Urban Zen Integrative Therapy for Persons With Pulmonary Hypertension

April 9, 2024 updated by: Ohio State University

Feasibility and Acceptability of an Integrative Therapy for Symptom Management in Persons With Pulmonary Hypertension

The primary goal of this study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a 6-week multicomponent integrative therapy program, Urban Zen Integrative Therapy (UZIT), for adults with chronic, life-limiting cardiopulmonary disease. The secondary goal is to determine preliminary efficacy of UZIT in symptom management. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) presents an excellent model of a severe, life-limiting cardiopulmonary condition with high symptom burden and poor outcomes suitable for this scientific inquiry. Despite medical and pharmacological advances in the treatment, 50-55% of persons with PH will die within three years after diagnosis. Medical management often involves life-long complex pharmacological treatment requiring high levels of skill, knowledge, and social support. Clusters of bothersome symptoms such as chest pain, anxiety, insomnia, dyspnea, and fatigue can overwhelm patients' ability to manage daily activities and medication treatment regimens. Side effects of treatment induce additional noxious symptoms. The high prevalence of physical symptoms, depression, and anxiety among adults with PH confirmed in our prior work, can also lead to reduced (HRQoL). A literature search found no published report of complementary, integrative therapy interventions to alleviate symptoms in adults with PH. This study will use a single group repeated-measures design to address the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and to explore preliminary efficacy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This feasibility and acceptability study will use a pre/post intervention (6-weeks UZIT program) mixed-method design with repeated (weekly) measures of a single cohort of 20 patients with PH. This study will also explore preliminary efficacy testing to construct sample size estimates for future randomized control trials. Patients will serve as their controls.

This study will enroll 20 patients from two PH clinics within the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC). Patients with PH condition related to the cardiac cause are managed at the OSU Cardiology clinic located at the Ross Heart Hospital. Patients with PH condition related to other causes are managed at the OSU Pulmonary clinic at Martha Morehouse. These inter-professional clinics provide access to a patient population with diverse race/ ethnicity, sex, and age. All eligible patients managed at both PH clinics at OSUWMC will be invited to participate. Patients in both clinics receive standard medical treatments according to institutional and national clinical practice guidelines.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
14

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • The Ohio State University Ross Heart Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria are:

  1. confirmed diagnosis of PH in the past 1 year,
  2. age > 18 years, (children typically have different etiologies, and often require parent involvement in symptom management),
  3. ability to ambulate independently,
  4. New York Heart Association functional classification II/III, and
  5. willingness to participate in the entire 6-8 weeks study.

Exclusion criteria are

  1. known allergies to essential oils (lavender, lemon, or peppermint),
  2. Asthma condition,
  3. psychiatric illness requiring hospitalization within the last year per self-report or medical record,
  4. self-reported pregnancy,
  5. on-going participation in mind-body integrative therapy, and
  6. inability to read/write English (to complete questionnaires).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: UZIT arm
Multi-modal components integrative therapy intervention program, Urban Zen Integrative Therapy.
Behavioral: Urban Zen Integrative Therapy (UZIT)
Multi-modal components integrative therapy program (UZIT) that includes essential oil, gentle body movement, body-awareness meditation, and Reiki.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Symptom Scale - SOB With Exertion
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-week post-intervention
Symptoms assessment and Health-related quality of life assessment. We focused on the shortness of breath. The minimum and maximum scores are 0 and 10, respectively. A higher score indicates the worst outcome.Measured at baseline and 6-weeks post-intervention for comparision
Baseline and 6-week post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review.
Time Frame: Baseline and 6-week post-intervention

This instrument was used to measure the overall Health-related quality of life with multiple domains. We focused on the Symptom Burden domain.

The minimum and maximum scores range from "0" to "25", indicating "good" and "poor" symptom burden, respectively.

The scale of the change score indicates the level of MID (minimum importance difference). If the score is more significant than 2.0 MID, the intervention makes a minimal level of importance in their quality of life perception.

Measurements were taken at baseline and 6-weeks post-intervention for comparision.
Baseline and 6-week post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ohio State University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tania VonVisger, PhD, SUNY Buffalo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 19, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 5, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 5, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2017H0022

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Disease

Clinical Trials on Urban Zen Integrative Therapy (UZIT)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings