Effects of an e-Home Based Symptom Management and Mindfulness Training Programme on QoL in Breast Cancer Survivors
Effects of an e-Home Based Symptom Management and Mindfulness Training Programme on Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Singapore, Singapore
- National University Hospital
-
Singapore, Singapore
- National Cancer Centre Singapore
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- women aged 21 or above
- able to speak and read English
- diagnosed with breast cancer stage 0 to 3 for the first time
- have completed cancer treatment including breast surgery and/or adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy between 6 months to 5 years previously
- with and without ongoing HER2 target therapy (e.g.: Herceptin) and/or hormonal therapy
- with ECOG Performance Status score of 0 to 1
- able to understand the study and give informed consent
- have access to the internet through a handheld device
Exclusion Criteria:
- they are illiterate
- have serious psychiatric disorders (e.g. schizophrenia, dementia, and intellectual disabilities)
- with ECOG Performance Status score of 2 or above
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Usual care group
Usual care is meant the routine medical and health care services at the hospital.
|
|
|
Experimental: Experimental group
Five weekly sessions of online symptom management + mindfulness training programme + usual care
|
5 weekly sessions of online self-administered mindfulness training programme in which they will receive audio-recorded and video-recorded instructions, pictorial or text-based instructions for various mindfulness exercises such as body scan meditation, mindful breathing and walking meditation.
5 weekly online education module in which they will receive video-recorded, audio-recorded, pictorial or text-based instructions for various self-management strategies.
Topics include fatigue, pain, numbness/tingling, lymphedema, anxiety/depression, and problems with sleeping.
|
|
Active Comparator: Comparison group 1
Five weekly sessions of online symptom management programme + usual care
|
5 weekly online education module in which they will receive video-recorded, audio-recorded, pictorial or text-based instructions for various self-management strategies.
Topics include fatigue, pain, numbness/tingling, lymphedema, anxiety/depression, and problems with sleeping.
|
|
Active Comparator: Comparison group 2
Five weekly sessions of online mindfulness training programme and usual care
|
5 weekly sessions of online self-administered mindfulness training programme in which they will receive audio-recorded and video-recorded instructions, pictorial or text-based instructions for various mindfulness exercises such as body scan meditation, mindful breathing and walking meditation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Change from baseline quality of life score at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 8 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 8 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline quality of life score at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 12 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 12 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline quality of life score at 24 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 24 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 24 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Change from baseline social support score at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 8 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 8 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline social support score at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 12 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 12 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline social support score at 24 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 24 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 24 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline self-efficacy score at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 8 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 8 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline self-efficacy score at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 12 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 12 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline self-efficacy score at 24 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 24 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 24 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline symptom score at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 8 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 8 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline symptom score at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 12 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 12 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline symptom score at 24 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 24 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 24 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline psychosocial adjustment to illness score at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 8 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 8 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline psychosocial adjustment to illness score at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 12 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 12 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline psychosocial adjustment to illness score at 24 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 24 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 24 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline fear of recurrence score at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 8 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 8 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline fear of recurrence score at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 12 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 12 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline fear of recurrence score at 24 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 24 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 24 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline anxiety and depression score at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 8 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 8 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline anxiety and depression score at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 12 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 12 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline anxiety and depression score at 24 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 24 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 24 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline mindfulness score at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 8 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 8 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline mindfulness score at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 12 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 12 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline mindfulness score at 24 weeks
Time Frame: Change between baseline and at 24 weeks
|
Change between baseline and at 24 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Karis Cheng, National University of Singapore
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
- Portenoy RK, Thaler HT, Kornblith AB, Lepore JM, Friedlander-Klar H, Kiyasu E, Sobel K, Coyle N, Kemeny N, Norton L, et al. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale: an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(9):1326-36. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(94)90182-1.
- Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, Toney L. Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment. 2006 Mar;13(1):27-45. doi: 10.1177/1073191105283504.
- Bower JE, Ganz PA, Desmond KA, Bernaards C, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR. Fatigue in long-term breast carcinoma survivors: a longitudinal investigation. Cancer. 2006 Feb 15;106(4):751-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21671.
- Champion VL, Ziner KW, Monahan PO, Stump TE, Cella D, Smith LG, Bell CJ, Von Ah D, Sledge GW. Development and psychometric testing of a breast cancer survivor self-efficacy scale. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Nov;40(6):E403-10. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.E403-E410.
- Ferrell BR, Dow KH, Grant M. Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors. Qual Life Res. 1995 Dec;4(6):523-31. doi: 10.1007/BF00634747.
- Cheng KK, Darshini Devi R, Wong WH, Koh C. Perceived symptoms and the supportive care needs of breast cancer survivors six months to five years post-treatment period. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Feb;18(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- R-545-000-073-592
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.