Retroperitoneal Ligation of Uterine Artery in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Enlarged Uterus

April 1, 2019 updated by: Taejong Song, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital

Retroperitoneal Ligation of Uterine Artery in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Enlarged Uterus: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized trial is aimed to investigate the role of retroperitoneal TLH in enlarge uterus.

Study Overview

Status

Suspended

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Laparoscopic hysterectomy is one of the most common gynecologic surgeries worldwide. Generally, in total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), uterine arteries are coagulated or transected close to the uterus, alongside the cervix, like surgical technique of a conventional total abdominal hysterectomy. Recently, several studies showed that ligation of uterine artery where it originates from the internal iliac artery during TLH (so-called "retroperitoneal TLH") is effective for reducing blood loss. However, the application of this technique to clinical practice have not been well investigated in terms of its efficacy and safety. Moreover, most of the previous studies on retroperitoneal TLH were small case series or retrospective comparative studies with conventional TLH. Therefore, the investigators conducted this randomized trial to investigate the role of retroperitoneal TLH in enlarge uterus.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • absence of pregnancy at the time of presentation
  • uterine volume between 12 and 18 weeks of gestation by pelvic examination
  • appropriate medical status for laparoscopic surgery (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification 1 or 2)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any suggestion of malignant uterine or adnexal diseases
  • any major medical comorbidities or psychiatric illnesses, which could affect follow-up and/or compliance
  • an inability to understand and provide written informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Retroperitoneal hysterectomy
In subjects allocated to the experimental group, which the uterine vessels were ligated where it originates from the internal iliac artery,
the site of ligation of uterine artery is the area that it originates from the internal iliac artery during TLH
Active Comparator: Classical hysterectomy
The operative technique of classical total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) performed in the control group was comparable to that of retroperitoneal TLH, except for one that coagulation and transection of uterine artery was achieved using an energy device alongside the cervix
the site of ligation of uterine artery is the area alongside the cervix

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative blood loss
Time Frame: Operation day
Operative blood loss was calculated by the anesthesiology unit as the difference between the total amount of suction and irrigation plus the difference between the total gauze weight before and after surgery.
Operation day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Taejong Song, MD PhD, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017-02-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hysterectomy

Clinical Trials on Retroperitoneal liagation of uterine artery

Search Similar Trials