Impact of a Systematic Social Work Driven Approach on Medical Power of Attorney Documentation, Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs in Participants With Stage I-IV Gynecological Cancers

April 30, 2025 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Preparing Patients and Family Caregivers for Medical Decision Making: Evaluating the Impact of a Systematic Social Work Driven Approach on Medical Power of Attorney Documentation, Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs

This trial evaluates the impact of a systemic social work driven approach on medical power of attorney documentation, knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs in participants with stage I-IV gynecological cancers. Social work counseling and education may help increase the number of participants who complete medical power of attorney documents. Counseling and education may also affect attitudes about decision-making and willingness to take part in these conversations in participants with stage I-IV gynecological cancers and their family members and/or caregivers.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate medical power of attorney documents (MPOAD) completion rate after a systematic social work counseling and education clinical process.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine change in medical power of attorney (MPOA)/primary family caregivers' knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about conditions for quality surrogate medical decision-making (MDM).

II. To determine change in MPOA/primary family caregivers' knowledge of patients' values and goals for MDM.

III. Evaluate patients' and MPOA/primary family caregivers' willingness to participate in future advance care planning discussions to discuss patients' values and goals important to MDM.

IV. Evaluate predictors of patient subgroups most likely to respond to the social work counseling and education clinical process.

V. Explore aspects of the Spanish language version of the advance care planning engagement survey to inform future validation studies.

OUTLINE:

Participants (patients and family caregiver/MPOA) complete questionnaires about knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of MPOAD. Participants without a MPOAD watch a 4-minute educational video about the importance of the role of MPOA.

After completion of intervention, participants are followed up at 3 months.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
731

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PATIENTS
  • Diagnosis of invasive gynecologic malignancy stages 1-4.
  • New patient in the Gynecologic Oncology Center.
  • Adequate capacity to understand and complete MPOAD in the opinion of the study investigator or research assistant.
  • Able to speak and understand English and/or Spanish.
  • Provision of Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved informed consent.
  • Available MPOA or primary family caregiver who consents to study participation.
  • FAMILY CAREGIVER/MPOA
  • MPOA or if none documented in electronic health record (EHR), primary family caregiver, as designated by the patient.
  • Permission to contact provided by patient.
  • Adequate capacity to understand and complete study measures in the opinion of the study investigator or research assistant.
  • Provision of IRB-approved informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Without a MPOA or available family caregiver.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Supportive Care (questionnaires, educational video)
Participants (patients and family caregiver/MPOA) complete questionnaires about knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of MPOAD. Participants without a MPOAD watch a 4-minute educational video about the importance of the role of MPOA.
Other: Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Other: Questionnaire Administration
Complete questionnaires about MPOAD
Other: Video
Watch educational video

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients who decline to participate in the study
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Will be reported with 95% confidence intervals. Descriptive demographic and disease characteristics for patients who decline study participation but allow collection of demographic and disease characteristics will be compared to those of participating patients.
Up to 3 months
Proportion of patients who already have medical power of attorney (MPOAD) at consult
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Will be reported with 95% confidence intervals. Baseline and changes in MPOA/primary family caregivers' knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about conditions for quality surrogate medical decision-making (MDM), in patients/primary family caregivers' self-efficacy and readiness for MPOA, and in patients/Primary family caregivers' knowledge of patients' values and goals for MDM, will be summarized and compared among the four patient groups: 1) had MPOAD at the consult already, 2) complete MPOAD at the first visit, 3) complete MPOAD after initial social work counselor visit and by 3 months, 4) do not complete MPOAD by 3 months, using Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and either Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for discrete variables, whenever appropriate. Univariate/multi-covariate logistic regression will be employed to evaluate the effect of potential factors on completion of MPOAD.
Up to 3 months
Proportion of patients who completed MPOAD at the first social work counselor visit
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Will be reported with 95% confidence intervals. Baseline and changes in MPOA/primary family caregivers' knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about conditions for quality surrogate MDM, in patients/primary family caregivers' self-efficacy and readiness for MPOA, and in patients/Primary family caregivers' knowledge of patients' values and goals for MDM, will be summarized and compared among the four patient groups: 1) had MPOAD at the consult already, 2) complete MPOAD at the first visit, 3) complete MPOAD after initial social work counselor visit and by 3 months, 4) do not complete MPOAD by 3 months, using Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and either Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for discrete variables, whenever appropriate. Univariate/multi-covariate logistic regression will be employed to evaluate the effect of potential factors on completion of MPOAD.
Up to 3 months
Proportion of participants who completed MPOAD after the first educational video
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Will be reported with 95% confidence intervals. Baseline and changes in MPOA/primary family caregivers' knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about conditions for quality surrogate MDM, in patients/primary family caregivers' self-efficacy and readiness for MPOA, and in patients/Primary family caregivers' knowledge of patients' values and goals for MDM, will be summarized and compared among the four patient groups: 1) had MPOAD at the consult already, 2) complete MPOAD at the first visit, 3) complete MPOAD after initial social work counselor visit and by 3 months, 4) do not complete MPOAD by 3 months, using Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and either Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for discrete variables, whenever appropriate. Univariate/multi-covariate logistic regression will be employed to evaluate the effect of potential factors on completion of MPOAD.
Up to 3 months
Proportion of participants who completed MPOAD within 3 months after the educational video
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Will be reported with 95% confidence intervals. Baseline and changes in MPOA/primary family caregivers' knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about conditions for quality surrogate MDM, in patients/primary family caregivers' self-efficacy and readiness for MPOA, and in patients/Primary family caregivers' knowledge of patients' values and goals for MDM, will be summarized and compared among the four patient groups: 1) had MPOAD at the consult already, 2) complete MPOAD at the first visit, 3) complete MPOAD after initial social work counselor visit and by 3 months, 4) do not complete MPOAD by 3 months, using Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and either Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for discrete variables, whenever appropriate. Univariate/multi-covariate logistic regression will be employed to evaluate the effect of potential factors on completion of MPOAD.
Up to 3 months
Willingness to participate in future advance care planning discussions
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Willingness to participate in future Advance Care Planning discussions for patients' values and goals important to MDM will be tabulated.
Up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Donna S Zhukovsky, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 17, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 16, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 16, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 27, 2017

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 31, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 30, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2016-0704 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • NCI-2018-01745 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malignant Female Reproductive System Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire Administration

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings