Comparison of Clinical Performance and Subjective Preference of Three Contact Lenses

December 10, 2019 updated by: CooperVision, Inc.

Comparison of Clinical Performance and Subjective Preference Out of Three Cosmetic Contact Lenses (Limbal Ring-enhancing Lenses, LRE Lenses)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance and subject's preference out of three LRE (Limbal Ring Enhancing) lens types: etafilcon A (Johnson&Johnson), methafilcon A (Interozzo), and methafilcon A (CooperVision).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This will be a subject-masked, bilateral, randomized, crossover dispensing study to compare clinical performance and subjective preference out of three lens types. Sixty subjects will be assigned into three groups and each group will wear the test and control lenses as matched pairs for one week in random order. Lenses will be worn on a daily wear, daily disposable schedule.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of
        • School of Optometry & Vision Science, Catholic University of Daegu, Korea (Rep)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age of 18 years and above and has full legal capacity as a volunteer Understand the rights as a research subject and willing and able sign a statement of informed consent
  • Existing soft contact lens wearers or previous experience of contact lens wear
  • Being able to wear the study lenses for at least eight hours a day
  • At least 6/9 visual acuity in each eye with the study lenses
  • Astigmatism less than 1.50 D (Diopter) in both eyes
  • Agreed to follow the protocol and not to participate in other clinical research for the duration of this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have an ocular disorder which would normally contraindicate contact lens wear
  • Have a systemic disorder or any infectious diseases which would normally contraindicate contact lens wear
  • Have previously had any ocular surgery such as corneal refractive surgery
  • Have less than 6/9 visual acuity in each eye with the study lenses
  • Are currently using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment
  • Have any corneal distortion resulting from previous rigid lens wear or have keratoconus
  • Are currently pregnant or lactating
  • No previous contact lens wear

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: etafilcon A
contact lens
Active Comparator: methafilcon A - Interozzo
contact lens
Active Comparator: methafilcon A - CVI
contact lens

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comfort
Time Frame: 1 week per intervention
Subjective ratings of comfort for each lens pair was assessed. Scale 0-100, 0=causes pain, 100=very comfortable.
1 week per intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 23, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 24, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 24, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CV_BSCHU

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myopia

Clinical Trials on etafilcon A

Search Similar Trials