Ultrasound-guided Pudendal Nerve Block in Children: A Descriptive Study of Feasibility

July 13, 2015 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Objective: Description of a new transperineal technique of pudendal nerve block (PNB), under ultrasound-guidance.

Methods : Successive inclusions after parental consent of 60 children undergoing perineal surgery under general anesthesia and pudendal nerve block. Data were collected from induction of anesthesia to second post-operative day (24 hrs. after admission in recovery room). Ease of PNB achievement was the primary objective evaluated. Efficiency in preoperative and postoperative period was also reported.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

After obtaining parental consent, children aged 1-15 years, physical status score I-III, requiring general anesthesia associated with bilateral pudendal nerve block (PNB) for elective perineal surgery in the investigators' paediatric surgery unit, were successively included. Exclusion criteria were any contraindication to general or loco regional anesthesia, and physical status score IV-V. Management of general anesthesia was standardized. Propofol and/or sevoflurane were used for induction, in association with a continuous infusion of remifentanil at 1µg/kg/min during two minutes. After this delay, airway control was assured through insertion of a tracheal tube or a laryngeal mask. Maintenance of anesthesia was then achieved with Sevoflurane (1.2 MAC) in a mix 02/N2 and remifentanil 0.05 µg/kg/min. Mechanical ventilation parameters were adapted to obtain a normal End-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) (28-34 mmHg). Baseline values of blood pressure and heart rate under general anesthesia without nociceptive stimulation were measured.Ultrasound guided pudendal nerve block was then performed. For each block, data about sonographic identification of anatomical structures, visualization of needle and local anaesthetic spread were collected. The response to nerve stimulation, puncture complications and duration of the procedure were also noted. During perineal operative time, a rise up in blood pressure or in heart rate more than 20% compared to baseline values was considered as a PNB failure. Analgesia was then provided by an incremental increase of remifentanil, to obtain a return to baseline hemodynamic parameters. The maximum rate of infusion of remifentanil was collected. All patients received intravenous post-operative analgesia by acetaminophen 15 mg/kg and ketoprofen 1mg/kg. Rescue analgesia by IV nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg was administered in recovery room if necessary. Post-operative analgesia by oral acetaminophen associated with ibuprofen, and rescue analgesia with oral tramadol were prescribed. Data on post-operative analgesia were collected up to 24h after recovery room admission.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
196

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • University Hospital Lapeyronie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 11 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient hospitalized in pediatric surgery unit for elective perineal surgery to which the use of pudendal block is relevant and current practice.
  2. patient physical status score I-III classification
  3. Patient of both sexes
  4. Patient aged 1 year to 15 years of age
  5. Patient whose parents have given their informed consent.
  6. Patient affiliated to a social security scheme or of such a regime

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient who participated in the previous month to a therapeutic trial or currently included in another test
  2. Patient with bleeding disorders
  3. Patient with infection (Fasciocutaneous subcutaneous) at the puncture area
  4. Patient with allergies to local anesthetics
  5. patients with a contraindication to general anesthesia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: perineal technic
Procedure: Ultrasound guided transperineal pudendal nerve block
Children under general anesthesia were positioned supine, flexed legs and balls of the feet joined. A 12 MegaHertz (MHz) (38 mm) ultrasound probe was positioned on a horizontal axis passing through the ischial tuberosity, previously palpated.The probe was then moved medially on the axis, until the rectum appeared. Pudendal artery was identified if possible, using colour Doppler. The needle (22 Ga, 50 mm) was then introduced at the middle of the superior edge of the probe, in an out-of-plane approach. Tip of the needle was identified by direct vision, through displacement of adjacent anatomical structures or with saline injection. Nerve stimulation was started after placement of the tip of needle in the ischiorectal fossa, before local anaesthetic injection. After a negative aspiration test, a mix of Ropivacaine 2 % and clonidine 0.2µg/kg was injected in the ischiorectal fossa under ultrasound guidance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quality of visualization (with specific scale: good, medium, bad quality) of local anesthetic injection within the ischiorectale pit under ultrasound.
Time Frame: intraoperative
intraoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quality of visualization (with specific scale: good, medium, bad quality) of target anatomical structures, of needle tip
Time Frame: intraoperative
intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Montpellier

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Isabelle IG GAUDET-FERRAND, MD, Department of Anesthesia Resuscitation at the Hospital Lapeyronie in Montpellier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 13, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 14, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 14, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 13, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 9397
  • 2014-A00499-38 (Registry Identifier: ID-RCB)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pudendal Nerve Block

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound guided transperineal pudendal nerve block

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings