Laparoscopic-assisted Total Gastrectomy Versus Open Total Gastrectomy With Splenic Hilum Lymph Nodes Dissection

April 7, 2017 updated by: Wei Wang, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Laparoscopic-assisted Total Gastrectomy Versus Open Total Gastrectomy With Spleen-preserving Splenic Hilum Lymph Nodes Dissection for Advanced Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study investigates the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy with spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph node dissection for proximal advanced gastric cancer and compares the early results of this procedure with open total gastrectomy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

For advanced proximal gastric cancer, total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is the standard surgical therapy. Apparently, lymph nodes (LNs) dissection along the splenic artery (No.11) and the splenic hilum (No.10) is recommended by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines. Nevertheless, complete removal of the No. 10 and No. 11d LNs is technically challenging due to the tortuous splenic vessels and the high possibility of injury to the parenchyma of the spleen and pancreas. Recently, the application of minimally invasive surgery for advanced gastric cancer is gaining popularity. However, laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) with standard D2 lymphadenectomy was still not widely performed, because pancreas- and spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph node dissection were mainly challenging manipulations for laparoscopic surgeons. Herein, we aim to investigate the safety and feasibility of LATG with spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph node dissection for proximal advanced gastric cancer and compares the early results of this procedure with open total gastrectomy (OTG).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
144

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510120
        • Recruiting
        • Guangdong Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jin Wan
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Wenjun Xiong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with advanced proximal gastric cancer （T2-T4a,N0-N3,M0）
  • Informed consent
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG): 0 ot 1
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists （ASA） score: Ⅰto Ⅲ

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or female in suckling period
  • Contraindication to general anesthesia (severe cardiac and/or pulmonary disease)
  • Severe mental disease
  • Emergency operation due to complication (bleeding, perforation or obstruction) caused by primary tumor
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy
Patients including in the laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) group will undergo LATG with spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph nodes dissection.
Procedure: Laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy
When patients with advanced proximal gastric cancer are randomized in the laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) group, they will received LATG with spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph nodes dissection.
Other Names:
  • LATG
Active Comparator: Open total gastrectomy
Patients who are included in the open total gastrectomy (OTG) group will OTG with spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph nodes dissection.
Procedure: Open total gastrectomy
When patients with advanced proximal gastric cancer are randomized in the open total gastrectomy (OTG) group, they will received OTG with spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph nodes dissection.
Other Names:
  • OTG

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early complication rate
Time Frame: 30 days
The early complication rate is defined as the event observed during operation and within 30 days after surgery.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative time
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Intraoperative
Time of splenic hilum lymph nodes dissection
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Intraoperative
Operative blood loss
Time Frame: Intraoperative
It will be assessed with the unit of "ml".
Intraoperative
Incision length
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Number of total lymph nodes harvested
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Number of group No.10 lymph nodes harvested
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Number of lymph nodes posterior to splenic vessel
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Poster-operative recovery course
Time Frame: 30 days
Time to first ambulation, flatus, liquid diet and duration of hospital stay are used to assess the postoperative recovery course.
30 days
3-year disease free survival rate
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
5-year overall survival rate
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Metastasis rate of lymph nodes posterior to splenic vessel
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Wei Wang, M.D., PH.D., Guangdong Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 9, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 17, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 7, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GDPHCM-GI-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings