RIXUBIS Drug Use-Result Survey (Japan)

February 8, 2024 updated by: Baxalta now part of Shire

The purpose of this survey is to understand the following items observed in the actual clinical use of RIXUBIS.

  1. Unexpected adverse drug reactions
  2. Occurrence of adverse drug reactions in the actual clinical use
  3. Factors that may affect safety and effectiveness
  4. Occurrence of Factor IX (FIX) inhibitor development in patients with coagulation FIX deficiency
  5. Safety and effectiveness for hemophilia B patients who received routine prophylactic therapy, on-demand therapy and perioperative therapy

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
6

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
    • Gifu Prefecture
      • Seki-shi, Gifu Prefecture, Japan, 501-3802
        • Seki-shi, Japan
    • Gunma Prefecture
      • Maebashi-shi, Gunma Prefecture, Japan, 371-8511
        • Maebashi-shi, Japan
    • Miyazaki Prefecture
      • Nobeoka-shi, Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan, 882-0835
        • Nobeoka-shi, Japan
    • Niigata Prefecture
      • Niigata-shi, Niigata Prefecture, Japan, 950-0862
        • Niigata-shi, Japan
    • Osaka Prefecture
      • Osaka-shi, Osaka Prefecture, Japan, 543-0001
        • Osaka-shi, Japan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with hemophilia B (congenital blood coagulation factor IX deficiency) who receive RIXUBIS in the actual clinical setting

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hemophilia B scheduled to receive treatment with RIXUBIS

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not administered RIXUBIS

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
All Study Participants
Biological: RIXUBIS
Other Names:
  • Recombinant factor IX
  • BAX326
  • Coagulation Factor IX [Recombinant]
  • BAX 326

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Discontinued the Use of Nonacog Gamma (Genetical Recombination)
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
Number of participants who discontinued the use of Nonacog Gamma (Genetical Recombination) was reported in this outcome measure.
Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
Number of Participants Who Developed a Factor IX (FIX) Inhibitor
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
Number of participants who developed a Factor IX (FIX) Inhibitor was reported in this outcome measure.
Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
Annual Bleed Rate (ABR): Number of Times of Bleeding During the Study
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
Annual bleed rate (ABR) was defined as the number of times of bleeding during the study. ABR was reported in this outcome measure.
Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
Number of Doses to Treat A Bleed of Participants on An On-Demand Regimen
Time Frame: At bleed resolution throughout the study period of approximately 4 ½ years
Number of doses to treat a bleed of participants on an on-demand regimen was reported in this outcome measure.
At bleed resolution throughout the study period of approximately 4 ½ years
Hemostatic Effectiveness of Rixubis for Participants on An On-Demand Regimen Based on a 4-Point Ordinal Scale (Excellent, Moderate, Good, Poor)
Time Frame: At bleed resolution throughout the study period of approximately 4 ½ years
Number of participants in hemostatic effectiveness of Rixubis with a 4-point ordinal scale (Excellent, Moderate, Good, Poor) for an on-demand regimen was reported in this outcome measure. The definition of each scale was following: Excellent; After a single infusion, complete disappearance of pain and objective decrease of bleeding symptom (swelling, tenderness, and increase in range of motion in musculoskeletal bleeding case) were observed. Good; After a single infusion, there were definitive relief of pain and improvement of bleeding symptom. Fair; After a single infusion, there were a probable or slight relief of pain and a mild improvement of bleeding signs. Poor; Improvement was not observed or symptom was aggravated.
At bleed resolution throughout the study period of approximately 4 ½ years
Hemostatic Effectiveness of Rixubis in Surgery-Perioperative and Postoperative Based on a 4-Point Ordinal Scale (Excellent, Moderate, Good, Poor) for Participants Who Received Perioperative Therapy During the Study
Time Frame: Assessed at the time of discharge from recovery room; and at 24 to 72 hours postoperatively
Number of participants in hemostatic effectiveness of Rixubis with a 4-point ordinal scale (Excellent, Moderate, Good, Poor) for perioperative therapy was reported in this outcome measure. The definition of each scale was following: Excellent; Amount of bleeding is smaller than expected. Good; Amount of bleeding is within the expected range. Fair; Amount of bleeding is greater than expected, with use of additional concomitant medication. Poor; Hemostasis difficulty.
Assessed at the time of discharge from recovery room; and at 24 to 72 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events of Shock or Anaphylaxis
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
Number of participants who experienced adverse events of shock or anaphylaxis was reported in this outcome measure.
Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events of Thromboembolism
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
Number of participants who experienced adverse events of thromboembolism was reported in this outcome measure.
Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Baxalta now part of Shire

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Takeda

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Study Director, Shire

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 16, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 11, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 11, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 17, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 8, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 251601

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data from this particular study will not be shared as there is a reasonable likelihood that individual patients could be re-identified (due to the limited number of study participants/study sites).

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings