Efficacy of HFNC Versus NIV for Prevent Reintubation in Sepsis Patients
Efficacy of High Flow Oxygen Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation After Extubation in Sepsis Patients
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Post extubation respiratory failure occur in 30% of extubated patients. More than 50% of them required reintubation. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIV) had been reported as an effective tool to prevent post extubation respiratory failure. Recently, high flow oxygen nasal cannula (HFNC) had been successfully used to prevent post extubation respiratory failure and prevent reintubation. The results from recent randomized controlled trials, comparing HFNC with NIV for prevent post extubation respiratory failure among post cardiac surgery and high risk patients, showed no significant different in the treatment outcome.comparable with NIV among post cardiothoracic surgery and high risk for reintubated patients.
About 40-85% of severe sepsis/septic shock patients developed acute respiratory failure, required endotracheal intubation. According to the nature of patients population, usually eldery, multiple co-morbid condition and high APACHE II score, sepsis patients were considerred as high risk for reintubation, after extubated. There was no information about HFNC versus NIV in prevention of reintubation among severe sepsis or septic shock patients.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock according to the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)
- Depended on mechanical ventilator for more than 48 hours
- Plan for extubation due to successful weaning
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient with tracheostomy
- Recent upper abdominal surgery
- Wound at face that prohibit face-mask application
- Patient or 1st degree relative not agree to participate trial
- Physician prefer either NIV or HFNC for the patient
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation
After extubation, patient will receive non invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIV) for prevent respiratory and reintubation
|
Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation will apply via a face mask with initial setting as the following: Inspiratory pressure 6-8 cmH2O Expiratory pressure 3-5 cmH2O FiO2 30-60% Respiratory rate 12-16 per min
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: High flow oxygen nasal cannula
After extubation, patient will receive high flow oxygen cannula for prevent respiratory and reintubation
|
High flow oxygen nasal cannula will apply to patient via a nasal cannula with initial setting as the following: Temperature 37 degree celsius Flow 30 liter per min FiO2 40-60%
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Device failure rate
Time Frame: an average of 1 year
|
Device failure to prevent reintubation, patient discomfort, change to another device within 72 hours after extubation
|
an average of 1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Reintubation rate
Time Frame: an average of 1 year
|
Patient develope respiratory failure, requiring reintubation within 72 hours after extubation
|
an average of 1 year
|
|
28 day mortality rate
Time Frame: Upto 28 days
|
Proportion of dead patients to overall patients
|
Upto 28 days
|
|
Hospital mortality rate
Time Frame: an average of 1 year
|
Proportion of dead patients to overall patients from extubation to discharge date
|
an average of 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Surat Tongyoo, Dr, Siriraj Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
- Tongyoo S, Tantibundit P, Daorattanachai K, Viarasilpa T, Permpikul C, Udompanturak S. High-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Sep 14;11(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00922-5.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Si212/2017
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Septic Shock
-
NCT02339649UnknownSevere Sepsis With Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis Without Septic Shock
-
NCT07273526RecruitingSeptic Shock | Fluid Refractory Septic Shock
-
NCT03000049Unknown
-
NCT02135770CompletedSevere Sepsis With Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis Without Septic Shock
-
NCT07388628RecruitingSepsis | Septic Shock | Immunoparalysis in Septic Shock
-
NCT03788837CompletedSeptic Shock Hyperdynamic
-
NCT03818269CompletedPatients with Septic Shock
-
NCT00525369CompletedSepsis, Septic Shock
Clinical Trials on Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation
-
NCT03238014UnknownCOPD | Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
-
NCT00537446TerminatedMotor Neuron Disease | Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
-
NCT01151501WithdrawnAcute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
-
NCT02930174Completed
-
NCT00386464CompletedAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
-
NCT06483984RecruitingRespiratory Insufficiency
-
NCT01782768CompletedChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
-
NCT00135538UnknownPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
-
NCT00343993UnknownAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | Acute Lung Injury