Anal HPV Infection and Risk for Anal High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Among Thai MSM With Acute HIV Infection

November 22, 2024 updated by: Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre

SEARCH Thailand and Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre

1. To determine the prevalence and incidence of anal HSIL and associated risk factors among MSM who initiate ART during AHI.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Anal human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is very common in men who have sex with men (MSM).1-3 HIV-positive MSM have a higher prevalence of anal HPV infection than HIV-negative MSM and are more likely to have infection with multiple HPV types.1,2 Spontaneous clearance of anal HPV infection is less common among HIV- positive compared with HIV-negative MSM.2 Persistent anal HPV infection, particularly with high-risk HPV types, is an important risk factor for the development of anal cancer.4-6 The incidence of anal cancer among HIV-positive MSM is very high, ranging from 75 to 137 per 100,000 person-years, and is five times higher than that in HIV-negative MSM.7-10 Anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) is the putative precursor of anal cancer.11-13 Anal squamous intraepithelial lesion has a dynamic picture of temporal progression and regression, but HSIL is much less likely to regress than low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL).10,14 A recent systematic review and meta-analysis showed the pooled prevalence of anal HSIL to be 29.1% in HIV-positive MSM and 21.5% in HIV-negative MSM.15 Anal HSIL incidence ranged from 8.5 to 15.4% per year in HIV-positive MSM and 3.3 to 6.0% per year in HIV-negative MSM. Although data are limited, previous studies have shown a 9-15% progression rate from anal HSIL to anal cancer during a median follow-up of 3 - 5 years. 11-13 Previous research at the Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre has demonstrated high rates of HPV infection and anal HSIL among Thai MSM, with HIV-positive MSM disproportionately affected. Prevalence of anal infection with high-risk HPV types was 57.5% in HIV-positive and 36.6% in HIV-negative MSM (p = 0.008).16 Prevalence of anal HSIL was 18.9% in HIV-positive MSM and 11.4% in HIV-negative MSM (p = 0.1), while incidence of anal HSIL over 12 months was 29% and 8%, respectively (p=0.001).17 HIV-positive MSM in that study, however, were mainly naïve to antiretroviral therapy (ART) at enrollment (87% not on ART) and only 10% had undetectable HIV viral load at baseline.

It is not clear if the higher rates of HPV infection and persistence of infection are due to HIV infection or to different risk behavior among HIV-positive MSM. Data are inconclusive on whether the use of ART has an effect on anal HPV infection among HIV-positive MSM.18-19 Furthermore, there is no data on the effect that "early diagnosis" of HIV infection and "early treatment" with ART might have on incidence and persistence of HPV infection or on the development of anal HSIL.

We propose a longitudinal, observational study of HPV infection and anal HSIL among HIV-positive Thai MSM who initiate ART during acute HIV infection (AHI). The hypothesis is that early HIV diagnosis and early ART within the first 4 weeks of infection will mitigate immunological and virological factors that increase HPV persistence and anal HSIL incidence in HIV-positive MSM such that these measure will be significantly lower when compared to historical controls of chronically-infected HIV-positive Thai MSM.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Thailand
    • Bangkok
      • Pathum Wan, Bangkok, Thailand, 10330
        • The Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 years or above.
  2. Born biological male.
  3. Self-identifies as MSM or transgender woman.
  4. Enrolled in the SEARCH010/RV254 cohort.
  5. In the stage of acute HIV infection diagnosed within 7 days (Fiebig I-V).
  6. Agrees to start ART during acute HIV infection.
  7. Had sex with a male partner at least once in the previous 3 months
  8. Consents to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Any history of previous HSIL diagnosis or treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: sample size 100
Study Design: This is a prospective observational cohort of Thai MSM who initiated ART at the time of AHI, defined as the first 30 days after HIV acquisition (Fiebig stages 1 through 5). Volunteers will be examined at baseline to determine the prevalence of HPV infection and HSIL at HIV diagnosis. They will then be followed longitudinally for new incidence of HPV and HSIL, as well as progression or regression of existing lesions.
Behavioral: SEARCH010/RV254

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The prevalence and incidence of anal HSIL among MSM who initiate ART during AHI will be lower than among chronically-infected HIV-positive MSM, Anal HSIL is diagnosed based on histology specimen and cytology (2001 Bethesda system)
Time Frame: 12 months

The prevalence of anal HSIL and the incidence of anal HSIL during the follow-up period. Anal HSIL is diagnosed based on histology specimen. A composite anal HSIL outcome (including both cytologic HSIL/ASC-H and histologic HSIL) will also be used.

Incidence of HSIL during the follow-up period will be calculated as the number of new diagnoses per person time at risk. 95% confidence intervals (CI) will be calculated assuming a Poisson distribution. Cox proportional hazards regression will be used to identify factors associated with incident HSIL.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
amfAR, The Foundation for AIDS Research
TREAT Asia
SEARCH Research Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nittaya Phanuphak, M.D.,Ph.D., The Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 23, 2017

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 22, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HPV in MSM with AHI

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Human Papillomavirus Infection

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings