Treadmill Cardiovascular Safety Study of Erenumab (AMG 334)

July 27, 2018 updated by: Amgen

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Effect of AMG 334 on Exercise Time During a Treadmill Test in Subjects With Stable Angina

A phase 2a, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adults with stable angina to evaluate the effect of erenumab (AMG 334) compared to placebo on exercise time during an exercise treadmill test.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
89

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Bulgaria
      • Haskovo, Bulgaria, 6300
        • Research Site
      • Sofia, Bulgaria, 1431
        • Research Site
      • Sofia, Bulgaria, 1407
        • Research Site
      • Sofia, Bulgaria, 1606
        • Research Site
  • Czechia
      • Brandys nad Labem, Czechia, 250 01
        • Research Site
      • Chomutov, Czechia, 430 02
        • Research Site
      • Praha 4, Czechia, 140 21
        • Research Site
      • Pribram VIII, Czechia, 261 01
        • Research Site
  • Latvia
      • Riga, Latvia, 1038
        • Research Site
  • New Zealand
      • Christchurch, New Zealand, 8011
        • Research Site
      • Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand, 1023
        • Research Site
  • Poland
      • Krakow, Poland, 31-202
        • Research Site
      • Lodz, Poland, 91-347
        • Research Site
      • Zabrze, Poland, 41-800
        • Research Site
  • Romania
      • Timisoara, Romania, 300244
        • Research Site
  • Slovakia
      • Bardejov, Slovakia, 085 01
        • Research Site
      • Brezno, Slovakia, 977 42
        • Research Site
      • Lucenec, Slovakia, 984 01
        • Research Site
      • Piestany, Slovakia, 921 01
        • Research Site
      • Presov, Slovakia, 080 01
        • Research Site
      • Svidnik, Slovakia, 089 01
        • Research Site
      • Trencin, Slovakia, 911 01
        • Research Site
      • Zilina, Slovakia, 010 01
        • Research Site
  • South Africa
    • Western Cape
      • Parow, Western Cape, South Africa, 7505
        • Research Site
  • Switzerland
      • Geneva 14, Switzerland, 1211
        • Research Site
  • United States
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32216
        • Research Site
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33125
        • Research Site
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30342
        • Research Site
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60616
        • Research Site
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89128
        • Research Site
    • Tennessee
      • Jackson, Tennessee, United States, 38305
        • Research Site
    • Texas
      • New Braunfels, Texas, United States, 78130
        • Research Site
      • Wichita Falls, Texas, United States, 76301
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • History of chronic stable angina or at least 3 months prior to screening, with at least 1 angina episode per month
  • Ischemic heart disease documented by myocardial infarction, coronary angiography or a revascularization procedure
  • Receiving stable doses of cardiac medication
  • Completes 2 exercise treadmill tests during screening meeting protocol requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participating in another investigational study
  • Current or prior malignancy within 5 years of randomization
  • Known sensitivity to any components of the investigational product
  • Not able to complete all protocol required study visits
  • Having the following within 3 months prior to or during screening: Unstable angina or acute coronary syndrome, transient Ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke, revascularization procedure, or instability in ST-segment depression between screening exercise treadmill tests, as assessed by the core electrocardiograph (ECG) laboratory

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants received a single dose of placebo administered by intravenous infusion on day 1.
Drug: Placebo
A single dose of a matching volume of placebo infused over approximately 60 minutes.
Experimental: Erenumab
Participants received a single dose of erenumab 140 mg administered by intravenous infusion on day 1.
Drug: Erenumab
A single dose of erenumab 140 mg infused over approximately 60 minutes.
Other Names:
  • AMG 334
  • Aimovig™

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Total Exercise Time
Time Frame: Baseline and day 1, after dosing

Total exercise time was assessed using an exercise treadmill test according to the standard Bruce protocol.

The Bruce protocol is a standardized multistage treadmill test for assessing cardiovascular health, where the participant walks on an uphill treadmill in a graded exercise test with electrodes on the chest to monitor cardiac function. Every 3 minutes, the speed and incline of the treadmill are increased. There are 7 such stages for a total possible exercise time of 21 minutes.
Baseline and day 1, after dosing

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Onset of Exercise-induced Angina
Time Frame: Day 1
Time to onset of angina was defined as the time the participant received study drug to the time of event onset during the exercise treadmill test. If no event occurred the participant was censored at the exercise treadmill test stop time.
Day 1
Time to Onset of ≥ 1 mm ST-segment Depression
Time Frame: Day 1

Time to onset of ≥ 1 mm ST-segment depression was defined as the time the participant received study drug to the time of event onset during the exercise treadmill test. If no event occurred the participant was censored at the exercise treadmill test stop time.

Heart rate and rhythm were monitored during the exercise treadmill test by electrocardiography (ECG).
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Amgen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 23, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 23, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 13, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 13, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 15, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 24, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 27, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20140254
  • 2015-002322-40 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stable Angina

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings