3D Planned Surgery of Acute Fractures Performed With 3D Guides Printed at the Point of Care (3DFRG)

December 5, 2023 updated by: Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

3D Planned Surgery of Acute Fractures Performed With 3D Guides Printed at the Point of Care - a Prospective Case Series

The aim of the study is to assess the accuracy of fracture reduction performed with surgical guides designed and 3D printed at the point of care in comminuted fractures of femur- and tibia-shaft.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The 3D planning of surgeries and their execution with 3D printed templates adapted to the individual patient is an established procedure for elective surgeries such as corrective osteotomies for mal-united fractures. Currently, the planning and production of 3D templates are performed mainly by external companies. The duration until delivery usually exceeds four weeks. Therefore, it is not possible to use them in acute cases (e.g. acute fractures) that need to be treated surgically within a few days.

The most frequent postoperative deformity in long bone shaft fractures is malrotation. In femoral fractures, clinically relevant rotational errors (>15°) occur in up to 40% of cases after surgical treatment, which either results in a poor clinical outcome or requires revision surgery. In tibial diaphyseal fractures, up to 50% of rotational errors have been reported. The higher the degree of comminution the higher the chances of malrotation postoperatively. Due to the comminuted situation, no reliable bony references exist intraoperatively and the surgeon can only estimate the correct length, axis and, rotation based on the contralateral leg. This ultimately leads to a high number of revision surgeries or poor outcomes. Porcine and human cadaveric feasibility studies conducted by the study team utilizing site 3D planned and printed reduction guides showed excellent accuracy of fracture reduction.

This project aims to apply this technique to the clinical setting by conducting a clinical study. The accuracy of 3D planned surgery performed with surgical guides designed and printed at the point of care will be assessed and the complication rate will be compared to the known literature.

It was hypothesized that the mean deviation between the measured postoperative rotational alignment and planned rotation alignment in patients treated for comminuted fractures of femur- and tibia-shaft treated using 3D printed reposition guides will be less than 5°. Additionally, it was hypothesized that the rate of clinically relevant deviations between postoperative rotational alignment (e.g. 15°) and planned rotation in patients treated for comminuted fractures of femur- and tibia-shaft treated using 3D printed reposition guides will be less than 10%.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsklinik für Orthopädische Chirurgie und Traumatologie
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Silvan Hess, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 99 years
  • Comminuted shaft fracture of tibia or femur
  • Intact contralateral tibia or femur
  • Patient willing to participate and sign the informed consent
  • Clear indication of surgical treatment

Exclusion criteria:

  • Refusal to sign the informed consent
  • Abnormal contralateral bony anatomy (previous surgeries, poliomyelitis, previous injury, implants)
  • Pregnancy
  • Acute tumor or previous tumor disease
  • Acute infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 3D fracture reposition guide group
Comminuted tibial- or/and femur shaft fractures will be treated using 3D printed patient-specific repositions guides.
Comminuted tibial- or/and femur shaft fractures will be treated using 3D printed patient-specific repositions guides.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rotational deviation (Axial plane deviation) in degree
Time Frame: Between 1 to 7 days postoperative, depending on the patients status
Planned rotational alignment versus postoperative rotational alignment.
Between 1 to 7 days postoperative, depending on the patients status

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length deviation in mm
Time Frame: Between 1 to 7 days postoperative, depending on the patients status
Planed length versus postoperative length
Between 1 to 7 days postoperative, depending on the patients status
Frontal plane deviation in degree
Time Frame: Between 1 to 7 days postoperative, depending on the patients status
Planned varus/valgus alignment versus postoperative varus/valgus alignment
Between 1 to 7 days postoperative, depending on the patients status
Sagittal plane deviation in degree
Time Frame: Between 1 to 7 days postoperative, depending on the patients status
Planned flexion/extension of the proximal and distal fracture fragments compared to the postoperative position.
Between 1 to 7 days postoperative, depending on the patients status

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hecker Andreas, MD, Universitätsklinik für Orthopädische Chirurgie und Traumatologie

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fracture Tibia

Clinical Trials on Fracture reposition with 3D printed patient specific repositions guides

3
Subscribe