Brain Vascular Disease in Aging and Dementia

September 11, 2019 updated by: Adam Brickman, Columbia University

White Matter Hyperintensities in Aging and Dementia

This study examines the factors that may drive the relationship between vascular disease and Alzheimer's Disease (AD) in a large, longitudinal, multi-ethnic community-based cohort study of older adults in northern Manhattan, New York. In past research, the investigators demonstrated that accumulation of brain vascular disease is associated with risk for development of AD. The study now extends the research to examine how brain vascular disease and AD interact. In this pilot study, the investigators will obtain positron emission tomography (PET) scans to measure amyloid (one of the protein pathological markers of AD) from participants in an ongoing community-based study of aging and dementia (WHICAP). The study will include subjects who are already enrolled in the parent project. Further, this study will enroll both subjects who have never been evaluated with PET scans and those who received a previous baseline PET scan. The study plans to obtain approximately 30 repeat amyloid PET scans and 20 baseline PET scans. The investigators will also conduct transcranial Doppler studies to measure blood flow in the participants with amyloid PET scans. The potential benefits to society should be considerable if this study reveals new information about risk factors for or contributions to AD.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most devastating international public health epidemics. There are currently no effective disease-modifying or preventative strategies. Current pathogenic models emphasize a single pathway of disease pathogenesis, but underestimate the contribution of small vessel cerebrovascular disease, which manifests primarily as white matter hyperintensities (WMH) on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Understanding of the factors that drive the relationship between vascular disease and AD remains elusive; vascular factors may be independent sources of dysfunction that contribute additively to clinical expression, they may interact mechanistically with AD pathology, and/or they may relate to each other because of a shared association with a third set of factors. These issues are particularly relevant among ethnic/racial minorities, who are at much greater risk for clinical AD, have more severe cerebrovascular disease, but appear to have similar levels of AD pathology compared with Whites.

The proposed research examines these factors in a large, longitudinal, multi-ethnic community-based cohort study of older adults in northern Manhattan, New York. The investigators demonstrated that accumulation of WMH, particularly in parietal lobes, predicts incident AD, and is associated with the presence of cerebral microbleeds, an indicator of cerebral amyloid angiopathy. The investigators extend the research to examine mechanistic interactions between cerebrovascular disease and AD. The preliminary data suggest that individuals with evidence of fibrillar amyloidosis have increased parietal lobe WMH and that hemodynamic markers of autoregulatory dysfunction are associated with both WMH and amyloid deposition, which in turn interact to promote the clinical expression of AD. These findings are buffered by new data that establish WMH as a core feature in autosomal dominant forms of AD. In this pilot study, the investigators propose to obtain cross-sectional and longitudinal MRI and amyloid PET data from participants in WHICAP.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
48

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Potential participants are recruited from a list of active members in the Washington Heights/Hamilton Heights/ Inwood Columbia Aging Project, known as WHICAP (CU IRB# AAAO9804), who previously completed a repeat MRI as part of a neuroimaging sub-study (IRB# AAAO9758). Some participants (n=30) will already have had baseline amyloid PET imaging under PI IRB protocol # 7130R (BAY 949172PET/CT in Older Adults).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • current participant in WHICAP (Washington Heights/Inwood Columbia Aging Project)
  • subject previously participated in baseline MRI sub-study
  • post-menopausal

Exclusion Criteria:

  • allergic to Florbetaben
  • claustrophobic
  • liver problems
  • history of epilepsy/seizures
  • pre-menopausal
  • serious medical conditions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Group A
All participants will undergo an amyloid PET scan with Florbetaben F 18 contrast as well as a transcranial Doppler ultrasound.
Radiation: Florbetaben F18
10Meq of Florbetaben F 18 via intravenous injection is to be used. Visit duration is approximately 3 hours.
Procedure: Transcranial Doppler
All participants will undergo Doppler ultrasonography that measures the velocity of blood flow through the brain's blood vessels. Visit duration is approximately 45 minutes and will be scheduled for either the same day or another day as the PET scan.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PET amyloid Standard Uptake Value ratio (SUVr) values
Time Frame: up to 18 months
The primary outcome is the mean standard uptake value ratio in the 4 regions of interest.
up to 18 months
Transcranial Doppler (TCD) dynamic autoregulatory dysfunction
Time Frame: up to 18 months
Cerebral blood flow velocities (CBFV) are assessed using TCD. Arterial blood pressure (ABP) is recorded simultaneously using the Finapres on the middle phalanx of the left or right middle finger. The phase shift between the two streaming signals is an indication of the extent to which oscillations in CBFV lead those in ABP and can be interpreted as active early counter-regulation. Lower phase shift reflects increased latency in cerebral vasomotion and thus poorer autoregulation.
up to 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Columbia University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Aging (NIA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Adam M Brickman, PhD, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 23, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 6, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 11, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AAAR1423
  • 2R56AG034189-06A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dementia

Clinical Trials on Florbetaben F18

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings