Fecal Microbial Transplantation for C. Difficile and/or Ulcerative Colitis or Indeterminate Colitis (FMT)

February 21, 2022 updated by: Anupama Chawla, Stony Brook University

Fecal Microbial Transplantation in Patients With Medication Refractory Clostridium Difficile and/or Ulcerative Colitis or Indeterminate Colitis

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation will be offered to eligible C. difficile patients (does not require Investigational New Drug designation) and to eligible ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis patients as Investigational New Drug treatment

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The following hypothesis will be tested in this study:

  1. Fecal microbiota transplantation is a safe, tolerable, and efficacious procedure for C. difficile patients and is a safe and tolerable procedure for ulcerative colitis and indeterminate colitis patients.
  2. The fecal microbial diversity, composition and function in stool recipients after fecal transplantation will change to a similar microbial diversity, composition and functionality as found in donor stool.

Primary objectives:

1. To determine the short term safety and tolerability of fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis up to 12 weeks post-transplant.

Secondary objectives:

1a. To determine the long term safety and tolerability of fecal microbiota transplantation up to 1 year post-transplant in patients with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.

1b. To determine the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile defined as no recurrence of C. difficile within one year.

2. To compare microbial diversity in healthy donor stools compared to pre-FMT recipient stools collected from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.

3. To compare microbial composition in healthy donor stools compared to pre-FMT recipient stools from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.

4. To compare microbial function in healthy donor stools compared to pre-FMT recipient stools from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.

5. To compare microbial diversity in healthy donor stools and pre-FMT recipient stools with 1 week post-transplant recipient stool samples collected from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.

6. To compare microbial composition in healthy donor stools and pre-FMT recipient stools with 1 week post-transplant recipient stool samples collected from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.

7. To compare microbial function in healthy donor stools and pre-FMT recipient stools with 1 week post-transplant recipient stool samples collected from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.

8. To compare microbial diversity in healthy donor stools and pre-FMT recipient stools with 12 week post transplant recipient stool samples collected from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.

9. To compare microbial composition in healthy donor stools and pre-FMT recipient stools with 12 week post transplant recipient stool samples collected from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.

10. To compare microbial function in healthy donor stools and pre-FMT recipient stools with 12 week post transplant recipient stool samples collected from patients (recipients) with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile and medication refractory Ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis.

11. Stool calprotectin levels will be measured in the recipient at baseline pre-FMT, 1 week and 12 weeks post FMT to determine if FMT causes a statistically significant change.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
12

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794
        • Stony Brook University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

For C. difficile patients/recipients only:

Inclusion:

1. Patient is 7 years of age or older. 2. One of the following: 2a. At least two recurrences (total three CDI infections) of mild to moderate C. difficile (<6 diarrheal stools/day) diagnosed by positive toxin PCR or EIA after completing standard medical therapy with metronidazole, vancomycin or fidaxomicin.

2b. At least two episodes of severe C. difficile infection (>6 diarrheal stools/day requiring hospitalization and associated with significant morbidity).

2c. Moderate C. difficile infection (3-6 diarrheal stools/day not responding to successive standard therapy, e.g. metronidazole, vancomycin and/or fidaxomicin) lasting at least 28 days.

2d. Severe and/or fulminant C. difficile colitis (> 6 diarrheal stools/day) with no response to standard therapy after 48 hours.

Exclusion:

  1. younger than 7 year old
  2. scheduled for abdominal surgery within the next 12 weeks
  3. had major abdominal surgery within the past 3 months
  4. pregnancy
  5. Hemoglobin < 6 g/dL
  6. absolute neutrophil count less than 1500/mm3
  7. known diagnosis of graft vs. host disease
  8. used an investigational drug within the past 2 months
  9. used a TNFα agonist within the past 2 weeks
  10. diagnosed with Bacteremia within the past 4 weeks

For patients with ulcerative and indeterminate colitis only:

Inclusion:

  1. Patient is 7 years of age or older.
  2. One of the following:

2a. treated with steroid therapy for at least one month. 2b. treated with immunomodulatory therapy for at least one month 2c. treated with biological therapy for at least one month.

Exclusion:

  1. younger than 7 years old
  2. scheduled for abdominal surgery within the next 12 weeks
  3. had major abdominal surgery within the past 3 months
  4. pregnancy
  5. Hemoglobin < 6 g/dL
  6. absolute neutrophil count less than 1500/mm3
  7. known diagnosis of graft vs. host disease
  8. used an investigational drug within the past 2 months
  9. used a TNFα agonist within the past 2 weeks
  10. diagnosed with Bacteremia within the past 4 weeks
  11. previous FMT

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Fecal microbial transplantation
Treated with fecal microbial transplantation
Biological: Fecal Microbial Transplantation

Fecal microbial transplant is offered as treatment option to eligible patients. Donors selected by the patients will be screened by questionnaire and by blood and stool tests for potential transmissible pathogens.

The stool filtrate will be administered in the ileum and/or cecum via colonoscopy

Other Names:
  • FMT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Time Frame: 9 years

Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events with grade greater than 2 within one year after FMT will be reported.

Safety will be assessed as a report of no new medical condition after the transplant, Tolerability, as recorded by report of no serious adverse events after the transplant and Efficacy of the procedure will be recorded as improvement in clinical symptoms during any clinically indicated colonoscopies after the transplant as compared to before transplant

C. Diff patients will have a negative C. diff test report after the transplant as an out come measure.
9 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To measure the effect of fecal microbial transplantation on microbial diversity in healthy donor stools compared to pre-FMT, 1 week post FMT, and 12 weeks post-FMT recipient stools.
Time Frame: 10 years
Fecal DNA samples will undergo V3-V4 16S rRNA sequencing. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) will be produced by clustering sequences with identical taxonomic assignments. Alpha diversity indices (e.g. Chao1, Shannon complexity H, Shannon Evenness H/Hmax) will be calculated inferred through 1000 replicate resamplings using Explicet. Beta diversity (Bray-Curtis and Jaccard distances) will be calculated for the recipient Pre-FMT, 1 week post-FMT and 12 weeks post-FMT as compared to their pared donor using the adonis function in the R vegan package at the phyla, family and genus level. A linear mixed model will be used to compare alpha-diversity (ShannonH) and beta-diversity (Bray-Curtis and Jaccard distance) between each timepoint (FMT) and each disease group (Group). P-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
10 years
To measure the effect of fecal microbial transplantation on microbial composition in healthy donor stools compared to pre-FMT, 1 week post FMT, and 12 weeks post-FMT recipient stools.
Time Frame: 10 years
Fecal DNA samples will undergo V3-V4 16S rRNA sequencing. Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) will be produced by clustering sequences with identical taxonomic assignments. Linear mixed models analyses on individual OTUs at the genus level will be conducted on 105 OTUs after eliminating OTUs with an average relative abundance of < 0.001% in the donor and recipient pre-FMT samples, and after discarding OTUs where more than 75% of the samples had a zero count. To compare the relative abundance of each OTU between timepoints before and after FMT [pre-transplant recipient, 1-wk. post-FMT recipient, 3-mos. post-FMT recipient] and each disease group, a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) or generalized estimating equation (GEE) will be used by taking the actual counts of each OTU as the outcomes that were assumed to follow a negative binomial distribution. The p-values will be adjusted for multiple comparisons by the Bonferroni correction or by the Benjamin-Hochberg method (FDR < 0.05).
10 years
To measure the effect of fecal microbial transplantation on microbial function using shotgun DNA metagenomic in healthy donor stools compared to pre-FMT, 1 week post FMT, and 12 weeks post-FMT recipient stools.
Time Frame: 10 years
Fecal DNA samples will undergo shotgun DNA metagenomics sequencing. After removing human sequences, the Reads per kilobase gene length (RKP) will be calculated using HUMANN2 software for individual bacterial proteins/enzymes and pathways. . A linear mixed model will be used to compare RPK associated with pathways and individual proteins between each timepoint (FMT) and each disease group (Group). P-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.Linear mixed models analyses on the RPK associated with individual genes and pathways will be analyzed using linear mixed models between timepoints before and after FMT [pre-transplant recipient, 1-wk. post-FMT recipient, 3-mos. post-FMT recipient] and each disease group, a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) or generalized estimating equation (GEE) were used by taking the actual RPK as the outcomes that will be assumed to follow a negative binomial distribution.
10 years
To measure the effect of fecal microbial transplantation on microbial function using bacterial metatranscriptomic sequencing
Time Frame: 10 years
Fecal RNA samples will undergo bacterial metatranscriptomic RNA sequencing. After removing human sequences, the Reads per kilobase transcript (RKP) will be calculated for individual bacterial proteins/enzymes and pathways. A linear mixed model will be used to compare RPK associated with pathways and individual proteins between each timepoint (FMT) and each disease group (Group). P-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
10 years
To measure the effect of fecal microbial transplantation on microbial function using targeted metabolomic assays.
Time Frame: 10 years
Fecal samples will undergo extraction for targeted metabolomics analysis of short chain fatty acids (micrograms/gram stool) using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and of bile acids (microgram/gram stool) using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. A linear mixed model will be used to compare respectively short chain fatty acid and bile acid metabolites between each timepoint (FMT) and each disease group (Group). P-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
10 years
Determine if FMT causes a statistically significant change in recipient fecal calprotectin levels
Time Frame: 10 years
Fecal calprotectin (microgram/gram stool) levels will be measured as in the recipient at baseline pre-FMT, 1 week, and 12 weeks post FMT. A linear mixed model will be used to compare fecal calprotectin levels between each timepoint (FMT) and each disease group (Group). P-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
10 years
Determine number of C. difficile recipients who have recurrent C. difficile within a year after fecal microbial transplant
Time Frame: 10 years
Currently the efficacy of colonoscopic FMT is approximately 90% after 12 weeks. However it may be lower with patients who also have inflammatory bowel disease. We will quantify the efficacy of fecal microbial transplant on C. difficile recurrence within a year in patients with C. difficile without inflammatory bowel diseases, C. difficile with Crohn's disease and C. difficile with ulcerative or indeterminate colitis.
10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Stony Brook University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Anupama Chawla, MD, Stony Brook Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 31, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 21, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 479696

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ulcerative Colitis

Clinical Trials on Fecal Microbial Transplantation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings