2D and 3D Ultrasound Assessment of Cesarean Section Scars

April 13, 2017 updated by: Ahmed Maged, Cairo University

2D and 3D Ultrasound Assessment of Cesarean Section Scars and Its Correlation to Intraoperative Findings

Prospective observational study conducted on women with previous 1 or 2 CS candidate for elective CS. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment using 2D and 3D transabdominal and transvaginal then correlated to scar integrity assessed intraoperatively

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Transabdominal ultrasound examination to obtain full obstetric ultrasound report including estimated gestational age, fetal lie, presentation, amniotic fluid volume, placental location with special focus on relation to the uterine scar.

The second step was to measure the thickness of the LUS using 2D ultrasound. View of the LUS was obtained in the mid-sagittal plane and the view was magnified looking for the thinnest area of the LUS. Also, the LUS was examined in a lateral view to detect any apparent rupture, ballooning or funneling. The measurement was taken with the cursors at the urine-Urinary bladder interface and the amniotic fluid -decidua interface after sufficient magnification and measurement was taken to the nearest tenth of millimeter. The numeric display was covered during the examination to avoid bias when performing the 3D measurement in the next step. Three measurements were taken and the least measurement was recorded.

After the entire thickness was measured by 2D ultrasound, 3 D measurement were taken in the mid-saggittal plan using the multiplanar display mode and then moving through the acquired 3-D volume in the saggittal plane till the thinnest area was seen and then measurements were taken.3-D volume dataset was obtained of the LUS by the same operator. The acquired volume was manipulated on the multiplanar display mode, searching for the thinnest part of the LUS avoiding obliquity.

Transvaginal ultrasound examination was done following the transabdominal one. The vaginal probe was inserted into the posterior vaginal fornix with the patient lying supine and the patient's knees are gently flexed and hips are slightly elevated with a pillow. Clear view of the LUS was obtained in the midsagittal plane visualizing the cervical canal to ensure that the view is midline one and avoiding obliquity.

On transvaginal examination the muscular layer of the LUS was clearly seen as hypoechoic line between the hyperechoic uterovesical fold and the decidualized endometrium and the chorioamniotic membranes. The scar area was magnified so the scar occupies at least 75% of the image to ensure consistent and accurate measurements. The thickness of the muscular layer of LUS was taken with the measuring caliber placed at the urinary bladder wall-myometrium interface and the myometrial/ chorioamniotic membrane interface .Three measurements of the LUS were taken, and again, the least measurement was recorded.

Again, 3D volume data set of the LUS was obtained .The acquired volume was manipulated on the multiplanar display looking for the thinnest part of the muscular layer. The thickness was measured to the nearest tenth of millimeter and recorded. The same operator has performed the transabdominal and transvaginal sonographic examination, and the surgeon performing the CS was always blinded of the sonographic findings.

The ultrasound examination to CS time interval varied from one to forty eight hours. During Cesarean delivery the LUS was defined as the part of the uterus below the uterovesical peritoneal reflection. After opening the visceral peritoneum and performing the bladder dissection, the LUS was assessed for integrity of the CS scar by the operating surgeon to avoid bias by the sonographic findings. Scar dehiscence was defined as the presence of either transparent LUS with visible contents, presence of well-circumscribed scar defect or presence of frank uterine rupture.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt, 12151
        • Kasr Alainy Medical School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 44 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

women with prior 1 or 2 cesarean sections candidate for elective cesarean sewction

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 37 - 40 weeks of gestational age
  • singleton pregnancy,
  • cephalic presentation,
  • not in labor
  • intact membranes
  • with history of one or two previous CS

Exclusion Criteria:

  • disorders of amniotic fluid,
  • placenta previa
  • history of other uterine surgery, e.g, myomectomy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
dehiscencd scar
women who are discovered with scar dehiscence during cesarean section
Procedure: Cesarean section
During Cesarean delivery the lower uterine segment (LUS) was defined as the part of the uterus below the uterovesical peritoneal reflection. After opening the visceral peritoneum and performing the bladder dissection, the LUS was assessed for integrity of the CS scar by the operating surgeon to avoid bias by the sonographic findings. Scar dehiscence was defined as the presence of either transparent LUS with visible contents, presence of well-circumscribed scar defect or presence of frank uterine rupture.
Intact scar
women with intact scar detected during cesarean section
Procedure: Cesarean section
During Cesarean delivery the lower uterine segment (LUS) was defined as the part of the uterus below the uterovesical peritoneal reflection. After opening the visceral peritoneum and performing the bladder dissection, the LUS was assessed for integrity of the CS scar by the operating surgeon to avoid bias by the sonographic findings. Scar dehiscence was defined as the presence of either transparent LUS with visible contents, presence of well-circumscribed scar defect or presence of frank uterine rupture.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Scar dehiscence
Time Frame: At time of surgery
as the presence of either transparent LUS with visible contents, presence of well-circumscribed scar defect or presence of frank uterine rupture.
At time of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 13, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 165

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Wound Disruption

Clinical Trials on Cesarean section

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings