CRUSH STUDY: Calculating Readmission Risk by Ultrasound for Heart Failure Failure Study (CRUSH)

October 1, 2018 updated by: Joseph Pare, Boston Medical Center

CRUSH STUDY: Calculating Readmission Risk by Ultrasound for Heart Failure Study

This is a study to determine if two ultrasound measures (Corrected Flow Time and B-Lines) can predict patients at higher risk of readmission within 30 days of hospital discharge for decompensated heart failure.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Heart failure (HF) resulting in congestion is the leading cause for admission in persons ≥65 years of age and 20-25% of such patients are readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Efforts to treat HF are difficult without a simple method to detect early signs of congestion to direct therapy. Ultrasound can detect evidence of congestion by increased cardiac filling pressures two weeks prior to other markers of congestion such as weight gain or patient symptoms. Corrected flow time (FTc) measured by ultrasound, is an easy to perform vascular measure and correlates with cardiac filling pressures. Despite the relationship between FTc and filling pressures, this measure has never been studied in HF. The primary aim is to determine if FTc can predict patients at risk of readmission within 30 days. As a secondary aim, the investigators plan to validate a small study of patients reporting the ability of pulmonary ultrasound to predict readmissions. This study demonstrated pulmonary ultrasound was 100% sensitive and 68% specific for predicting readmission at 3 months, however this investigation was small and validation is needed. It is expected ultrasound will be able to accurately and safely predict patients who will be readmitted within 30 days of discharge. This proposal is aimed at identifying a noninvasive measure to better assess congestion from HF and predict readmissions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
187

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02119
        • Boston University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English Speaking
  • Being admitted for heart failure with expected hospital stay of 72 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Heart Failure
Patients admitted to the hospital with acute decompensated heart failure expected to be hospitalized for at least 72 hours
Other: Vascular and Pulmonary Ultrasound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Corrected Flow Time
Time Frame: Measured daily during hospitalization and then correlated to 30 day readmissions.Mean hospitalization for the study population is 9 days, but will be measured during the duration of their hospitalization.
Daily corrected flow time measures will be obtained during hospitalization. Mean hospitalization time for the study population is 9 days, but will be measured during the duration of their hospitalization. Changes in corrected flow time values will be assessed for associations with 30 day return visits. 30 Day returns will be determined by medical record review as well as follow up phone calls to patients. Corrected Flow Time is a single measure performed serial with the same units of measure.
Measured daily during hospitalization and then correlated to 30 day readmissions.Mean hospitalization for the study population is 9 days, but will be measured during the duration of their hospitalization.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pulmonary Ultrasound (B-Lines)
Time Frame: Measured daily during hospitalization and correlated to 30 day readmissions. Mean hospitalization time for the study population is 9 days, but will be measured during the duration of hospitalization.
Daily pulmonary ultrasound measures will be obtained during hospitalization. Mean hospitalization time for the study population is 9 days, but will be measured for the duration of their hospitalization. Changes in lung ultrasound values will be assessed for associations with 30 day return visits. 30 Day returns will be determined by medical record review as well as follow up phone calls to patients. Lung Ultrasound is a single measure performed serial with the same units of measure.
Measured daily during hospitalization and correlated to 30 day readmissions. Mean hospitalization time for the study population is 9 days, but will be measured during the duration of hospitalization.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boston Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Emergency Medicine Foundation
Heart Failure Society of America

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Joseph Pare, MD MHS RDMS, Assistant Professor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 30, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 14, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 1, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H-35112

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings