Bright Light on Fatigue in Women Being Treated for Breast Cancer
Bright Light on Fatigue in Women Being Treated for Breast Cancer: A Pilot Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
- Other: Bright blue-green light using light visor cap
- Other: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire
- Other: Epworth Sleepiness Scale
- Other: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
- Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Sleep Disturbance
- Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Cancer-Fatigue
- Diagnostic test: Digital foot candle datalogging light meter (Extech Instrument, Model SDL400)
- Diagnostic test: Polysomnography (Easy Ambulatory 2 Cadwell, Kennewick, WA)
- Other: Horne-Ostberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire
- Other: Daily Fatigue and Sleep Log
- Other: Dim red light using light visor cap
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
- Washington University School of Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 21 years of age or older
- Newly diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer
- Scheduled to receive 21-day cycles of intravenous chemotherapy
- Experiencing disrupted sleep (determined by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index)
- Morning or evening types (determined by Horne-Ostberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ)
- Sighted
- Mentally competent to consent
- Able to under English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Concurrent malignancy
- Undergoing other cancer treatments
- Engage in shift work or travel across more than 3 time zones within 2 weeks prior to study
- Known history of seasonal affective disorder or substance abuse
- Current diagnosis of major Axis I psychiatric disorders, neurological impairments, or muscular dystrophies
- Regularly use steroid or other immunosuppressive medications
- Take prescribed sedative hypnotics or sleep medications because these conditions may affect fatigue and/or sleep/wake patterns.
- Have eye conditions (glaucoma or retinal disease), problems triggered by bright light (e.g. migraine), or take photosensitizing medications (e.g. some porphyrin drugs, antipsychotics, antiarrhythmic agents)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm 1: Bright blue-green light
Complete the MEQ at screening, the day before 2nd cycle of chemo, and on the day of 3rd cycle of chemo, -21 day light intervention at home for 30 min once a day during 2nd cycle of chemo, Scores of ≤41 (evening types) on MEQ will have light delivered within 30 minutes of waking for 21 consecutive mornings.
Score of ≥59 (morning types) on MEQ will have light delivered between 1900-2000 hours for 21 consecutive evenings.
Light therapy will be self-administered using a light visor cap.
On 2 randomly selected days ambient light will be recorded continuously during waking hours using a digital foot candle datalogging light meter, Continuous ambulatory PSG for 24 hours at the participant's home before and after the light intervention, Complete the fatigue and sleep log on a daily basis and two visual analog scales (VAS) (diurnal fatigue and daytime sleepiness) within half an hour upon awakening, at 1200 hours, 1600 hours, 2000 hours, and within half an hour before going to bed
|
-Consists of 30 items with a 4-point rating scale (1=not at all to 4=very much) measuring functioning, symptom intensity, and global health status/quality of life
Other Names:
-Consists of 8 common daily activities with a 4-point rating scale (0=would never doze to 3=a high chance of dozing) measuring usual daytime sleepiness over a recent time period
Other Names:
-Contains 19 self-report items measuring sleep quality, latency, duration, efficiency, disturbance, medication use, and daytime dysfunction.
Each item is rated on a 0-3 rating scale.
The global PSQI score ranges 0-21, with higher scores indicating more severe sleep disturbance
Other Names:
-Consists of 8 items with 5-point rating scales measuring overall sleep and sleep-related impairments.
Higher scores indicate worse sleep disturbances
-Consists of 8 items with a 5-point rating scale (1=not at all to 5 =very much) measuring fatigue experience and fatigue impact.
Higher scores indicate worse fatigue.
-The light-weight light sensor is approximately 2 inches in diameter and comes with a clip and strap that makes it comfortable to wear just below the neck.
-A standard sleep montage of electroencephalography following the 10/20 procedure for electrode placement, left and right electrooculography referenced to the opposite mastoid and mentalis electromyography will be followed
Other Names:
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Arm 2: Dim red light
Complete the MEQ at screening, the day before 2nd cycle of chemo, and on the day of 3rd cycle of chemo, 21 day light intervention at home for 30 min once a day during 2nd cycle of chemo, Scores of ≤41 (evening types) on MEQ will have light delivered within 30 minutes of waking for 21 consecutive mornings.
Score of ≥59 (morning types) on MEQ will have light delivered between 1900-2000 hours for 21 consecutive evenings.
Light therapy will be self-administered using a light visor cap.
On 2 days randomly selected days ambient light will be recorded continuously during waking hours using a digital foot candle datalogging light meter, Continuous ambulatory PSG for 24 hours at the participant's home before and after the light intervention, Complete the fatigue and sleep log on a daily basis and two visual analog scales (VAS) (diurnal fatigue and daytime sleepiness) within half an hour upon awakening, at 1200 hours, 1600 hours, 2000 hours, and within half an hour before going to bed
|
-Consists of 30 items with a 4-point rating scale (1=not at all to 4=very much) measuring functioning, symptom intensity, and global health status/quality of life
Other Names:
-Consists of 8 common daily activities with a 4-point rating scale (0=would never doze to 3=a high chance of dozing) measuring usual daytime sleepiness over a recent time period
Other Names:
-Contains 19 self-report items measuring sleep quality, latency, duration, efficiency, disturbance, medication use, and daytime dysfunction.
Each item is rated on a 0-3 rating scale.
The global PSQI score ranges 0-21, with higher scores indicating more severe sleep disturbance
Other Names:
-Consists of 8 items with 5-point rating scales measuring overall sleep and sleep-related impairments.
Higher scores indicate worse sleep disturbances
-Consists of 8 items with a 5-point rating scale (1=not at all to 5 =very much) measuring fatigue experience and fatigue impact.
Higher scores indicate worse fatigue.
-The light-weight light sensor is approximately 2 inches in diameter and comes with a clip and strap that makes it comfortable to wear just below the neck.
-A standard sleep montage of electroencephalography following the 10/20 procedure for electrode placement, left and right electrooculography referenced to the opposite mastoid and mentalis electromyography will be followed
Other Names:
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of implementing a bright light intervention as measured by estimating completion of scheduled PSG recording
Time Frame: Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
-Feasibility of the procedures will be assessed by descriptive analysis
|
Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
|
Effect of bright light on fatigue as measured by PROMIS-Cancer Fatigue
Time Frame: Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
|
|
Effect of bright light on fatigue as measured by VAS (diurnal fatigue) in Daily Fatigue and Sleep Log
Time Frame: Through of completion of study (approximately 43 days)
|
Through of completion of study (approximately 43 days)
|
|
|
Effect of bright light on sleep patterns as measured by PSG
Time Frame: Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
|
|
Effect of bright light on sleep patterns as measured by PROMIS-Sleep Disturbance
Time Frame: Through of completion of study (approximately 43 days)
|
Through of completion of study (approximately 43 days)
|
|
|
Effect of bight light on sleep patterns as measured by PSQI
Time Frame: Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
|
|
Effect of bright light on wake patterns as measured by PSG
Time Frame: Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
|
|
Effect of bright light on wake patterns as measured by ESS
Time Frame: Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
|
|
Effect of bright light on wake patterns as measured by VAS (daytime sleepiness) in Daily Fatigue and Sleep Log
Time Frame: Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
|
|
Effect of bright light on quality of life as measured by EORCT QLQ C-30
Time Frame: Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
|
|
Feasibility of implementing a bright light intervention as measured by completion rates of self-report forms
Time Frame: Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
-Feasibility of the procedures will be assessed by descriptive analysis
|
Through completion of study (approximately 50 days)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Horng-Shiuann Wu, Ph.D., R.N., Washington University School of Medicine
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 201503075
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.