180 Degree vs. 360 Degree Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty as Initial Therapy for Glaucoma

November 3, 2020 updated by: Temple University

A Randomized Trial of 180 Degree vs. 360 Degree Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty as Initial Therapy for Glaucoma

Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is a well-recognized way to lower eye pressure in treatment of glaucoma. This treatment is performed for 180 degrees or 360 degrees, and studies at academic centers have shown mixed results when comparing the success rates of 180 degrees or 360 degrees. Both protocols are now typically done by comprehensive ophthalmologists. However, there is no data that compares success rates of 180 degrees and 360 degrees in the community setting.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is designed as a prospective evaluation of the two treatment algorithms for SLT by measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) after treatment. The hypothesis is that 360 degrees of SLT will produce a greater reduction in IOP than 180 degrees of SLT at 3 months follow up.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
76

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Delaware
      • Wilmington, Delaware, United States, 19810
        • Brandywine Eye Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Thorndale, Pennsylvania, United States, 19372
        • Levin Luminais Chronister Eye Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients who have been diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma including ocular hypertension, pseudoexfoliation and pigment dispersion syndrome
  • greater than 18 years of age
  • initial intraocular pressure (IOP) of ≥ 21 mmHg

Exclusion Criteria:

  • prior medical or laser therapy to lower IOP
  • previous incisional glaucoma surgery before the study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: 180 degrees
180 degrees of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty using Neodymium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (YAG) laser
Procedure: Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty
The procedure uses light energy provided by a neodymium (Nd):Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (YAG) laser that is directed into the iridocorneal angle via a goniolens viewed through a standard slit lamp.
Other Names:
  • SLT
Device: Neodymium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (YAG) laser
The procedure uses a 400 μm spot size of light energy provided by a low-energy, Q-switched, frequency-doubled (532 nm) neodymium (Nd):Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (YAG) laser with a short pulse duration of 3 nanoseconds that is directed into the iridocorneal angle via a goniolens viewed through a standard slit lamp.
Other Names:
  • Nd:YAG laser
Active Comparator: 360 degrees
360 degrees of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty using Neodymium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (YAG) laser
Procedure: Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty
The procedure uses light energy provided by a neodymium (Nd):Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (YAG) laser that is directed into the iridocorneal angle via a goniolens viewed through a standard slit lamp.
Other Names:
  • SLT
Device: Neodymium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (YAG) laser
The procedure uses a 400 μm spot size of light energy provided by a low-energy, Q-switched, frequency-doubled (532 nm) neodymium (Nd):Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (YAG) laser with a short pulse duration of 3 nanoseconds that is directed into the iridocorneal angle via a goniolens viewed through a standard slit lamp.
Other Names:
  • Nd:YAG laser

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Measured by Tonometry in Millimeters of Mercury at Three Months of Follow-up
Time Frame: 3 months
Intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by tonometry in millimeters of mercury at three months of follow-up
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Measured by Tonometry in Millimeters of Mercury at 1 Year of Follow-up
Time Frame: 1 year
Intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by tonometry in millimeters of mercury at 1 year of follow-up
1 year
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Measured by Tonometry in Millimeters of Mercury at Time at Which Additional Glaucoma Therapy is Required
Time Frame: within 1 year of study intervention
Intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by tonometry in millimeters of mercury at time at which additional glaucoma therapy is required
within 1 year of study intervention
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Measured by Tonometry in Millimeters of Mercury at Last Follow-up
Time Frame: within 1 year of study intervention
Intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by tonometry in millimeters of mercury at last follow-up
within 1 year of study intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Intraocular Pressure (IOP) Spike Assessed by Tonometry
Time Frame: within 1 year of study intervention
If IOP spike occurs, it will be treated accordingly.
within 1 year of study intervention
Number of Participants With Trabeculitis Assessed by Ophthalmic Exam and Gonioscopy
Time Frame: within 1 year of study intervention
If trabeculitis occurs, it will be treated accordingly.
within 1 year of study intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Temple University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey D. Henderer, MD, Temple University
  • Study Director: Sophia Siu, MD, Temple University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 11, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 5, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 3, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 21921

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings