Apatinib Plus XELOX as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

June 26, 2019 updated by: Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Apatinib Plus XELOX Regime as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients With Lymph Node Metastasis

Apatinib plus XELOX regime as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer PatientsWith lymph node metastasis

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a Single-center, Open-label, Single-arm,Non-randomized exploratory clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of Apatinib plus XELOX regime as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients With lymph node metastasis

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
35

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Recruiting
        • ZhongShan Hospital FuDan University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yi-Hong Sun, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients, age ≥18 years.
  2. Karnofsky score 70%.
  3. Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of gastric cancer with Lauren classification Clinically diagnosed stage T2-T4aN+M0 according to CT/MRI scan.
  4. At least one measurable and evaluable disease based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST v1.1), that is one or more perigastric lymph note were greater than or equal to 1.5cm in diameter.
  5. Laparoscopic exploration confirms no peritoneal metastasis and negative peritoneal lavage.
  6. Physical condition and adequate organ function to ensure the success of abdominal surgery.
  7. Adequate hematological function: Neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 × 109/L, Platelets ≥ 100 × 109/L and Hemoglobin ≥8g/dL. Adequate liver function: Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN); AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) < 2.5 × ULN. ALP ≤ 2.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN); ALB ≥30g/L.Adequate renal function: Serum creatinine ≤ 1 x ULN, and serum albumin≥30g/L.
  8. Life expectancy of more than 5 years without serious concomitant diseases.
  9. Written (signed) informed consent.
  10. Able to comply with study and follow-up procedures.
  11. Consent to provide tissue sample.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or lactating women.
  2. pregnancy tests before entering the group (in serum) of the childbearing age women were positive, or no pregnancy tests.
  3. patients with distant metastases or local unresectable factors.
  4. tumor stage considered as cT1 by imaging or ultrasound gastroscopy.
  5. Patients who received prior anti-tumor therapy including cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormonal therapy and immunotherapy.
  6. History of other malignancies within the last 5 years except cured basal cell carcinoma of skin and carcinoma in situ of uterine cervix.
  7. History of significant neurological or mental disorder, including seizures or dementia, which may interfere compliance and sign of consent inform.
  8. Unstable, persistent cardiac disease despite medicinal treatment; myocardial infarction within 12 months before the start of the trial.
  9. Patients with poor-controlled arterial hypertension (systolic pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg) despite standard medical management.
  10. Ileus, chronic inflammatory intestinal disease or extensive resection of the small intestine and other disorders which limit drug absorption.
  11. Patients who experienced GI bleeding within two weeks, or with high risk of bleeding.
  12. Patients with symptomatic peripheral neuropathy NCI CTC version> 1.0 grade, except only the deficiency of Deep tendon reflex.
  13. Organ transplant patient need immunosuppression treatment.
  14. Active or uncontrolled severe infection or other severe and /or uncontrolled diseases
  15. Patients with moderate or severe chronic kidney disease estimated glomerular filtration rate≤50 ml/min or serum creatinine ≥the upper limit of normal(ULN),
  16. deficiency of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)
  17. Allergy to the drugs in this protocol
  18. Less than 4 weeks from the last clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Apatinib plus XELOX
Patients will be given the perioperative chemotherapy of Apatinib plus XELOX once recruited
Drug: Apatinib plus XELOX

three weeks is one cycle, 4 cycles followed by radical gastrectomy. Apatinib: 250 mg, p.o., qd, every 3 weeks for the first two cycles. if no level 3 or severer AEs happened, change apatinib to 500mg, p.o.,qd, otherwise keep 250mg in the third cycle. no apatinib in the fourth cycle.

Capecitabine: 1000mg/m2, p.o., bid, D1-14, every 3 weeks (treatment for 2 weeks and rest 1 week).

Oxaliplatin: 130mg/m2, i.v. over 2h, D1, every 3 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective response rate (ORR)
Time Frame: 3 months
Both CR and PR according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors RECIST Version 1.1
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3-year overall survival rate
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
3-year disease free survival rate
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Time Frame: 30 days
The safety of the the perioperative treatment, percentage of grade 3 or 4 adverse events as safety profile of perioperative treatments
30 days
Pathological response rate (pRR)
Time Frame: 30 days
Briefly, pathCR (Pathological complete rate) was defined as an absence of carcinoma cells in the primary site, and pathologic partial response (pathPR) was defined as less than 10% residual carcinoma cells in the specimen.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 22, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 22, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 25, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 26, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ZSGC-002

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trials on Apatinib plus XELOX

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings