The Effect of Laser Treatment on Macular Pigment of Eye in Cases With Diabetes

May 10, 2017 updated by: Afyon Kocatepe University Hospital

The Effect of Laser Pan-retinal Photocoagulation on Macular Pigment Optical Density in Cases With Diabetic Retinopathy

It has been hypothesized that thermal damage of laser pan-retinal photocoagulation may affect macular pigment as well as inner layer cells in the retina, so it was aimed to investigate possible effect of conventional laser pan-retinal photocoagulation on macular pigment optical density in diabetic retinopathy patients without macular edema and pathology in this study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The local authorized clinical trials ethics committee approved the study and this study was performed following the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (2008). Detailed information was given to patients about clinical applications and tests, and signed informed consent forms were also obtained from all patients. The 36 eyes of 36 patients, scheduled for laser pan-retinal photocoagulation treatment, with newly diagnosed proliferative diabetic retinopathy without macular edema or scarring between October 2015 - June 2016 were included in this sequential self-controlled clinical trial. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy was diagnosed with determination of neovascular proliferations is either on the disc (NVD) or elsewhere (NVE) except macular area in fundus examination with 90-diopter lens and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) (Heidelberg Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering, Baden-Württemberg, Germany). Patients, detected macular fluid or edema by optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Cirrus HD 4000, Carl Zeis Meditec, CA, USA) in study eye, were excluded in the study. After providing information to patients about the disease and treatment; patients, predicted to show adherence to treatment, were enrolled in the study.

Ophthalmological examinations were performed in all cases. Firstly, visual acuity was recorded, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessed using Snellen's chart and was converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for statistical analysis. After maximal pupil dilatation was achieved using 1% tropicamide and 10% phenylephrine eye drops, put once or twice, at ten minute intervals, slit-lamp examination was performed, and fundus was examined with 90-diopter indirect non-contact fundus lens, and ocular finds were recorded.

Prior to measurements the pupil was dilated to at least 7 mm diameter using a topical mydriatic agent. Macular pigment optical density (MPOD) levels were measured in the study eye using luminance differential thresholds test (MonPack System®, Metrovision, Perenchies, France), color perimetry technique at baseline before first PRP laser treatment and every month before laser treatment until the end of this study. The macular pigment absorbs blue light, and luminance differential thresholds test evaluates the density of the macular pigment by comparing the thresholds of perception of blue light and red light with a staircase technique similar to the technique used in automated perimetry. Luminance differential thresholds were measured for 2 stimuli: a blue stimulus (450-480 nm) absorbed by the MP, and a red one (615 nm) not absorbed. The stimuli were presented at the fovea and at 6 peripheral locations with an eccentricity of 3 to 10 degrees (0°, 0.8°, 1.8°, 2.8° and 3.8°, and the average of two measurements at 6.8° and 7.8° retinal eccentricity serves as the peripheral reference point). Tests parameters were Goldmann size III over a white background of 10 cd.m-2. The average values of the tested (decibel=dB) were converted to logarithm units (log unit) for statistical analysis (dB = 10log10 (Reference1/Reference2)). Because, decibel is always the comparison between two values. As a result, the decibel number is the same, although the measured power value is often different. Therefore, arithmetic operations with the numbers expressed in decibels would be inconvenient.

Conventional laser PRP treatments were performed under topical anesthesia by using green laser photocoagulator (GYC-500 Vixi® Nidek, Gamagori, Japan) and Volk® quadraspheric lens. PRP laser were applied in 300mW power, 200-400-500 μm spot size and 0.1-0.2 second pulse options, based upon preferences and comfort levels. When a pattern array was used, the spot separation was set at 0.5 times the burn width.

Laser parameters were evaluated based on a) area (A) (= πr2 × number of shots) r being the spot radius, which is half of the spot size (100-200-250 μm), and it was converted to square millimeters (mm2) for statistical analyses, b) treatment duration (t) (= 0.1 - 0.2 second × number of shots) and c) total energy (E) (= P × t) milijoules (mJ) P being the power, which is 300mW.

All examinations, MPOD and laser PRP parameters were repeated and recorded at 1st, 2nd, 3rd month before laser treatments and 6th month. Changes in the eating habits of patients were questioned at all study visits. All subjects were told to continue their normal diet, as no subjects were consuming supplements containing lutein or zeaxanthin.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
36

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) logMAR ≤0.4
  • Newly diagnosis of PDR and initiation of conventional laser PRP treatment
  • Between the ages of 40 and 65 years (40≤age≤65)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Corneal scarring, cataract or intravitreal hemorrhage that prevents appearance of the fundus
  • Presence of macular pathologies such as AMD or choroidopathy
  • Presence of macular edema or NVE in the macular area
  • Detection of macular fluid or edema in OCT or FFA
  • Previous laser PRP treatments
  • Focal and / or grid photocoagulation requirements
  • Previous refractive or vitreoretinal surgery
  • Spherical refractive error ≥ ±6.00 D or cylinder refractive error ≥ ±3.00 D
  • Systemic diseases that may affect the choroidal blood flow such as cardiological diseases
  • Current use of carotenoid supplementation
  • Changing eating habits
  • Gastrointestinal diseases that could cause disturbance of dietary absorption

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Laser pan-retinal photocoagulation
Conventional laser pan-retinal photocoagulations were performed by using green laser photocoagulator, every month for 3 months
Device: Laser pan-retinal photocoagulation
Green laser photocoagulator
Other Names:
  • GYC-500 Vixi

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change macular pigment optical density from baseline at 6 months
Time Frame: 1 month and 3 months
Macular pigment optical density measures were repeated and recorded at 1st, 2nd, 3rd month before laser treatments and 6th month
1 month and 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation analysis between macular pigment optical density and panretinal laser photocoagulation parameters during 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months
The correlations between macular pigment optical density outcomes and panretinal laser photocoagulation parameters (total energy, total area, total shots, total duration) were evaluated for 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Afyon Kocatepe University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Mustafa Dogan, Asst. Prof., Afyon Kocatepe University Eye Clinics

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 8, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 12, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 12, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 10, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2011-KAEK-2 2015/323

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Retinal Degeneration

Clinical Trials on Laser pan-retinal photocoagulation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings