18F-FDG Metabolism Imaging Monitoring Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Curative Effect of Chemotherapy Multicenter Clinical Study

October 19, 2016 updated by: Wenhui XIE, Shanghai Chest Hospital
The subject is going to use 18F-FDG PET/CT to assess different genetic NSCLC metabolism after cisplatin chemotherapy and targeted therapy, define the assessment criteria for the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in NSCLC treatment respone and at last build multi-centre clinical trial platform of molecular classification and molecular imaging for cancer chemotherapy assessment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the first leading cause of cancer death in the world. Systemic chemotherapy has contributed to the only choice for more than 50% NSCLC patients. The genetic abnormalities lead to different therapy response to the same chemotherapy scheme in NSCLC patients. At present, early assessment and prediction is the key for optimize NSCLC therapy. 18F-FDG PET/CT is a noninvasive cell metabolism reaction molecular imaging technology which can assess cancer glucose metabolism sensitively and react cancer proliferation to some degree. Hence 18F-FDG PET/CT may be used to assess NSCLC therapy response noninvasively. It is a reliable method to individualize NSCLC treatment clinically by define the appropriate metabolism response cut-off values and assess time points of 18F-FDG PET/CT in predicting different genetic NSCLC patients.The subject is going to use 18F-FDG PET/CT to assess different genetic NSCLC metabolism after cisplatin chemotherapy and targeted therapy, define the assessment criteria for the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in NSCLC treatment respone and at last build multi-centre clinical trial platform of molecular classification and molecular imaging for cancer chemotherapy assessment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • pathological biopsy for NSCLC; stage III-IV; plan to palliative chemotherapy (such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy, convention and targeted therapy) due to unable to surgery; not radiation therapy or chemotherapy for 6 months before enrollment; the predictive survival time more than half year;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • with diabetes and chest radiotherapy chronic disease; brain metastases patients; with secondary primary maligmant cancer in 5 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: before therapy
18F-FDG PET/CT performed before therapy
Radiation: 18F-FDG
18FDG-PET scan was performed 4 weeks before the first administration of therapy or before the third cycle chemotherapy or before the 7th week of targeted therapy and after 3 days chemotherapy and targeted therapy. The lesions were analyzed by nuclear medicine physician and calculate the metabolism response. The size of percent changes was evaluated using the EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) PET criteria by oncologist who determine whether the scheme works and the scheme should continue or change. The seleted patients were double blinded to analyse the relationship between metabolism response and chemotherapy response.
Experimental: 3 days after cisplatin chemotherapy and targeted therapy
18F-FDG PET/CT performed 3 days after chemotherapy and targeted therapy
Radiation: 18F-FDG
18FDG-PET scan was performed 4 weeks before the first administration of therapy or before the third cycle chemotherapy or before the 7th week of targeted therapy and after 3 days chemotherapy and targeted therapy. The lesions were analyzed by nuclear medicine physician and calculate the metabolism response. The size of percent changes was evaluated using the EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) PET criteria by oncologist who determine whether the scheme works and the scheme should continue or change. The seleted patients were double blinded to analyse the relationship between metabolism response and chemotherapy response.
Experimental: longer time after cisplatin chemotherapy and targeted therapy
18F-FDG PET/CT performed before the third cycle chemotherapy and the 7th week targeted therapy
Radiation: 18F-FDG
18FDG-PET scan was performed 4 weeks before the first administration of therapy or before the third cycle chemotherapy or before the 7th week of targeted therapy and after 3 days chemotherapy and targeted therapy. The lesions were analyzed by nuclear medicine physician and calculate the metabolism response. The size of percent changes was evaluated using the EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) PET criteria by oncologist who determine whether the scheme works and the scheme should continue or change. The seleted patients were double blinded to analyse the relationship between metabolism response and chemotherapy response.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Glucose metabolism discrepancy of different genotype NSCLC as Assessed by EORTC
Time Frame: 6 years
6 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Different genotype NSCLC metabolic response after treatment as Assessed by EORTC
Time Frame: 6 years
6 years

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time points of predictive specific genotype NSCLC glucose metabolic response by statistics
Time Frame: 6 years
6 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shanghai Chest Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Wenhui Xie, PHD, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 17, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 17, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 21, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 19, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • WXIE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings