Effect of Obesity on Surgical Outcomes and Survival for Gastric Cancer

December 7, 2017 updated by: Jian-Kun Hu

Effect of Obesity on Surgical Outcomes and Survival for Gastric Cancer Patients: a Single Center Prospective Cohort Study

As the number of obesity continues to increase, surgical oncologist pay more attention to the effect of obesity on surgical outcomes and survival of digestive systemin cancers. Body mass index(BMI) is one of the most widely used measurements of obesity. Abdominal fat area (AFA) calculated by computed tomography is popular because of its validity of fat distribution. There is still no consensus which of BMI and AFA could be the more effective measurement and more accurate to evaluate effect of obesity on surgical outcomes and survival. Gastric cancer is one of the most common digestive system cancers, and gastrectomy is the primary therapeutic options.It is important to compare the different measurements(BMI or AFA) to assess obesity and effect on surgical outcome and survival for gastric cancer patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Standard operation procedure（SOP）

  1. Preoperative evaluation Patients satisfied with inclusion/exclusion criteria will be informed to join in the clinical study and signature the inform consent.
  2. Procedures: The surgical treatments is adopted total or subtotal gastrectomy according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer treatments guidelines, 2010, Version 3.
  3. Postoperative recovery: Postoperative recovery period need to collect those relevant parameters of all the patients. All the relevant parameters had definitely definition in the Case Report Form of this study which included the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative clinicopathologic characteristics.
  4. Follow-up: Follow-up will last to 5-year of the postoperative period. The postoperative complications is graded by the clavian-dildo classification. The postoperative complications and quality of life (change of AFA,performance status, recurrence and overall survival)are the focus of this study.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
600

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • Recruiting
        • West China Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jian-Kun Hu, M.D.Ph.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Dong-Jiao Guo, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Xin-Zu Chen, M.D.Ph.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Preoperative endoscopy and biopsy confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma, and predictively feasible of conventional open total gastrectomy or subtotal gastrectomy;
  2. Predictively resectable diseases, of preoperative staging Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 14th Edition clinical T1N0M0-T4aN+M0;
  3. Age：≤75 years, or ≥18 years;
  4. Without serious disease and malignance disease;
  5. Without histories of abdominal surgery;
  6. World Health Organization performance score ≤2, American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≤3;
  7. No limit to sexual and race;
  8. Informed consent required;
  9. Obesity is defined as BMI≧30kg/m2 or preoperative AFA≧100cm2/cm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with other severe complications cannot tolerate surgery: such as severe heart and lung diseases, heart function below clinical stage 2, uncontrollable hypertension, pulmonary infection, moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic bronchitis, severe diabetes and / or renal insufficiency, severe hepatitis and / or function below the rank of CHILD B grade, and severe malnutrition, etc;
  2. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy which might affect the efficacy observation;
  3. Severity mental diseases;
  4. Primary lesion cannot be resected in the pattern of transabdominal gastrectomy, but for Whipple's procedure, or with a transthoracic approach surgery;
  5. After signature the Clinical trial agreement, patients and their agent will quit the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: BMI group (Successive patients)
All successive patients meeting the including criteria and signed the informed consent will be measured BMI and the data will be recorded in the prospective database. The formula for BMI is weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m2). the normal range is usually considered to be 18.5 to 24.9, with less than 18.5 considered underweight, more than 25.0 considered overweight and above 30.0 obese. Investigators declare that there exists no conflicts of interest.
Other: BMI group (successive patients)
The formula for BMI is weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m2). the normal range is usually considered to be 18.5 to 24.9, with less than 18.5 considered underweight, more than 25.0 considered overweight and above 30.0 obese.
Experimental: AFA group(Successive patients)
All successive patients meeting the including criteria and signed the informed consent will be measured BMI and the data will be recorded in the prospective database. The abdominal fat area at the umbilical level was measured using a CT scanner(sango Mount Monitor Wireless Panel; Siemens , Munich, Germany) while the examinee was in a supine position and estimated using a Volume software (fat Pointer; Siemens , Munich, Germany). The imaging conditions were 120 kilovolt and 50 milliampere, using a 5-mm-thick slice.The areas covered by visceral fat software calculated from pixels with densities ranging from-190 to -30 hounsfield unit. No contrast agent is needed. Patients in the AFA group will be also measured by BMI. Investigators declare that there exists no conflicts of interest.
Other: BMI group (successive patients)
The formula for BMI is weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m2). the normal range is usually considered to be 18.5 to 24.9, with less than 18.5 considered underweight, more than 25.0 considered overweight and above 30.0 obese.
Device: AFA group (successive patients)
The abdominal fat area at the umbilical level was measured using a CT scanner(sango Mount Monitor Wireless Panel; Siemens , Munich, Germany) while the examinee was in a supine position and estimated using a Volume software (fat Pointer; Siemens , Munich, Germany). The imaging conditions were 120 kilovolt and 50 milliampere, using a 5-mm-thick slice.The areas covered by visceral fat software calculated from pixels with densities ranging from-190 to -30 hounsfield unit . No contrast agent is needed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative complications
Time Frame: 30-day of postoperative duration
The criteria of postoperative complications in the BMI group and AFA group both adopt the definition of The clavian-dildo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250 (2):187-96.Postoperative complications in Grade 1 were classified as minor complications, while complications in Grade 2 to 5 were classified as major complications.
30-day of postoperative duration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of the postoperative BMI
Time Frame: 5-year of postoperative duration.
The body weight(kilograms) and height(meters) change of all enrollment after 5-year postoperative duration were measured to get the change of BMI.The formula for BMI is weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m2). The change of BMI was compared between preoperation and 5-year postoperative duration.
5-year of postoperative duration.
Change of the postoperative AFA
Time Frame: 5-year of postoperative duration
AFA of all enrollment after 5-year postoperative duration were measured by CT. The AFA at the umbilical level was measured using a CT scanner (sango Mount Monitor Wireless Panel; Siemens , Munich, Germany) while the examinee was in a supine position and estimated using a Volume software (fat Pointer; Siemens , Munich, Germany). The imaging conditions were 120 kilovolt and 50 milliampere, using a 5-mm-thick slice. The areas covered by visceral fat software calculated from pixels with densities ranging from-190 to -30 hounsfield unit. The change of AFA was compared between preoperation and 5-year postoperative duration.
5-year of postoperative duration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Jian-Kun Hu

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
West China Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jian-Kun Hu, M.D.Ph.D., West China Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 11, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 7, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • WCH-GC-04

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings