "never" to "always"
Through study completion, up to 1 year
Longitudinal Change in Mood - PHQ9
Time Frame: Through study completion, up to 1 year
Measured MONTHLY by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), rating depressive and anxious habits on a 4-level scale from "not at all" to "nearly every day"
Through study completion, up to 1 year
Change in health-related quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3-month followup
Measured by the PROMIS-Preference (PROPr) score serving as a measure of health-related QOL calculated from previous measures: PROMIS Cognitive Function, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, and sleep disturbance assessed at 3 months; ranked on a 0-1 scale where 0 is the utility of being dead and 1 is the utility of full health.
From baseline to 3-month followup
Change in Opioid Dose
Time Frame: From baseline to 3-month followup
Change in daily OME use from baseline to use at 3 months. Comparing the average use over three days at baseline to average use over three days at 3 months to account for as-needed dosing. In addition, we will compare average daily OME as determined by State PDMP prescription at baseline and at 3 months.
From baseline to 3-month followup

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Hah, MD, MS., Stanford University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 26, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 76560
  • RM1NS128956-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Neuropathic Pain

Clinical Trials on Conventional Care Regimen

Subscribe