Ventricular Assist Device Anti-Factor Xa (VAD ANTIX) Monitoring Study: a Prospective Randomized Feasibility Trial (VAD-ANTIX)

February 17, 2020 updated by: Thomas Graetz, Washington University School of Medicine
This study evaluates two different methods for monitoring a patient's anti-clotting [heparin] therapy after they receive a heart pump implant [left ventricular assist device -LVAD]. One method tests for how long it takes the patient's blood to clot and uses that to determine if they are on the right dose of heparin. The other method uses a more direct measure of how much heparin is in the blood. The hypothesis is that the method that more directly measures how much heparin is in the patient's blood will provide better medical results for the patient's care after they have the heart pump implant. To that end, the investigators are conducting this feasibility trial to establish the logistics associated with the implementation of these heparin monitoring approaches.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Heart failure is a medical condition that is on the rise in the US and is associated with an enormous cost of $30 billion in healthcare expenses. People with heart failure may be treated with an LVAD that is connected to their heart and helps it pump the blood from the left side of the heart into the blood vessels that delivers blood to the body. These devices can be used to treat heart failure for the long term or they can be used while a patient waits for a heart transplant. In either case, the use of these devices is increasing.

One of the primary risks associated with LVADs are those related to blood clotting. Maintenance of the LVAD depends on preventing blood clots especially right after the surgery that puts them in place. This requires putting patients with LVADs on blood thinners and then monitoring the blood thinner levels carefully so that they don't have problems with bleeding too easily or, on the other hand, forming blood clots if they aren't on the right dose of blood thinners. Excessive bleeding - called hemorrhaging - is the more common problem after surgery and half of all patients that receive an LVAD will require a blood transfusion within the first 30 days after they receive the device. A laboratory test that measures how quickly blood clots is used to determine if the patient has the right amount of blood thinners. The current standard test is called "activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT]." There are problems with the reliability of this test because it reacts with other elements in the blood. Alternately, there is a test that more directly measures the amount of heparin blood thinner rather than coagulation time and may be more reliable than aPTT called anti-factor Xa [anti-Xa].

The investigators have developed process diagrams that show steps for making decisions [called nomograms] that tell a nurse or doctor how to manage the heparin levels using test results from the aPTT test or the anti-Xa test; however, both tests will be performed at each decision time point, but the care team will only be told the results from the testing to which their patient is assigned.

The purpose of this feasibility study is to establish feasibility of using the two nomograms to determine which provides the optimal clinical information for improving patients' outcomes that have had LVADs placed.

Potential subjects will be recruited prior to their surgery and may decline to participate anytime before or after the surgery takes place. Subjects will be randomized to the aPTT nomogram or the anti-Xa nomogram. If they withdraw consent, they will receive the aPTT standard of care monitoring. The study procedures are performed by the clinical care team. Clinicians will be trained to use the nomograms.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18 years of age and older
  2. Implantation with HeartMate II® or HeartWare®, LVAD at Barnes Jewish Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to receive heparin-based therapy
  2. Hypercoagulable disorders [factor V Leiden, Antithrombin deficiency, Protein C deficiency, Antiphospholipid antibodies or other thrombophilia]
  3. Incarceration
  4. Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: aPTT nomogram
aPTT guided heparin management
Device: aPTT guided heparin management
post-surgical implantation anti-coagulation therapy to prevent clotting in ventricular assist device.
Device: Anti-factor Xa guided heparin management
post-surgical implantation anti-coagulation therapy to prevent clotting in ventricular assist device
EXPERIMENTAL: Anti-factor Xa nomogram
Anti-factor Xa guided heparin management
Device: aPTT guided heparin management
post-surgical implantation anti-coagulation therapy to prevent clotting in ventricular assist device.
Device: Anti-factor Xa guided heparin management
post-surgical implantation anti-coagulation therapy to prevent clotting in ventricular assist device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nomogram Feasibility
Time Frame: 14 days of heparin therapy
Questionnaires evaluating pragmatic application of nomograms. Question 1: The current heparin nomogram using (aPTT or anti-Xa depending on group) monitoring is easy to follow.
14 days of heparin therapy
Nomogram Feasibility
Time Frame: 14 days of heparin therapy
Questionnaires evaluating pragmatic application of nomograms. Question 2: Overall, I am satisfied with the utilization and implementation of the heparin monitoring nomogram.
14 days of heparin therapy
Nomogram Feasibility
Time Frame: 14 days of heparin therapy
Questionnaires evaluating pragmatic application of nomograms. Question 3: Overall, I feel that this dosing nomogram is feasible.
14 days of heparin therapy
Nomogram Feasibility
Time Frame: 14 days of heparin therapy
Questionnaires evaluating pragmatic application of nomograms. Question 4: When my patient is on the heparin nomogram, I follow the dosing and monitoring instructions exactly.
14 days of heparin therapy
Nomogram Feasibility
Time Frame: 14 days of heparin therapy
Questionnaires evaluating pragmatic application of nomograms. Question 5: I often had to seek clarification from a coworker, pharmacist, NP, or MD regarding the nomogram instructions.
14 days of heparin therapy
Success of Nomogram
Time Frame: 14 days of heparin therapy
Amount of time sustained in therapeutic anticoagulation range
14 days of heparin therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nomogram Concordance
Time Frame: 14 days of heparin therapy
Compare heparin dosing success between aPTT and anti-factor Xa nomograms. If aPTT was within therapeutic range of nomogram AND anti-factor Xa was within range in therapeutic nomogram, then paired values were deemed "concordent". Similiarly if both aPTT AND anti-factor Xa were above therapeutic range OR both below therapeutic range, then paired valued were deemed "concordent". Otherwise values deemd "discordant"
14 days of heparin therapy
Dosing Changes
Time Frame: 14 days of heparin therapy
Number of dosing changes during heparin therapy until first therapeutic
14 days of heparin therapy
Time to Therapeutic Dose
Time Frame: 14 days of heparin therapy
Amount of time needed to achieve therapeutic dose from heparin initiation
14 days of heparin therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Washington University School of Medicine

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Thomas J Graetz, MD, Dept of Anesthesiology, Washington University STL SOM

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 20, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 12, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 12, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 3, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 17, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 201701126

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heparin

Clinical Trials on aPTT guided heparin management

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings