A Long-term Safety Study of QMF149 in Japanese Participants With Asthma

January 27, 2020 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A Multicenter, Open-label, Single Arm, 52-week Treatment Study to Assess the Safety of QMF149 in Japanese Patients With Asthma

The purpose of this study was to provide long term safety data of QMF149 in Japanese participants with inadequately controlled asthma for the registration of QMF149 in Japan.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
51

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
    • Aichi
      • Nagoya, Aichi, Japan, 457-8511
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Fukuoka
      • Fukuoka-city, Fukuoka, Japan, 819-8555
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Hokkaido
      • Chitose-city, Hokkaido, Japan, 066-0021
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kitahiroshima, Hokkaido, Japan, 061-1121
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Sapporo-city, Hokkaido, Japan, 006-0811
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Sapporo-city, Hokkaido, Japan, 064-0801
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Kagawa
      • Takamatsu-city, Kagawa, Japan, 760-0018
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Kanagawa
      • Yokohama-city, Kanagawa, Japan, 223-0059
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Yokohama-city, Kanagawa, Japan, 231-8682
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan, 239-0821
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Nagano
      • Chino-city, Nagano, Japan, 391-0011
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Osaka
      • Higashiosaka-city, Osaka, Japan, 577-0843
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Tokyo
      • Chuo ku, Tokyo, Japan, 103 0027
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 103-0027
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Toshima-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 171-0014
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed.
  • Male and female adult patient ≥ 18 years old.
  • Patients with a diagnosis of persistent asthma for a period of at least 1 year prior to Visit 1.
  • Patients who have used medium or high dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus at least 1 controller for asthma for at least 3 months and at stable dose and regimen for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.
  • Patients must have Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 (ACQ-7) score ≥ 1.5 at Visits 2 and qualify for treatment with high dose ICS/long-acting β2 agonist (LABA).
  • Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) of ≥ 50% and ≤ 85% of the predicted normal value for the patient after withholding bronchodilators at Visit 2.
  • Repeating is allowed once only. Repeating of percentage predicted FEV1 should be done in an ad-hoc visit to be scheduled on a date that would provide sufficient time to receive confirmation from the spirometry data central reviewer of the validity of the assessment before Visit 99.

  • Patients must demonstrate reversibility defined as an increase in FEV1 of ≥ 12% and 200 mL within 15 to 30 minutes after administration of 400 µg of salbutamol at Visit 2. Spacer devices are permitted during reversibility testing only. The Investigator or delegate may decide whether or not to use a spacer for the reversibility testing.

    • If reversibility is not proven at Visit 2, patients may be permitted to enter the study with historical evidence of reversibility that was performed within 5 years prior to Visit 1.
    • Alternatively, patients may be permitted to enter the study with a historical positive bronchoprovocation test (defined as a provoked fall in FEV1 of 20% by bronchoconstriction agent e.g., methacholine, histamine) or equivalent test (e.g., astography) that was performed within 5 years prior to Visit 1.
    • Where patient is assessed as eligible based on historical evidence, a copy of the original printed report must be available as source documentation.
    • If reversibility is not proven at Visit 2 and historical data is not available, reversibility should be repeated once in an ad-hoc visit scheduled as close as possible from the first attempt (but not on the same day).
    • If reversibility is not demonstrated at Visit 2 (or after repeated assessment at ad-hoc visit) and historical evidence of reversibility/bronchoprovocation/astography is not available, patients must be screen failed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have had an asthma attack/exacerbation requiring systemic steroids or hospitalization or emergency room visit within 6 weeks of Visit 1.
  • Patients who have ever required intubation for a severe asthma attack/exacerbation.
  • Patients who have a clinical condition which is likely to be worsened by ICS administration (e.g. glaucoma, cataract and fragility fractures) who are according to investigator's medical judgment at risk participating in the study.
  • Patients who have had a respiratory tract infection or asthma worsening as determined by investigator within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 or between Visit 1 and Visit 99. Patients may be re-screened 4 weeks after recovery from their respiratory tract infection or asthma worsening.
  • Patients with a history of chronic lung diseases other than asthma, including (but not limited to) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sarcoidosis, interstitial lung disease, cystic fibrosis, clinically significant bronchiectasis and active tuberculosis.
  • Patients with severe narcolepsy and/or insomnia.
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women.
  • Women of child-bearing potential unless they are using highly effective methods of contraception during dosing and for 30 days after stopping of investigational medication.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: QMF149
All eligible patients take QMF149 150/320 μg once daily over 52 weeks.
Drug: QMF149
QMF149 150/320 μg once daily, delivered as powder in hard capsules via Concept1 inhaler

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Up to 52 weeks
A TEAE is any adverse event that started on or after the time of the first inhalation of study drug but not later than 7 days (30 days in the case of a SAE) after the last administration. A SAE is described as any adverse event that leads to death, is life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, causes or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, or any other important medical event which is medically significant.
Up to 52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline of Pre-Dose Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Measured After 26 And 52 Weeks Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 26 and 52
The pre-dose FEV1 was defined as the mean of the pre-dose 45 and 15 min FEV1 values prior to evening dose. FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation, measured through spirometry testing. A positive change from baseline in FEV1 indicates improvement in lung function.
Baseline, Weeks 26 and 52
Change From Baseline of Morning and Evening Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) During 52 Weeks Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 52
PEF is the greatest airflow rate achieved during forced exhalation with lungs fully inflated. PEF was analyzed separately in the morning and evening using an electronic Peak Flow Meter (ePEF). A positive change from baseline in PEF indicates improvement in lung function.
Baseline up to Week 52
Change From Baseline of Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) After 26 And 52 Weeks Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 26 and 52
The ACQ-7 is a seven-item disease-specific instrument developed and validated to assess asthma control in participants. It consists of five items to assess symptoms and activity limitations, one question to assess rescue medication use, and one question to assess airway caliber (FEV1% predicted). All seven items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating total control and 6 indicating poor control. The questions are equally weighted and the total score is the mean of the seven items. The first 6 questions of the ACQ-7 were completed by the participant while the last question (question 7) was completed by the study investigator using data from the Master Scope spirometer. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in lung function.
Baseline, Weeks 26 and 52
Responder Rate of Participants Achieving the Minimal Important Difference (MID) of ACQ-7 ≥ 0.5 After 26 And 52 Weeks Treatment
Time Frame: Weeks 26 and 52
The ACQ-7 is a seven-item disease-specific instrument developed and validated to assess asthma control in participants. It consists of five items to assess symptoms and activity limitations, one question to assess rescue medication use, and one question to assess airway caliber (FEV1% predicted). All seven items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating total control and 6 indicating poor control. The questions are equally weighted and the total score is the mean of the seven items. The first 6 questions of the ACQ-7 were completed by the participant while the last question (question 7) was completed by the study investigator using data from the Master Scope spirometer. The proportion of participants who achieved an improvement of at least 0.5 in ACQ-7 (i.e. decrease of ACQ-7 score of at least 0.5 from baseline) at post-baseline visits were analyzed.
Weeks 26 and 52
Change From Baseline of Rescue Medication Use During 52 Weeks Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 52
Based on the electronic-diary data, the total number of puffs of rescue medication per day over the 52 weeks were calculated and divided by the total number of days to derive the mean daily number of puffs of rescue medication taken for the participant.
Baseline up to Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 25, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 19, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 12, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 21, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 27, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CQVM149B1305

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on QMF149

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings