Safety and Efficacy of TrueTear™ for the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Disease

October 8, 2020 updated by: Allergan

Prospective, Open-Label, Randomized, Proof of Concept Study Exploring Application of TrueTear™ for the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Disease

This study will compare the safety and efficacy of TrueTear™ to standardized moist heat compress (Thermalon® Dry Eye Compress) for the treatment of Meibomian Gland Disease (MGD).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
57

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Andover, Massachusetts, United States, 01810
        • Andover Eye Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Dry eye disease or Meibomian Gland Disease as evaluated by Standard Participant Evaluation for Dryness (SPEED) score, Schirmer test, Tear film breakup time and other applicable objective measures at the Screening and Baseline Visits.
  • Use of an artificial tear product, lid hygiene, omega-3 supplementation, antibiotics for the treatment of dry eye disease or Meibomian Gland Disease within one year of the Screening Visit.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic or recurrent epistaxis, coagulation disorders or other conditions that may increase the risk of bleeding.
  • History of nasal or sinus surgery.
  • Vascularized polyp, deviated septum or severe nasal airway obstruction at the Screening visit.
  • Intraocular and extraocular surgery in either eye within three months of the Screening Visit or refractive surgery within twelve months of the Screening Visit.
  • Cardiac demand pacemaker, implanted defibrillator, or other active implanted metallic or active implanted electronic device in the head.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Thermalon
Participants received application of Thermalon dry eye compress on Days 0 and 7 followed by daily use as per label instructions.
Device: Thermalon Dry Eye Compress
Application of Thermalon Dry Eye Compress at Day 0, Day 7 and daily use as per label instructions.
EXPERIMENTAL: TrueTear™
Participants received TrueTear™ device intranasally for approximately 8 minutes on Day 0, for approximately 3 minutes on Day 7 followed by daily use of TrueTear™ per participant guide.
Device: TrueTear™
Intranasal application of TrueTear™ device for approximately 8 minutes at Day 0, for approximately 3 minutes at Day 7 and then daily use of TrueTear™ per participant guide.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) Impact Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) to Day 30
MGD impact questionnaire includes 10 questions about the impacts a participant may experience associated with MGD. Participants were asked to rate how much they have been affected by MGD symptoms in past 7 days. Question/s (Qs) 1-6 (computer usage, reading, leisure activities, social activities, driving and outdoor activities) were rated on a scale of 1=no difficulty to 5=a lot of difficulty. Q7 (frequency of outdoor activities) was rated on scale of 1=never to 5=all the time. If participants did not experience a particular impact, they chose 0=NA for Qs 1-7. Q8 (time spent to take care of eyes) was rated on scale 0-4, where 0=no time at all to 4=a lot of time, Qs 9-10 (bothered with amount of time taking care of eyes and bothered by appearance) were rated on scale 0-4, with 0=not at all bothered to 4=very bothered. Higher scores represented greater impact. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline (Day 0) to Day 30
Change From Baseline in MGD Symptoms Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) to Day 30
MGD symptom questionnaire included 11 questions about the symptoms the participant may experience associated with MGD. The participant was asked to rate how much they experienced certain MGD symptoms and the severity of the symptoms over the past 24 hours on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = not at all, 1 = a little, 2 = somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4 = very. A higher score within each question represented increased severity of the indicated symptom. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline (Day 0) to Day 30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Allergan

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Gail Torkildsen, mdlasik@comcast.net

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 26, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 12, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 12, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 20, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 8, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • OCUN-023

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye Syndromes

Clinical Trials on Thermalon Dry Eye Compress

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings