- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02937831
RIXUBIS Drug Use-Result Survey (Japan)
February 8, 2024 updated by: Baxalta now part of Shire
The purpose of this survey is to understand the following items observed in the actual clinical use of RIXUBIS.
- Unexpected adverse drug reactions
- Occurrence of adverse drug reactions in the actual clinical use
- Factors that may affect safety and effectiveness
- Occurrence of Factor IX (FIX) inhibitor development in patients with coagulation FIX deficiency
- Safety and effectiveness for hemophilia B patients who received routine prophylactic therapy, on-demand therapy and perioperative therapy
Study Overview
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
6
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Gifu Prefecture
-
Seki-shi, Gifu Prefecture, Japan, 501-3802
- Seki-shi, Japan
-
-
Gunma Prefecture
-
Maebashi-shi, Gunma Prefecture, Japan, 371-8511
- Maebashi-shi, Japan
-
-
Miyazaki Prefecture
-
Nobeoka-shi, Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan, 882-0835
- Nobeoka-shi, Japan
-
-
Niigata Prefecture
-
Niigata-shi, Niigata Prefecture, Japan, 950-0862
- Niigata-shi, Japan
-
-
Osaka Prefecture
-
Osaka-shi, Osaka Prefecture, Japan, 543-0001
- Osaka-shi, Japan
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients with hemophilia B (congenital blood coagulation factor IX deficiency) who receive RIXUBIS in the actual clinical setting
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with hemophilia B scheduled to receive treatment with RIXUBIS
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients not administered RIXUBIS
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
All Study Participants
|
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Discontinued the Use of Nonacog Gamma (Genetical Recombination)
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
|
Number of participants who discontinued the use of Nonacog Gamma (Genetical Recombination) was reported in this outcome measure.
|
Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
|
|
Number of Participants Who Developed a Factor IX (FIX) Inhibitor
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
|
Number of participants who developed a Factor IX (FIX) Inhibitor was reported in this outcome measure.
|
Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
|
|
Annual Bleed Rate (ABR): Number of Times of Bleeding During the Study
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
|
Annual bleed rate (ABR) was defined as the number of times of bleeding during the study.
ABR was reported in this outcome measure.
|
Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
|
|
Number of Doses to Treat A Bleed of Participants on An On-Demand Regimen
Time Frame: At bleed resolution throughout the study period of approximately 4 ½ years
|
Number of doses to treat a bleed of participants on an on-demand regimen was reported in this outcome measure.
|
At bleed resolution throughout the study period of approximately 4 ½ years
|
|
Hemostatic Effectiveness of Rixubis for Participants on An On-Demand Regimen Based on a 4-Point Ordinal Scale (Excellent, Moderate, Good, Poor)
Time Frame: At bleed resolution throughout the study period of approximately 4 ½ years
|
Number of participants in hemostatic effectiveness of Rixubis with a 4-point ordinal scale (Excellent, Moderate, Good, Poor) for an on-demand regimen was reported in this outcome measure.
The definition of each scale was following: Excellent; After a single infusion, complete disappearance of pain and objective decrease of bleeding symptom (swelling, tenderness, and increase in range of motion in musculoskeletal bleeding case) were observed.
Good; After a single infusion, there were definitive relief of pain and improvement of bleeding symptom.
Fair; After a single infusion, there were a probable or slight relief of pain and a mild improvement of bleeding signs.
Poor; Improvement was not observed or symptom was aggravated.
|
At bleed resolution throughout the study period of approximately 4 ½ years
|
|
Hemostatic Effectiveness of Rixubis in Surgery-Perioperative and Postoperative Based on a 4-Point Ordinal Scale (Excellent, Moderate, Good, Poor) for Participants Who Received Perioperative Therapy During the Study
Time Frame: Assessed at the time of discharge from recovery room; and at 24 to 72 hours postoperatively
|
Number of participants in hemostatic effectiveness of Rixubis with a 4-point ordinal scale (Excellent, Moderate, Good, Poor) for perioperative therapy was reported in this outcome measure.
The definition of each scale was following: Excellent; Amount of bleeding is smaller than expected.
Good; Amount of bleeding is within the expected range.
Fair; Amount of bleeding is greater than expected, with use of additional concomitant medication.
Poor; Hemostasis difficulty.
|
Assessed at the time of discharge from recovery room; and at 24 to 72 hours postoperatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events of Shock or Anaphylaxis
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
|
Number of participants who experienced adverse events of shock or anaphylaxis was reported in this outcome measure.
|
Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
|
|
Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events of Thromboembolism
Time Frame: Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
|
Number of participants who experienced adverse events of thromboembolism was reported in this outcome measure.
|
Throughout the study period, approximately 4 ½ years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Study Director, Shire
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 16, 2016
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 11, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
May 11, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 17, 2016
First Posted (Estimated)
October 19, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 22, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 8, 2024
Last Verified
February 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 251601
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
De-identified individual participant data from this particular study will not be shared as there is a reasonable likelihood that individual patients could be re-identified (due to the limited number of study participants/study sites).
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/.
For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.