Effectiveness, Safety and Clinical Outcomes of Paritaprevir/Ombitasvir/r+Dasabuvir 8 Weeks (3D8)

May 18, 2018 updated by: Hepa C

Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Practice of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/ Ritonavir and Dasabuvir Administered for 8 Weeks (3D8) in Treatment-naïve Genotype 1b Hepatitis C Virus Infected Patients: Analysis of Data From Hepa-C Registry.

The aim of the study is to evaluate in clinical practice the efficacy and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ ritonavir and dasabuvir administered for 8 weeks in treatment-naïve participants with genotype 1b hepatitis C virus (HCV).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

HCV chronic infection affects 200 million people worldwide. HCV antiviral treatment has evolved rapidly since 2011. The introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) achieve great effectiveness with minimum SAEs and short treatment duration. However, studies evaluating efficacy and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ ritonavir and dasabuvir during 8 weeks are limited in real clinical practice. The aim of the study is to evaluate in clinical practice the efficacy and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ ritonavir and dasabuvir administered for 8 weeks in treatment-naïve participants with genotype 1b hepatitis C virus (HCV).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08003
        • Carrion, Jose Antonio, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with HCV who are treated in real practice with Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir+Dasabuvir

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic hepatitis C (anti-HCV antibodies and detectable HCV-RNA).
  • Genotype 1b infection
  • Treatment-naïve and non-cirrhotic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HCV genotype or subtype other than GT1b.
  • Any current or past clinical evidence of cirrhosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Spanish cohort with HCV treated with DAA
Spanish cohort with HCV treated in real practice with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir 8 weeks and dasabuvir 8 weeks
Drug: ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir 8 weeks
Spanish cohort with HCV treated in real practice with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ ritonavir 8 weeks
Other Names:
  • viekirax
Drug: dasabuvir 8 weeks
Spanish cohort with HCV treated in real practice with dasabuvir 8 weeks
Other Names:
  • exviera

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sustained virological response 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after the last dose of study drug

Percentage of participants who achieve sustained virological response 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12)

• Measure: Hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV-RNA) levels less than the lower limit of quantification.
12 weeks after the last dose of study drug

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients with virologic failure during treatment
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks after last dose of study drug

Percentage of patients with virologic failure during treatment

• Measure: Percentage of patients with confirmed >=1 log10 IU/mL increase from nadir in HCV RNA at any time point during treatment
Up to 12 weeks after last dose of study drug
Mild fibrosis and sustained virological response 12 weeks post-treatment
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks after last dose of study drug

Percentage of patients with mild fibrosis who achieve sustained virological response 12 (SVR12) weeks post-treatment

• Measure: percentage of patients with a baseline transient elastography < 6 kPa
Up to 12 weeks after last dose of study drug
Percentage of participants with low baseline viral load and SVR12 weeks post-treatment
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after the last dose of drug

Percentage of participants with low baseline viral load who achieve sustained virological response 12 (SVR12) weeks post-treatment

• Measure: HCV RNA levels less than the lower limit of quantification.
Baseline and 12 weeks after the last dose of drug

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hepa C

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 21, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 18, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0002

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis C Infection

Clinical Trials on ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir 8 weeks

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings