Benefits of Traditional and Golf-specific Resistance Training in Amateur Female Golfers

August 9, 2017 updated by: High Point University
Amateur female golfers were randomized to either a functional weight lifting group or a traditional weight lift group. Testing, consisting of performance measures and golf measures, was performed at baseline and after 10 weeks of weight lifting.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A randomized control trial to compare the effects of 10 weeks of two different types of training in recreationally active female golfers was performed. Participants were recruited through postings at local country clubs and public golf courses, as well as through emails to state and local women's golf associations. Following written informed consent approved by the university's institutional review board, participants completed a medical and golf history questionnaire. Golf-specific information gathered via the history form included self-reported number of years playing golf, handicap, frequency of play, frequency of practice. Baseline testing followed, consisting of measurement of height and weight using a stadiometer, bone density and body composition using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), 7-iron and driver club speed and total ball distance using a golf simulator (High Definition Golf, Interactive Sports Technologies, Vaughan, Ontario), and physical performance tests. Participants were then randomly assigned, using a random number generator, to either a traditional resistance training group (TRAD) or a golf-specific resistance training group (GSRT). Resistance training was conducted 3 days per week for 10 weeks. Each training session was directly supervised by at least one of the researchers, such that correct technique and appropriate resistance could be monitored. Following the 10 weeks of training, participants repeated the testing procedures under similar conditions as baseline testing.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • High Point, North Carolina, United States, 27262
        • Human Biomechanics and Physiology Study

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • females ≥18 years of age,
  • and an official handicap or completion of at least 5 rounds of golf within the last year

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria were current episode of musculoskeletal pain,
  • unable to stand and swing a golf club independently,
  • systemic disease including but not limited to rheumatologic disease or cancer,
  • or psychological or other cognitive impairment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Traditional strengthening
These subjects performed traditional strengthening exercises of targeted muscle groups (For example, bench press, lat pulldowns, dead lifts and wrist curls)
dead lifts, bench press, wrist curls, and lat pulldowns as examples
Active Comparator: Functional Strengthening
These subjects performed exercises that either mimicked golf (diagonal chop) or that required balance and stability (single leg dead lift)
diagonal chops, one leg deadlifts, lateral plyometrics as examples

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Driver club speed
Time Frame: 10 weeks
Driver club speed- continuous variable measured in mph
10 weeks
7-iron club speed
Time Frame: 10 weeks
7-iron club speed-continuous variable measured in mph
10 weeks
Driver distance
Time Frame: 10 weeks
Driver distance-continuous variable measured in yards
10 weeks
7-iron distance
Time Frame: 10 weeks
7-iron -continuous variable measured in yards
10 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Seated rotation flexibility
Time Frame: 10 weeks
sit and rotate left and right- continuous variable measured with a goniometer in degrees
10 weeks
Weighted ball golf toss
Time Frame: 10 weeks
Using a golf-like motion, toss a 6lb ball as far as possible- continuous scale measured in cm
10 weeks
Weighted ball seated toss
Time Frame: 10 weeks
sitting in a declined position, use a chest pass motion to toss a 6 lb ball as far as possible- continuous measure measured in cm
10 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bone density
Time Frame: 10 weeks
bone density- continuous measure measured using a dual image x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan
10 weeks
Body fat percentage
Time Frame: 10 weeks
body fat percentage- 0-100% scale measured using a DEXA scan
10 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HPU#201310-227

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Traditional strengthening

Search Similar Trials