Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT)

December 14, 2023 updated by: Serge de Valliere, University of Lausanne Hospitals

Observational Study About the Feasibility, Safety and Efficacy of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT)

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has been recognised as a useful, cost-effective and safe alternative to inpatient treatment, but no formal OPAT unit existed in Switzerland until recently. In December 2013 an OPAT unit was established at Lausanne University Hospital. The investigators plan to investigate the efficacy, safety and economicity of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy administered at the new OPAT unit of the Lausanne University Hospital starting in January 2014 until December 2020.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Some patients require parenteral antibiotic therapy, but are well enough to return home. Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) was first developed in the USA in the 1970s for patients with cystic fibrosis, before being adopted by other countries. It has been recognised as a useful, cost-effective and safe alternative to inpatient treatment. It is now a standard care in several countries and different national guidelines have been established. There are various models of care for OPAT and most OPAT centres provide hospital-centred nursing programmes or services based on nurses visiting the patient's home. A few centres have also shown that self-administration of intravenous antibiotic therapy is an effective and safe option for selected patients. Furthermore, use of continuous infusion of antibiotics increases the number of feasible treatments. Continuous infusion by pumps of antibiotics with a time-dependent killing mechanism is a practical option which has been described. In Europe, even if many infectious disease specialists feel that OPAT is required, it is still underdeveloped because of lack of funding, lack of leadership and lack of coordination between hospitals and community care.

In the last decades, programs to enhance care delivery on an outpatient basis in order to contain health costs have been developed in Switzerland. However administration of outpatient intravenous antibiotic therapy for patients who require parenteral therapy, but are otherwise fit enough to go home, hasn't been used widely until recently. In December 2013, an outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment (OPAT) unit was initiated at Lausanne University Hospital with the goal of offering an alternative treatment programme that is equally effective and as safe as inpatient treatment.

The purpose of this study will be to investigate the efficacy, safety and economicity of treatments administered at the new OPAT unit of the University Hospital of Lausanne in the context of the Swiss Health System.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
      • Lausanne, Switzerland, 1011
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Outpatient Care and Community Medicine, University Hospital of Lausanne
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Serge de Valliere, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients referred to the OPAT unit of Lausanne Unversity Hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients referred to the OPAT unit of Lausanne University Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Refusing participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of treatment outcomes
Time Frame: 2014-2020

Efficacy of OPAT will be evaluated by recording the treatment outcome. Patients will be categorized 3 months after end of treatment as cured, as treatment failure or as a relapse according to the following definitions:

  • cured: absence of fever and no clinical sign of the site of infection.
  • treatment failure: patient readmitted to hospital because of infection related complications
  • relapse: patients considered as cured at the end of OPAT, but who had again signs of infection at the same site within 3 months after end of OPAT.
2014-2020
Evaluation of the incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: 2014-2020
Evaluation of the safety of OPAT will be done by measuring the rate of adverse events and their severity during OPAT. All adverse events will be recorded and classified according to their severity according the grade classification (grade 1 to 5) as recommended by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). (https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_5x7.pdf)
2014-2020
Economic evaluation
Time Frame: 2014-2020
The cost of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatments will be estimated and compared to similar economic evaluations of other centres published in the literature.
2014-2020

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Lausanne Hospitals

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 14, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 34/14

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infections

Clinical Trials on Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings