Predictors of Time to Viremia With an Analytic Treatment Interruption

December 1, 2017 updated by: University of Minnesota

This is a two-center study of 30 HIV-infected participants who have been on antiretroviral therapy (ART) for at least two years.

Participants will be asked to undergo LN and GALT biopsies both before and after a closely monitored analytic treatment interruption (ATI).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The HIV field has made a dramatic shift to an emphasis on finding a cure for HIV.

However, there is no agreed upon test of cure, or even what the definition of a cure might be. The investigator believes the most reliable test of cure will be an analytic treatment interruption (ATI) with time to viremia as a standard measure of the impact of an intervention on the degree to which the reservoir has been depleted. This is rational as modeling studies utilizing ATI data point to reservoir size as an important predictor of time to viremia(1) and other studies have shown that levels of HIV DNA(2) and cell associated HIV RNA(3) prior to starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) are associated with time-to-rebound. However, these studies used a limited sampling strategy to determine when viremia rebounded and it is likely that greater sensitivity in measures of time-to rebound will be needed to accurately assess the impact of an intervention. The investigators have tested an ATI strategy where plasma HIV is sampled three times each week and ART is resumed once the virus becomes detectable. In this small, pilot study, the investigators sampled lymph nodes, GALT, plasma, and PBMC before, during, and after the ATI and found the time-to-rebound was 14 days (range 5 to 30 days) and that total years of ART exposure was associated with the time-to-rebound (4). The investigators propose a similar study that includes more intensive blood and lymphoid tissue sampling to identify factors that predict time to-rebound to provide a necessary foundation for future studies that utilize a treatment interruption as a test of efficacy for curative interventions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States
        • University of California
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

30 HIV-infected participants who have been on antiretroviral therapy (ART) for at least two years.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. HIV-infected individuals who have been on ART therapy for at least two years
  2. Male or Female, aged 18 years or older
  3. Documented evidence of CD4+ T cell count ≥ 300 cells/µl for 12 months prior to study entry
  4. BMI ≤ 30 or evidence by ultrasound or physical exam of peripheral inguinal lymph node(s) that is/are surgically accessible
  5. Documented plasma HIV RNA levels below level of quantification <20 to <40 copies RNA/mL depending on the assay) ≥ 24 months (a single measurement above the level of detection but < 200 copies/ml will be allowed)
  6. Willing to switch to an ART regimen consisting of dolutegravir and either tenofovir/emtricitabine or abacavir/lamivudine to avoid drugs with a long-half life that would expose the participant to a period of mono-therapy when the drugs are stopped.
  7. Women of child bearing potential and men with partners of child bearing potential must agree to use effective contraception during protocol
  8. Able to provide voluntary written consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. ART was initiated during acute infection (within first 6 months of infection)
  2. Planning or current pregnancy or breastfeeding
  3. History and/or presence of any clinically significant disease or disorder, such as cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, hepatic, neurological, gastrointestinal and psychiatric/mental disease/disorder, which, in the opinion of the enrolling physician, may put the participant at risk because of participation in the study, influence the results of the study, or affect the participant's ability to participate in the study.
  4. Inability to comply with study procedures per enrolling physician discretion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
HIV-infected on antiretroviral therapy 2 years
HIV-infected participants who have been on antiretroviral therapy (ART) for at least two years.
Other: Blood Testing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to viremia
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
Time to viremia
Baseline to 14 days
Change in vRNA+ and vDNA+ cells
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
measured by in situ hybridization and using quantitative image analysis to determine the frequency of + cell/gram lymphoid tissue
Baseline to 14 days
SCA (Single Copy Assay)
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
performed as described in the protocol and reported as number of cells/ml plasma.
Baseline to 14 days
Change in markers of immune activation
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
All measurements are the same IL1B, TNF, IL4, IL13, IL17, IL21,IL22, IL6, IL10
Baseline to 14 days
Change in CD4
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
Baseline to 14 days
Change in CD4/CD8 ratio
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
Baseline to 14 days
Polyadenylation-RT-ddPCR assay for total transcripts (TAR)
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
transcripts/million cells
Baseline to 14 days
ddPCR assays for read-through, elongated, polyadenylated, and multiply-spliced (Tat-Rev) transcripts
Time Frame: Baseline to 14 days
reported as transcripts/million cells
Baseline to 14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Minnesota

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Timothy Schacker, MD, University of Minnesota

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 25, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 4, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 1, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 24777

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on Blood Testing

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings