Using Less Neurotoxic Drugs in Patients With HAND (MARAND-X) ((MARAND-X))

November 5, 2020 updated by: Giovanni Di Perri

MARaviroc-based Treatment Switch in HIV-positive Patients With HAND: Consequences of Reducing Antiretroviral-associated Neurotoxicity

Neurocognitive disorders are still highly prevalent in the HAART era; despite a dramatic reduction in dementia cases, 15-50% of patients may develop mild or asymptomatic neurocognitive disorders (HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders, HAND).

Among other hypothesis neurotoxicity of antiretrovirals has been postulated but its impact is unknown.

Our hypothesis is that using drugs with reduced in vitro neurotoxicity may improve cognition in HIV-positive patients withHAND.

76 patients with HAND will be randomized to either continue their treatment or switch to emtricitabine, darunavir/cobicistat, maraviroc. Patients will be re-tested 6 months later.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Scientific Rationale for Study / Scientific Study Objectives:

Neurocognitive disorders are still highly prevalent in the HAART era; despite a dramatic reduction in dementia cases, 15-50% of patients may develop mild or asymptomatic neurocognitive disorders (HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders, HAND). It should be highlighted that patients presenting no abnormalities in everyday living activities (asymptomatic neurocognitive disorders, ANI) are at higher risk of worse results in performance-based tests, adherence-based measures and they show a significant risk of progressing to more severe forms of impairment. Excluding significantly confounding comorbidities, several factors have been associated with this neurocognitive decline including a low nadir CD4+ T-lymphocyte count, a high HIV DNA, a lower compartmental viral control, a lower concentration/penetration effectiveness score, a lower efficacy in macrophage-derived cells and antiretroviral-generated neuronal toxicity. However several data point out that vascular abnormalities, very common in HIV-positive patients, may deeply influence neurocognitive disorders development and severity: of note, intima media thickness, a well recognized proxy of systemic atherosclerosis, was associated with HAND.

In case of HAND diagnosis, the only recommended approach is to optimize treatment according to plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) resistance tests; no strategy is currently suggested in case of suppressed plasma and CSF HIV RNA or in case of low level CSF HIV RNA (without evidence of genotypic resistance). It has been postulated that antiretrovirals may have neurotoxic effects through different mechanisms and such effects might become evident once the beneficial effect of HIV RNA suppression vanishes. Available data suggest that, in vitro, the drugs associated with the least neurotoxic effect were emtricitabine, tenofovir, darunavir and maraviroc. Furthermore, several pieces of evidence and a small randomized trial suggest that maraviroc, in HAART-treated subjects may have beneficial effects in terms of improved neurocognitive function, reduced CSF inflammatory biomarkers and improved MRI markers of neuronal integrity.

No study has so far investigated the effect of using drugs with a low neurotoxic profile in HAART-treated patients with HAND.

Primary objective of the study is the variation in neurocognitive tests (global deficit score), 6 months after treatment switch while secondary objectives include the improvement in other biomarkers of neuronal and vascular integrity.

Methods:

Study Design: Randomized, controlled, pilot study. HIV-positive patients that fulfill the inclusion criteria and that sign the informed consent will be enrolled. Patients will be randomized 1:1 (block randomization) to either continue their treatment or to switch to once-daily emtricitabine (200 mg) plus darunavir/cobicistat (800/150 mg) plus maraviroc (300 mg). A lumbar puncture will be performed 6 months after treatment switch.

Number of Patients: 76 (38 per arm)

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
38

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Torino, Italy
        • University of Torino

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age above >18 years;
  • Confirmed HIV-positivity;
  • Diagnosed with HAND according to the Frascati Criteria;
  • On combination antiretroviral treatment;
  • No evidence of major resistance associated mutations on previous plasma or CSF samples;
  • Plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/mL;
  • CSF HIV RNA <50 copies/mL;
  • R5-tropic virus as detected by a genotype or phenotype based test before starting HAART or genotype-based test performed on HIV DNA in the previous 12 months;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the use of drugs having major drug-to-drug interaction with maraviroc (for instance rifampicin);
  • the use of efavirenz- or darunavir-containing regimens at baseline;
  • confounding comorbidities that may influence or affect the diagnosis of HAND including developmental disability, history of traumatic brain injury or of cerebrovascular accident;
  • a previous diagnosis of central nervous system opportunistic, autoimmune, neurodegenerative or neoplastic disease;
  • severe untreated depression;
  • active alcohol or recreational substance abuse (in the previous 3 months);
  • not fluent in Italian or unable to complete the neurocognitive tests.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Standard of care
Continue current antiretroviral regimen
Experimental: Reduced Neurotoxicity Arm
Emtricitabine plus darunavir/cobicistat plus maraviroc
Drug: emtricitabine, darunavir/cobicistat, maraviroc
Treatment change

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6-month variation in global deficit score in NPZ-8 complete neurocognitive tests according to the study arm;
Time Frame: 6 months
Global deficit score
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
rs-fMRI
Time Frame: 6 months
spectroscopic and perfusion markers at MRI as well as the variations in brain connectivity at resting state functional MRI;
6 months
EEG-LORETA
Time Frame: 6 months
electroencephalographic waves using the LORETA software;
6 months
CSF HIV RNA
Time Frame: 6 months
changes in CSF HIV RNA in the two arms
6 months
CSF markers
Time Frame: 6 months
Variation in CSF markers of inflammation or neuronal damage
6 months
Blood Brain Barrier Integrity
Time Frame: 6 months
Variation in CSAR in the two arms
6 months
IMT
Time Frame: 6 months
Variation in carotid intima media thickness in the two arms
6 months
TMAO
Time Frame: 6 months
Variation in trimethylamine-N-oxide in the two arms
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Giovanni Di Perri

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 22, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 5, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MARAND-X

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hiv

Clinical Trials on emtricitabine, darunavir/cobicistat, maraviroc

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings