Evaluation of Pain in Urinary Collections in Pediatric Emergencies in Children Who Have Not Acquired Cleanliness (SONDAPU)
Round-trip Survey or Urine Bag: Evaluation of Pain in Urinary Collections in Pediatric Emergencies in Children Who Have Not Acquired Cleanliness (SONDAPU)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Detailed Description
Febrile urinary infections account for 5% of unexplained causes of fever in children up to 2 years of age. Urinary samples are therefore very common in pediatric emergencies. In children who have not acquired cleanliness, the most used method of collection is the placement of a sterile urine bag on the perineum. It allows a noninvasive urinary collection. However from a bacteriological point of view this method is debatable because the rate of contamination of the collections is important. This mode of collection is of interest only to exclude a urinary infection, by the realization of a urinary strip.
Pocket-collected urine is not reliable for bacteriological analysis in culture. For example, if the urine strip is positive, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends urine sampling by urine sampling (or other invasive methods) for culture.
The urine bag should be changed every 30 minutes to avoid the risk of contamination. The technique is wait-and-see, the installation of several pockets is often necessary before obtaining urine.
A study carried out in 2014 shows that in 39.4% of the cases the withdrawal of the urinary pouch was as much more painful than the urinary sounding, in the same patient. To our knowledge there is no other study dealing with the difference in pain engendered by these two methods.
Since the urinary catheterization is faster, bacteriologically justified and necessary if the pocket collection is positive, it seems legitimate to ask ourselves if we should not aim at a generalization of the urinary catheterization, as first intention, Having not acquired cleanliness, requiring a withdrawal of urine for suspicion of urinary infection.
Many centers continue to use urinary pocket collection mainly, as the survey technique seems too invasive and painful.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Rennes, France, 35200
- Rennes University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Children under 3 years of age who have not acquired the cleanliness present at the pediatric emergency department in Rennes, where urine sampling is necessary in case of suspected urinary tract infection.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of pain
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Score of the visual analog scale rated by the caregiver during the first performed gesture.
|
Day 0
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of pain
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Score of the visual analog scale rated by the parent during the first performed gesture.
|
Day 0
|
|
Evaluation of pain
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Score of the visual analog scale rated by the parent and the caregiver for the following gestures
|
Day 0
|
|
The experience of the gesture by the parent and the caregiver
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Evaluation by a questionnaire by choosing from the following proposals: Very well spent, well spent, badly spent or very badly spent |
Day 0
|
|
Time needed to collect urine
Time Frame: Day 0
|
Duration between the first gesture and the final urine collection
|
Day 0
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amelie Rickewaert, Rennes University Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 35RC16_3036_SONDAPU
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Urinary Tract Infections in Children
-
NCT07578870Recruiting
-
NCT07620054Not yet recruitingPneumonia in Children
-
NCT07399717Not yet recruitingPneumonia | Pneumonia in Children
-
NCT03462160UnknownPrevention of Urinary Tract Infections in Children
-
NCT07362433Not yet recruitingRespiratory Infections in Children
-
NCT04608851RecruitingUrinary Tract Infections in Children | Secondary Prevention
-
NCT03221504UnknownUrinary Tract Infections in Children
-
NCT04763967TerminatedUrinary Tract Infections in Children
-
NCT04066621CompletedPHase IV Clinical Trial of Ceftriaxone Sodium and Sulbactam Sodium for Injection (CRO-SBT) (CRO-SBT)Respiratory Tract Infections | Urinary Tract Infections in Children
-
NCT03825874RecruitingUrinary Tract Infections | Urinary Tract Infections in Children