Impact of Double-layer Versus Single-layer Uterine Closure Suture in Cesarean Section on the Development of Postoperative Uterine Scar Deficiency
Impact of Double-layer Versus Single-layer Uterine Closure Suture in Cesarean Section on the Development of Postoperative Uterine Scar Deficiency: A Randomized Controlled Trial
In recent decades, the rate of cesarean section delivery has steadily increased worldwide ranging at 30% of deliveries, thus long-term risks after cesarean section need to be evaluated. Postoperative risks include, among others, uterine scar rupture and placental complications such as placenta previa and accreta- complications, which are possibly associated with uterine scar dehiscence.
The prevalence of lower-segment uterine scar deficiency has previously been described as 63%. One recent systematic review and meta analysis investigated closure techniques of low transverse cesarean. No significant difference in risk of uterine scar defect comparing single layer versus double layer closure could be detected (RR 0.53), whereas in women with single layer closure, a lower residual myo-metrial thickness was observed (-2.6mm). However, the authors do conclude that data is insufficient to determine the risk of uterine rupture, dehiscence or gynecological outcomes due to insufficient power of available studies. A recently published Randomized Controlled Trial concluded that double-layer closure with unlocked first layer showed a better scar healing than locked single layer.
The investigators main objective is to identify if single-layer suture of the uterus during cesarean section results in a higher rate of cesarean scar deficiency than double-layer suture.
Interventions
Single- layer versus double- layer uterine closure Two different techniques of uterine closure in cesarean section will be compared: single- layer versus double- layer continuous uterotomy suture.
Standardized transvaginal sonography
Transvaginal ultrasound examination is carried out by one expert sonographer. The ultrasound machine used for all examinations is GE Voluson E10.
Primary outcome: CS scar deficiency visualized in transvaginal ultrasound at 3 months after CS (yes/no).
Secondary outcome: Myometrial thickness at the site of uterine scar (mm).
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Marianne Koch, Dr.
- Phone Number: 0043 1 40400 29150
- Email: marianne.koch@meduniwien.ac.at
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Samir Helmy-Bader, Dr.
- Phone Number: 0043 1 40400 29150
- Email: samir.helmy@meduniwien.ac.at
Study Locations
-
-
-
Vienna, Austria
- Recruiting
- Medical University of Vienna
-
Contact:
- Samir Helmy, Ass.Prof.
- Phone Number: +4314040029150
- Email: samir.helmy@meduniwien.ac.at
-
Contact:
- Marianne Koch, Dr.
- Phone Number: +4314040029150
- Email: marianne.koch@meduniwien.ac.at
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- First cesarean section
- Scheduled cesarean section at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Informed Consent
- Cesarean section at ≥ 37+0 weeks of gestation
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous cesarean section
- Emergency cesarean section
- Cesarean section < 37+0 weeks of gestation
- Corporal incision during cesarean section
- Diseases which favor wound healing disruptions (e.g. chronic inflammatory diseases)
- Uterine anatomic anomalies
- BMI > 35kg/m2
- Placenta previa
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: single-layer continuous uterotomy suture
Single-layer continuous uterotomy suture
|
|
|
Active Comparator: double-layer continuous uterotomy suture
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Cesarean section (CS) scar deficiency visualized in transvaginal ultrasound at 3 months after CS (yes/no).
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Myometrial thickness at the site of uterine scar (mm).
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
The presence or absence of a CS scar pregnancy in a consecutive pregnancy
Time Frame: up to 25 years
|
up to 25 years
|
|
Occurence of uterine rupture in a consecutive pregnancy
Time Frame: up to 25 years
|
up to 25 years
|
|
CS scar deficiency visualized in transvaginal ultrasound (yes/no) in early pregnancy in a consecutive pregnancy
Time Frame: up to 25 years
|
up to 25 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Silver RM. Abnormal Placentation: Placenta Previa, Vasa Previa, and Placenta Accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):654-668. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001005.
- Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E, Yazbek J, Lee C, Gonzalez J, Jurkovic D. Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;31(1):72-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.5200.
- Roberge S, Demers S, Berghella V, Chaillet N, Moore L, Bujold E. Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;211(5):453-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
- Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Jul;66(1):89-92.
- Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;99(6):976-80. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02002-1.
- Miller DA, Chollet JA, Goodwin TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta previa-placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jul;177(1):210-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70463-0.
- Thurn L, Lindqvist PG, Jakobsson M, Colmorn LB, Klungsoyr K, Bjarnadottir RI, Tapper AM, Bordahl PE, Gottvall K, Petersen KB, Krebs L, Gissler M, Langhoff-Roos J, Kallen K. Abnormally invasive placenta-prevalence, risk factors and antenatal suspicion: results from a large population-based pregnancy cohort study in the Nordic countries. BJOG. 2016 Jul;123(8):1348-55. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13547. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
- Roberge S, Demers S, Girard M, Vikhareva O, Markey S, Chaillet N, Moore L, Paris G, Bujold E. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):507.e1-507.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.916. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
- Dodd JM, Anderson ER, Gates S, Grivell RM. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 22;(7):CD004732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004732.pub3.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1642/2016
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section
-
NCT06324331Not yet recruitingCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section Niche
-
NCT07406373CompletedPregnancy | Cesarean Section | Elective Cesarean Section
-
NCT05669300CompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; Dehiscence
-
NCT03644433UnknownCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; Complications, Wound, Dehiscence | Cesarean Section, Repeated | Cesarean, Uterine Scar Thickness | Cesarean, Residual Myometrial Thickness
-
NCT07241013RecruitingSkin Wound Healing After Cesarean Section | Cesarean Section Scar Healing
-
NCT04070118CompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; Dehiscence
-
NCT06513013Completed
-
NCT05314075Completed
-
NCT07050914Completed
-
NCT03741907Completed
Clinical Trials on uterine closure during cesarean section
-
NCT05100147CompletedCesarean Section Complications | Scar; Deformity
-
NCT06303817CompletedPain | Cesarean Section | Cosmetics Sensitivity
-
NCT07611331CompletedPelvic Pain | Metrorrhagia | Amenorrhea Secondary | Spotting | Cesarean Scar Defect (Isthmococele)
-
NCT05948436CompletedCesarean Section Complications | Postpartum Hemorrhage
-
NCT07228858CompletedCesarean Section Complications | Scarred Uterus | Scar Niche
-
NCT03182010Unknown
-
NCT05788354CompletedIntrauterine Contraceptive Device Complication
-
NCT00470288UnknownCesarean Delivery Procedures
-
NCT03124472Unknown
-
NCT07387380CompletedCesarean Delivery Procedures