Cardiac Resynchronization in the Elderly
Cardiac Resynchronization in the Elderly: Piloting Pacemaker vs. Defibrillator Therapy (Randomized Trial)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
- Duke University Health System
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
- The Ohio State University
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Erie, Pennsylvania, United States, 16550
- UPMC Hamot
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
- UPMC
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15240
- Veterans Research Foundation of Pittsburgh
-
Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania, United States, 17043
- UPMC Pinnacle
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age >/= 75 years
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% by cardiac imaging including echocardiogram, nuclear imaging, cardiac catheterization, or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
- QRS width >120 ms on surface electrocardiogram
- New York Heart Association class II, III, or ambulatory IV for Heart Failure (HF)
- Patient undergoing de novo CRT device implantation of CRT-D device change-out for battery depletion
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient within 40 days of acute myocardial infarction
- Patient within 3 months of cardiac revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery)
- Patient with prior history of cardiac arrest or documented sustained ventricular arrhythmia
- Patient with expected longevity < 1 year
- Patient not on optimal medical therapy for HF management including when tolerated β-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers
- Patient not planning to have his/her follow-up at participating institution
- Patient unable or unwilling to sign a written informed consent
- Patient's with dementia that are unable to consent for themselves
- Participating in any other clinical trials (observational/registries allowed)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Randomized- Pacemaker (CRT-P)
Cardiac resynchronization therapy Pacemaker
|
Patients randomized to the pacemaker arm will receive a CRT-P device.
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Randomized- Defibrillator (CRT-D)
Cardiac resynchronization therapy Defibrillator
|
Patients randomized to the defibrillator arm will receive a CRT-D device.
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Observational- Pacemaker (CRT-P)
Cardiac resynchronization therapy Pacemaker (CRT-P): Patients in this arm declined randomization in the trial and elected to participate in the observational registry
|
Patients randomized to the pacemaker arm will receive a CRT-P device.
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Observational- Defibrillator (CRT-D)
Cardiac resynchronization therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D): Patients in this arm declined randomization in the trial and elected to participate in the observational registry
|
Patients randomized to the defibrillator arm will receive a CRT-D device.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Enrollment
Time Frame: At 1 year after start of the study
|
Rates of enrollment of participants in this randomized trial
|
At 1 year after start of the study
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
QOL
Time Frame: At 6 months after enrollment
|
Quality of life of CRT-P versus CRT-D recipients using Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaires.
The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure scale ranges from 0 to 105, in which a lower score indicates a better outcome.
The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Physical subscale ranges from 0 to 40 and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Mental subscale ranges from 0 to 25. Lower scores on the subscales indicate a better outcome.
|
At 6 months after enrollment
|
|
QOL2
Time Frame: At 6 months after enrollment
|
QOL of CRT-P versus CRT-D recipients using RAND-36.
The RAND-36 is a normalized scale with a range of 0 to 100, in which a higher score is indicative of a better outcome.
PCS-T and MCS-T are the two summary components of the RAND-36.
The subscales PCS-T and MCS-T are both normalized with a range of 0 to 100.
Higher scores on the subscales indicate a better outcome.
|
At 6 months after enrollment
|
|
Retention
Time Frame: At 6 months after enrollment
|
Rates of retention of participants in this randomized trial
|
At 6 months after enrollment
|
|
Health Care Cost
Time Frame: At 6 months after enrollment
|
Cost of health care between CRT-P and CRT-D recipients.
|
At 6 months after enrollment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Samir Saba, MD, University of Pittsburgh
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Althouse AD, Jain SK, Shalaby A, Singh M, Weiss R, Myaskovsky L, Al-Khatib SM, Saba S. Feasibility of a Randomized Clinical Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With or Without an Implantable Defibrillator in Older Patients. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022 Apr;15(4):e010795. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010795. Epub 2022 Mar 31. No abstract available.
- Dhande M, Myaskovsky L, Althouse A, Singh M, Weiss R, Shalaby A, Al-Khatib SM, Topoll A, Jain S, Saba S. Quality of Life and Type of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device in Older Heart Failure Patients. J Palliat Med. 2023 Apr;26(4):481-488. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0217. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PRO17010015
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.