Fear of Activity in Situations (FActS) - Study 2016

September 4, 2019 updated by: Prof. Dr. Heike Spaderna, University of Trier

Fear of Activity in Situations (FActS) - Heart Failure Study 2016

The aim of the study is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly developed Fear of Activity in Situations - Heart Failure (FActS-HF 15) scale. The FActS-HF 15 is a questionnaire assessing fear of physical activity (fear of movement) in patients with chronic heart failure. FActS-HF 15 assesses cognitions and emotions that can occur during physical activity, independent of avoidance behavior. Firstly, the study aims at evaluating the instrument's reliability and validity and to investigate associations of fear of physical activity with demographic, medical, and psychosocial patient characteristics. Secondly, the study aims at assessing everyday physical activity using accelerometric measures to test the hypothesis that fear of physical activity in patients with heart failure is related with lower actual physical activity.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
187

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Aachen, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Aachen
      • Homburg, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum des Saarlands
      • Trier, Germany, 54290
        • Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen
      • Trier, Germany
        • Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier
      • Trier, Germany
        • Geriatrische Rehabilitationsklinik St. Irminen
      • Würselen, Germany, 52146
        • Rhein-Maas-Klinikum

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will consist of adult patients with diagnosed chronic heart failure of all underlying diagnoses. Patients have to be outpatients at time of study participation. They will be recruted in primary care clinics, and heart failure outpatient clinics in Germany.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of heart failure stage B or C (Hunt et al., 2005), or: New York Heart Failure classification II to IIIb:

    1. Systolic dysfunction: left ventricular ejection fraction < 45% in the last 6 month
    2. Diastolic dysfunction: left ventricular ejection fraction >= 45% in the last 6 month

Exclusion Criteria:

  • complex ventricular arrhythmias
  • acute myocarditis
  • symptomatic cardiac valve stenosis
  • instable angina pectoris
  • other severe diseases, that impair physical activity (e.g., advanced stages of cancer)
  • insufficient language skills in German to answer the questionnaires
  • insufficient cognitive skills to answer the questionnaires

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Patients with chronic heart failure

Fear of physical activity (exposure) will be assessed in adult outpatients with diagnosed, chronic heart failure (with reduced ejection fraction or with preserved ejection fraction).

Hospitals provide medical data to assess patients' disease severity. Additional measures assessed via questionnaire include demographic characteristics, State and Trait depression and anxiety, heart failure related symptom distress, and coping dispositions relevant for coping with physical threat.

Fear of physical activity (FActS-HF 15) is reassessed after 4 weeks to evaluate the instrument's retest reliability.

After questionnaire completion, a subsample of participants will wear the MOVE III accelerometer for one week to objectively assess everyday physical activity and fill in an activity diary.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FActS-HF 15 total score and subscores
Time Frame: 2016-2019
The psychometric properties of FActS-HF 15 are assessed in terms of item analysis, reliability (internal consistency, test-retest reliability), convergent and discriminant validity (correlations with other questionnaires) as well as confirmatory factor analysis (assessing the dimensionality). Associations with demographic, medical, and psychosocial variables will be evaluated.
2016-2019

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average daily energy expenditure due to physical activity (kcal/d)
Time Frame: 6 day assessment, after questionnaire completion
Objectively assessed via accelerometry
6 day assessment, after questionnaire completion
Average intensity of physical activity (MET)
Time Frame: 6 day assessment, after questionnaire completion
Objectively assessed via accelerometry
6 day assessment, after questionnaire completion
Average relative frequency of activity classes
Time Frame: 6 day assessment, after questionnaire completion
Relative frequency of activity classes stair climbing, lying down, walking
6 day assessment, after questionnaire completion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Trier

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
RWTH Aachen University
University Hospital, Saarland
Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier
Geriatric Rehabilitation Clinic St. Irminen

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Heike Spaderna, PhD, Trier University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 2, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 4, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FActS Study 2016

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings