Heidelberg Edge Perimetry (HEP) Detecting Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects (HEP)

August 15, 2019 updated by: L. Jay Katz MD, Wills Eye

Validation and Reproducibility of the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter in the Detection of Visual Field Defects in Glaucomatous Patients

The purpose of this study is to compare standard automated perimetry (SAP) using the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter (HEP) to the Octopus Visual Field (OVF) analyzer and determine test-retest reliability of both parameters in detecting glaucomatous visual field losses. This study will also investigate novel imaging parameters of the optic nerve head and new automated structure-function reports.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Each participant undergo the following tests:

  1. Standard ophthalmic examination (usual care): Best-corrected visual acuity, biomicroscopy (look at front of eye), intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldman applanation tonometry, central corneal thickness measurement and fundoscopy (look at back of eye).
  2. Octopus Visual Field (OVF) Analyzer using G-top strategy recording mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD).
  3. Heidelberg Edge Perimeter (HEP) standard automated perimetry (SAP) using advanced staircase thresholding algorithm (ASTA).
  4. Spectralis optical coherence tomography (OCT) using glaucoma module premium edition (GMPE) software to measure minimum rim width (MRW) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in 6 sectors (superior nasal, superior temporal, inferior nasal, inferior temporal, nasal and temporal) in the retina.

Order of HEP SAP III and OVF, and order of the eye tested (right vs. left) if both eyes of patients meet inclusion criteria will be randomized. Patients with glaucoma will be randomly chosen and asked to return in 3 to 6 months for repeat HEP and OVF testing.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
115

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years.
  • Best corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better in the tested eye.
  • Spherical refraction within ±5.0 D, and cylinder correction within ±3.0 D.
  • History of glaucoma, defined as:
  • Characteristic of glaucomatous disc damage: (local narrowing, notching, or absence of the neuroretinal rim in the absence of disc pallor elsewhere).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any condition preventing adequate examination of the pupil or visual field testing (e.g. ptosis, dense corneal opacities or lens opacities);
  • Active infection of the anterior or posterior segments of the eye;
  • Any intraocular surgical or laser procedure within the previous 4 weeks;
  • Participants taking a medication known to affect visual field sensitivity, a coexisting intraocular disease affecting visual field, or a problem other than glaucoma affecting color vision will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Glaucoma Subjects
Subjects with glaucoma were recruited based on characteristic glaucomatous disc damage and visual field changes. They will perform visual field with Heidelberg Edge Perimeter and Octopus visual field. Optical Coherence Tomography will image the retinal nerve fiber layer.
Diagnostic test: Heidelberg Edge Perimeter
HEP measures peripheral vision
Other Names:
  • HEP
Diagnostic test: Octopus Visual Field
OVF measures peripheral vision
Other Names:
  • OVF
Diagnostic test: Optical Coherence Tomography
OCT measures retinal nerve fiber layer thickness
Other Names:
  • OCT
Experimental: Healthy Controls
Subjects that do not have glaucoma and are recruited for testing will perform visual field with Heidelberg Edge Perimeter and Octopus visual field. Optical Coherence Tomography will image the retinal nerve fiber layer.
Diagnostic test: Heidelberg Edge Perimeter
HEP measures peripheral vision
Other Names:
  • HEP
Diagnostic test: Octopus Visual Field
OVF measures peripheral vision
Other Names:
  • OVF
Diagnostic test: Optical Coherence Tomography
OCT measures retinal nerve fiber layer thickness
Other Names:
  • OCT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation Coefficient Between HEP and OVF Mean Deviation (MD)
Time Frame: Baseline visit, 1 hour
Pearson's correlation coefficient between Heidelberg Edge Perimeter (HEP) and Octopus Visual Field (OVF) Mean Deviation (MD) for glaucoma patients and controls to determine if HEP can detect glaucoma as well as OVF. The closer the values of both parameters for both machines, the better comparable the two machines are to each other in detecting glaucoma.
Baseline visit, 1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Repeatability of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Parameters
Time Frame: Month 6 visit, 1 hour
A subgroup of participants were randomly selected to return at 3 and 6 months for repeat testing. Not all eyes were included. Repeatability of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to consistently detect minimum rim width (MRW) global thickness will be assessed by Pearson's interclass correlation coefficients (ICC). A larger ICC indicates measurements have greater repeatability. Greater than 0.75 indicated excellent repeatability; 0.40 to 0.75 indicated fair to good, and less than 0.40 indicated poor reliability.
Month 6 visit, 1 hour
Correlations Between Structure-function Automated Report and Clinical Impression
Time Frame: Baseline visit, 1 hour
Heidelberg Edge Perimeter (HEP) Visual Field (VF) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) printouts from only the glaucoma subgroup were assessed. Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) and Minimum Rim Width (MRW) from SD OCT and HEP VF automated reports were compared to the clinical interpretations by 3 glaucoma specialists.
Baseline visit, 1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wills Eye

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Leslie J Katz, MD, Wills Eye Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 30, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 18, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 15, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 13-340

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings