Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling-reposition to Treat Idiopathic Macular Holes

May 11, 2021 updated by: Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Comparing the Surgical Outcomes of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling-reposition Versus Peeling in Idiopathic Macular Holes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

To compare the morphologic and functional outcomes of internal limiting membrane peeling-reposition versus peeling in idiopathic macular holes

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This randomized clinical trial will be performed at a single center. Eligible patients with idiopathic macular holes will be equally randomized to internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling-reposition group or ILM peeling group through computer-aided random allocation.

A standard 3-port pars plana vitrectomy was performed by a single surgeon using the Constellation 23 gauge vitrectomy system (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, USA).After posterior vitreous detachment was achieved, peeling of the ILM was performed by an end gripping forceps with the assistance of Brilliant Blue G. In ILM peeling-reposition group, the peeled ILM flap is flatten back to peeled area with assistance of perfluoro-n-octane. In ILM peeling group, a round shape with 2.5 to 3.5 disc diameter of ILM is peeled. This is followed by a complete fluid-gas exchange. Patients are encouraged to maintain a face-down position for two weeks postoperatively in two groups.

Postoperative measurements of BCVA and spectral domain optical coherence tomography(SD-OCT) are conducted at 1,3 and 6-month follow-up visits by independent masked observers. Macular light sensitivity and fixation stability are determined with microperimetry at 1,3, and 6 months of follow-up. Mf-ERG, M-score chart and VFQ-25 chart are performed 1,3, and 6 months of follow-up.

Comparison of BCVA, anatomical closure were primarily performed between the two groups. Then, the morphologic changes of inner retina and the functional parameters measured from microperimetry, Mf-ERG, M-score chart, VFQ-25 chart were analyzed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Shanghai, China, 200000
        • Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patients are diagnosed as macular hole by optical coherence tomography.
  • Age ranges from 50 to 80 years.
  • The patients have indication for surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Traumatic macular hole.
  • Combined with serious epiretinal membrane.
  • Combined with diabetic retinopathy, hypertensive retinopathy.
  • Combined with other ocular diseases, such as keratitis，uveitis，retinal vasculitis.
  • - 6.0 diopters or more of spherical equivalent, 26mm or more of axial length.
  • History of intraocular surgery.
  • Presence of staphyloma.
  • Other ocular diseases that could influence macular microstructure or visual function

Exit criteria:

  • For reposition group, the patients will exit the research if the peeled ILM cannot reposition successfully.
  • Due to adverse events, especially severe adverse events, the researchers consider withdrawal of patients based on concerns of safety and ethics;
  • Drop out;
  • The patients voluntarily withdraw the informed consent;
  • Serious violation of the study protocol due to the subjects or investigators' reasons;
  • Other reasons that the researchers believe for quitting the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: peeling-reposition
After dying with Brilliant Blue G (Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany) with the help of Constellation 23-gauge vitrectomy system (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, TX), the intervention of "peeling-reposition" was used to peel and unfold the ILM. And the postoperative posture would be prone position in two weeks for all patients after the operation.
Procedure: peeling-reposition
After dying with Brilliant Blue G (BBG, Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany), a horizontal ILM strip is peeled off in inferior quadrant of macular area. Then the ILM was peeled from inferior to superior area continuously. The" ILM roll " was unfolded with assistance of perfluoro-n-octane (PFO). Finally, the position of the fixed ILM flap is adjusted under PFO bubble using flute needle or forceps.This was followed by a complete fluid-gas exchange using 14% perfluoropropane gas.Patients are introduced to maintain facedown position for two weeks postoperatively.
Drug: Brilliant Blue G
We intravitreal injected 0.1ml of Brilliant Blue G (Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany) to dye ILM before ILM peeling.
Other Names:
  • BBG
Other: postoperative posture
Patients of both two groups need to keep prone position for two weeks after the operation.
Device: Constellation 23-gauge vitrectomy system
All surgical procedures are operated on the Constellation 23-gauge vitrectomy system (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, TX).
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: peeling
After dying with Brilliant Blue G (Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany) with the help of Constellation 23-gauge vitrectomy system, the intervention of "peeling" was used to grasped ILM with end-gripping forceps. And the postoperative posture would be prone position in two weeks for all patients after the operation.
Drug: Brilliant Blue G
We intravitreal injected 0.1ml of Brilliant Blue G (Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany) to dye ILM before ILM peeling.
Other Names:
  • BBG
Other: postoperative posture
Patients of both two groups need to keep prone position for two weeks after the operation.
Device: Constellation 23-gauge vitrectomy system
All surgical procedures are operated on the Constellation 23-gauge vitrectomy system (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, TX).
Procedure: peeling
After dying with Brilliant Blue G (Brilliant Blue; Gender, Germany), a horizontal ILM strip is peeled off in inferior quadrant of macular area. Then, the strand of ILM was peeled off radially from the foveal center to vascular arcade. In result, a round -shaped with 2.5-3.5 disc diameter ILM -peeled area was created.This was followed by a complete fluid-gas exchange using 14% perfluoropropane gas. Patients are encourage to maintain facedown position for two weeks postoperatively.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)
Time Frame: Pre-operation and 6 months after operation
Change from baseline BCVA at 6 months after operation, examined with snellen chart.
Pre-operation and 6 months after operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Close rate of macular holes
Time Frame: 1 month after operation
Observed from optical coherence tomography
1 month after operation

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morphologic changes of inner retina
Time Frame: 1，3，6 months after operation
Dimpling observed from optical coherence tomography
1，3，6 months after operation
Central retinal thickness change
Time Frame: Pre-operation and 1，3，6 months after operation
Measured by software in optical coherence tomography
Pre-operation and 1，3，6 months after operation
Mean foveal light sensitivity change
Time Frame: Pre-operation and 1，3，6 months after operation
Measured by microperimetry
Pre-operation and 1，3，6 months after operation
Fixation stability change
Time Frame: Pre-operation and 1，3，6 months after operation
Measured by microperimetry
Pre-operation and 1，3，6 months after operation
Multifocal electroretinogram(Mf-ERG) change
Time Frame: pre-operation and 1，3，6 months after operation
An objective measurement of retinal functions
pre-operation and 1，3，6 months after operation
M-chart score change
Time Frame: Pre-operation and 1，3，6 months after operation
M-horizontal score and M-vertical score
Pre-operation and 1，3，6 months after operation
Visual function questionnaire-25(VFQ-25) score change
Time Frame: Pre-operation and 1，3，6 months after operation
A questionnaire consisted of 25 visual function questions concerning life quality
Pre-operation and 1，3，6 months after operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Peiquan Zhao, PhD, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 30, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 11, 2017

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 11, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • XH-16-049

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will be shared after the end of this clinical trails.The data included patients' serial number, gender, age, laterality and all outcome measurement

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After enrollment completed; After the last followup of the last participant.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Clinical Trials on peeling-reposition

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings