Acute Skeletal Muscle Wasting and Relation to Physical Function in Patients Requiring ECMO

September 23, 2017 updated by: Kate Hayes, The Alfred

Acute Skeletal Muscle Wasting and Relation to Physical Function in Patients Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

The purpose of this study is to describe the changes in quadriceps muscle size and quality over the first 10 days on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) using ultrasound imaging. This study will also examine the relationship between those changes and muscle strength and level of physical function at day 10 and day 20 after ECMO commencement.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The use of ECMO has increased dramatically in the past decade with improvements in technology and survival. Whilst it is a potentially life-saving intervention in a group of patients at high risk of death, it is both highly invasive and expensive. ECMO poses a dramatic physiological burden on patients with major long-term consequences. Among these, severe prolonged neuromuscular weakness is perhaps the most significant complication. Described clinically as intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICUAW), it is associated with prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation, delayed rehabilitation, increased hospital length of stay, and mortality with residual deficits in physical functional ability persisting up to 5 years following the ICU admission. The health value, to both patients and society, could be substantially improved if more patients achieved a complete recovery.

Muscle strength testing in the early stages of critical illness is limited, as it requires the patient to be awake, alert and cognitively intact, therefore delayed diagnosis of ICUAW due to inability of patients to complete muscle strength testing is common. Consequently, there is growing interest in the utility of ultrasound imaging to monitor the trajectory of muscle wasting and inform development of targeted interventions in these critically ill patients. Ultrasound imaging of skeletal muscle is a non-invasive, painless and radiation free technique that can provide objective, accurate and reliable data on skeletal muscle in these critically ill patients. This study will use ultrasound imaging to quantify the early change in skeletal muscle size and quality, and the relationship to strength and physical function in patients on ECMO. Risk stratification of patients with peripheral muscle wasting is vital for optimising clinical management, including development of improved rehabilitative strategies to improve recovery and optimise the risk/benefit profile of ECMO.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
      • Melbourne, Australia, 3181
        • Alfred Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult critically ill patients admitted to the ICU requiring ECMO

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (≥18 years)
  • Requiring ECMO for management of severe cardiac or respiratory failure
  • Likely to spend > 24 hours on ECMO

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of:
  • Any connective tissue disorders (e.g., Marfan's syndrome)
  • A proven or suspected acute primary brain process that is likely to result in global impairment of conscious level or cognition, such as traumatic brain injury, intracranial haemorrhage, stroke, or hypoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest or asphyxiation
  • Any neuromuscular conditions (e.g., multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, spinal cord injury, Guillain-Barre syndrome)
  • Any current cancer or chemotherapy
  • A cognitive impairment prior to the acute illness that is associated with admission to ICU that would impair capacity to follow verbal instructions Any current acute musculoskeletal injuries of hip, knee, and ankle
  • A pre-existing mobility impairment where the patient is unable to walk without assistance prior to the acute illness that is associated with admission to ICU (use of a walking stick or frame is not an exclusion)
  • A language barrier to patient comprehension, or where death is deemed imminent and inevitable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Observational cohort

Ultrasound measurement of quadriceps muscle size and echogenicity will be obtained at baseline (within 48 hours of ECMO commencement), 10 days and 20 days after baseline measurement.

Measures of muscle strength and highest mobility level will be obtained at day 10 and day 20 after baseline measurement in order to determine the relationship between these volitional measures and the ultrasound parameters.
Other: Observational cohort
Ultrasound assessment of quadriceps, muscle strength testing, highest mobility level

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in quadriceps muscle size as determined by ultrasound in patients requiring ECMO
Time Frame: 10 days
Change in quadriceps muscle size
10 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The Alfred

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kate Hayes, The Alfred

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 25, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 19, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 19, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 18, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 26, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 23, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 516/16

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on Observational cohort

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings