Prostate Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

March 18, 2020 updated by: Andrew Picel, MD, University of California, San Diego
Investigator-initiated study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prostate artery embolization for the treatment lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a phase I/II, single center, prospective, single arm, investigational study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prostate artery embolization (PAE) for treatment of severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) related to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in patients that have either failed or are intolerant to medical management. Once eligibility is confirmed, patients will undergo PAE with Embosphere Microspheres. Embolization will consist of a minimally invasive angiogram and treatment of the prostate arteries with the Embosphere particles to reduce blood flow to the prostate. Following treatment, patients will return for follow-up visits at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months post PAE.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
9

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92007
        • University of California San Diego

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Prostate volume between 40 and 300 cm3

  2. Diagnosis of BPH with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) defined as at least one of the following:

    • a. IPSS greater than 18
    • b. IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) assessment greater than 3
    • c. Qmax less than 12 mL/sec
  3. Refractory or intolerant to medical management
  4. Ineligibility for or refusal of surgical management

  5. One of the following criteria:

    • a. Baseline prostate specific antigen (PSA) ≤2.5 ng/mL
    • b. Baseline PSA >2.5 ng/mL and ≤10 ng/mL AND free PSA ≥25% of total PSA
    • c. Baseline PSA >2.5 ng/mL and ≤10 ng/mL AND free PSA <25% of total PSA AND negative 12 core prostate biopsy in the past 12 months
    • d. Baseline PSA >10 ng/mL AND negative 12 core biopsy within the past 12 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of prostate, bladder or rectal malignancy. Biopsy proven urethral cancer.
  2. History of rectal disease
  3. Neurogenic bladder disorder due to multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injury, diabetes, etc., as demonstrated on urodynamic testing.
  4. Detrusor muscle failure, urethral stenosis, or urinary obstruction due to causes other than BPH, as demonstrated on urodynamic testing
  5. Bladder diverticula greater than 5 cm or bladder stones greater than 2 cm
  6. Cystolithiasis within the past three months
  7. Baseline serum creatinine greater than 1.8
  8. Evidence of tortuous or atherosclerotic blood vessels
  9. Presence of collateral vessel pathways potentially endangering normal territories during embolization that cannot be bypassed with the microcatheter
  10. Active urinary tract infection, interstitial cystitis, or prostatitis within the last 5 years
  11. Coagulation disturbances not normalized by medical treatment
  12. Allergy to iodinated contrast agents not responsive to steroid premedication regimen
  13. Previous radical pelvic or rectal surgery, or pelvic irradiation
  14. Prior surgical prostate intervention
  15. Treatment with beta-blocker, antihistamine, anticonvulsant, or antispasmodic medication within 1 week of treatment UNLESS there has been a stable voiding pattern while medicated with the drug(s) for 6 months
  16. Use of prostate active medications, including alpha blockers, anti-cholinergics, androgens, anti-androgens, gonadotropins-releasing hormonal analogs, PDE5-inhibitors, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors within 2 months of intervention, unless the medication is necessary to avoid symptom exacerbation and disability, in this case medication should not be initiated or dose adjusted within 1 month of study enrollment and dose should not be adjusted during the study period
  17. Interest in future fertility
  18. Mental condition or disorder that interferes with participants' ability to provide written informed consent
  19. Current severe or uncontrolled disease (metabolic, hematologic, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, neurologic, cardiac, infectious or gastrointestinal) that in the Investigator's judgment makes the patient unsuitable for trial inclusion due to increased risk of complications
  20. Known immunosuppression
  21. Life expectancy less than 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Prostate artery embolization
Single arm study of patients undergoing the prostate artery embolization procedure with Embosphere particles.
Device: Embosphere microparticles for prostate artery embolization
Pelvic angiograms will be performed and microspheres delivered to the arteries supplying the prostate to alleviate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 months
The study protocol was terminated before completion as the device was FDA approved and determined to be safe for the treated patient population.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 month
International Prostate Symptom Score change from baseline measured at 1 and 6 months. The IPSS scale grades lower urinary tract symptoms on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 35 (severe). Patients answer 7 questions about symptoms they have had in the past month and grade each symptom severity for each question on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (almost always). Change is reported as outcome measure time point minus baseline. A positive value indicates improved symptoms and negative value worsened symptoms.
baseline, 1 month, 6 month
Change in Post-void Residual (PVR) on Ultrasound
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 month
PVR (mL) change from baseline measured at 1 and 6 months. Change is reported as outcome measure time point minus baseline. A negative value indicates less post-void residual and a positive value indicates greater PVR at each outcome time point.
baseline, 1 month, 6 month
Change in Peak Urinary Flow Rate (Qmax)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 month
Change in Qmax measured at 1 and 6 months. Change is reported as outcome measure time point minus baseline. A positive value indicates improved Qmax and negative value indicates decreased Qmax at each outcome time point.
Baseline, 1 month, 6 month
Change in International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF)
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 month
IIEF score change from baseline measured at 1 and 6 months. International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) is a scale grading erectile function based on 5 questions. Questions are answered from 1 (low function) to 5 (high function). Total scores range from 5 to 25. A total score of 5-7 is severe erectile dysfunction, 8 to 11 is moderate erectile dysfunction, 12 to 16 is mild to moderate erectile dysfunction, 17 to 21 is mild erectile dysfunction, and 22-25 is no erectile dysfunction. Change is reported as outcome measure time point minus baseline. A positive value indicates improved erectile function and a negative indicates worsened erectile function.
baseline, 1 month, 6 month
Change in Prostate Volume (PV)
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 month
Change in prostate volume measured at 1 and 6 months. Change is reported as outcome measure time point minus baseline. A negative value indicates decreased prostate volume and a positive value indicates increased prostate volume.
baseline, 1 month, 6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, San Diego

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Andrew Picel, MD, UCSD Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 18, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 18, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 31, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 18, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 161719

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings