A Study of Midostaurin Efficacy and Safety in Newly Diagnosed Patients With FLT3-mutated AML

March 18, 2025 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-center, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Twice Daily Oral Midostaurin in Combination With Daunorubicin/Cytarabine Induction, High-dose Cytarabine Consolidation, and Midostaurin Single Agent Continuation Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Patients With FLT3-mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of midostaurin in combination with daunorubicin/cytarabine induction, high dose cytarabine consolidation and midostaurin single agent continuation therapy in newly diagnosed patients with FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This was a Phase II, multi-center trial consisting of two parts; Part 1: an open label, safety evaluation part in Japan only (minimum of three evaluable subjects) and Part 2: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled part (60 subjects). Part 1 in Japan and Part 2 outside Japan were initiated simultaneously. Part 1 was conducted to evaluate the safety and tolerability of midostaurin in combination with daunorubicin/cytarabine induction and high-dose cytarabine consolidation in Japanese subjects and was a pre-requisite before allowing participation of Japan in Part 2. Data from Part 1 was reviewed by an Independent safety Committee (ISC) designated by the Sponsor. The ISC reviewed all available safety data in subjects from Japan up to the time of the safety review data cut-off date (6-Sep-2018). A meeting with the ISC was held on 25-Sep-2018: based on safety evaluation in three evaluable subjects, the ISC members recommended to start Part 2 in Japan.

Part 2 of the study included screening phase, treatment phase composed of up to 18 cycles of midostaurin/placebo treatment in combination with chemotherapy (daunorubicin and cytarabine) during induction and consolidation and alone during continuation and 30 days safety follow up from last dose of study treatment (daunorubicin or cytarabine or midostaurin/placebo); and follow up phase for continued remission and survival follow-up (until 36 months after Day 1 of the last subject). Subjects who provided written informed consent were screened for eligibility during the period up to 7 days immediately prior to starting chemotherapy (Day 1). The subject was randomized at Day 8 to receive either midostaurin or placebo only if FLT3 status was mutated. Treatment phase included induction, consolidation and continuation therapies.

Induction therapy: All screened subjects started induction therapy with chemotherapy from Day 1 to Day 7, while the FLT3 mutation status was being determined. Subjects who achieved CR already with induction Cycle 1 went directly to consolidation therapy without a second cycle of induction therapy. Subjects who did not achieve CR with one cycle of induction received a second induction cycle with same treatment as in Cycle 1. Subjects who did not achieve CR after induction 2 discontinued the study treatment and were followed in safety follow up and survival follow-up.

Consolidation therapy: Subjects who achieved a CR after 1 or 2 cycles of induction received consolidation therapy with 3 cycles of high-dose cytarabine for the Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group (JALSG) regimen and 4 cycles of high-dose cytarabine as tolerated for the Randomized AML Trial In FLT3+ subjects <60 Years old (RATIFY) regimen. Subjects received midostaurin/placebo, orally twice a day, on Days 8 to 21 of each cycle. Each consolidation cycle began within two weeks following hematopoietic recovery (ANC ≥ 1.0 x 109/L, platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L) but no sooner than four weeks from the beginning of the previous cycle.

Continuation therapy: After hematopoietic recovery (ANC ≥ 1.0 x 109/L, platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L) following the final cycle of consolidation but no sooner than 14 days after the last dose of midostaurin/placebo during the last consolidation cycle, subjects who maintained a CR received up to 12 cycles (28 days/cycle) of continuous therapy with midostaurin or placebo twice a day. Safety was assessed in this treatment phase for each subject until 30 days after the end of treatment (EOT) and included routine safety monitoring.

The follow-up phases included post treatment follow-up and survival follow-up. During post-treatment follow-up, all subjects continued to be assessed for relapse i.e. every 2 months during years 1 and 2, every 3 months on year 3 and 4 and then yearly and at time of relapse until relapse, withdrawal of consent, death, loss to follow up, or end of study, whichever was earlier following the end of study treatment for any reason other than persistent AML. Subjects who discontinued study treatment due to persistent AML or relapse and the post treatment follow-up phase due to relapse entered a survival follow-up period during which survival was recorded every 3 months. Survival information was obtained by clinical visits or telephone calls or other means until death, withdrawal of consent, lost to follow-up or end of study, whichever was earlier.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
67

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Hong Kong
      • Pokfulam, Hong Kong
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Japan
      • Aomori, Japan, 030 8553
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Fukuoka, Japan, 810-8563
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kochi, Japan, 781 8555
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kyoto, Japan, 606 8507
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Osaka, Japan, 534-0021
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Yamagata, Japan, 990 9585
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Aichi
      • Nagoya, Aichi, Japan, 466-8650
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Toyoake city, Aichi, Japan, 470 1192
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Chiba
      • Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan, 277 8577
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Fukuoka
      • Fukuoka city, Fukuoka, Japan, 812-8582
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Fukushima
      • Fukushima city, Fukushima, Japan, 960 1295
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Hokkaido
      • Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan, 064 0804
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Kanagawa
      • Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan, 259-1193
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Nagasaki
      • Nagasaki-city, Nagasaki, Japan, 852-8501
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Okayama
      • Okayama city, Okayama, Japan, 701-1192
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Osaka
      • Osaka Sayama, Osaka, Japan, 589 8511
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Osaka-city, Osaka, Japan, 543-8555
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Shizuoka
      • Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan, 432-8580
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Tochigi
      • Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan, 329-0498
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Tokyo
      • Bunkyo ku, Tokyo, Japan, 113-8677
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 113-8603
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Shinagawa ku, Tokyo, Japan, 141 8625
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 06351
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03722
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Seocho Gu
      • Seoul, Seocho Gu, Korea, Republic of, 06591
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Russian Federation
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 125284
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 123182
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197341
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Taiwan
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 83301
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 10002
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Taoyuan, Taiwan, 33305
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Chiayi Hsien
      • Putzu City, Chiayi Hsien, Taiwan, 61363
        • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Vietnam
      • Hanoi, Vietnam, 100000
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of AML (≥ 20% blasts in the bone marrow based on WHO 2016 classification). Patients with APL (acute promyelocytic leukemia) with PML-RARA are not eligible
  • Documented presence of an ITD and/or TKD activating mutation in the FLT3 gene, as determined by analysis in a Novartis designated laboratory An exception will be patients who are enrolled into the part 1 in Japan, who may be treated with midostaurin irrespective of AML FLT3 genotype.

  • Patients must meet the following laboratory value criteria that indicate adequate organ function at the screening visit:

    • Estimated creatinine clearance ≥ 30 ml/min
    • Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, except in the setting of isolated Gilbert syndrome
    • Aspartate transaminase (AST) ≤ 3.0 x ULN
    • Alanine transaminase (ALT) ≤ 3.0 x ULN
  • Suitability for intensive chemotherapy in the judgment of the investigator

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurologic symptoms suggestive of CNS leukemia unless CNS leukemia has been excluded by a lumbar puncture. Patients with CSF fluid positive for AML blasts are not eligible
  • Developed therapy-related AML after prior radiotherapy (RT) or chemotherapy for another cancer or disorder
  • Known hypersensitivity to midostaurin, cytarabine or daunorubicin or to any of the excipients of midostaurin/placebo, cytarabine or daunorubicin
  • Abnormal chest X-ray unless the abnormality represents a non-active, or non-clinically significant finding, such as scarring (subjects with controlled non active lung infection are eligible)
  • Known impairment of gastrointestinal (GI) function or GI disease that might alter significantly the absorption of midostaurin
  • Cardiac or cardiac repolarization abnormality
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
  • Women of child-bearing potential, unless they are using highly effective methods of contraception during dosing and for 4 months after stopping medication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Midostaurin
Patients took study drug on day 8-21 during induction and consolidation phase; then on days 1-28 for 12 cycles in the continuation (post consolidation) phase.
Drug: Midostaurin
Midostaurin 50 mg [two 25 mg capsules] were administered twice per day by mouth on day 8-21 during induction and consolidation phase; then on days 1-28 for 12 cycles in the continuation (post consolidation) phase.
Other Names:
  • PKC412
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Patients took placebo on day 8-21 during induction and consolidation phase; then on days 1-28 for 12 cycles in the continuation (post consolidation) phase.
Drug: Placebo
Placebo, two capsules, were administered twice per day by mouth on day 8-21 during induction and consolidation phase; then on days 1-28 for 12 cycles in the continuation (post consolidation) phase.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Safety Events (Part 1, Japan Only)
Time Frame: up to Day 21 of the first Consolidation cycle; cycle = 28 days
Percentage of Safety Events, defined as death or serious adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation that occurs on or before Day 21 of the first Consolidation cycle. This was determined by the Independent Safety Committee (ISC) to be definitely or probably related to midostaurin. Percentage was calculated based on the percentage of subjects with safety event out of 3 evaluable subjects in Part 1.
up to Day 21 of the first Consolidation cycle; cycle = 28 days
Event Free Survival (EFS) (Part 2 - Randomized, Controlled)
Time Frame: up to 3 years after last patient started treatment

Event Free survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization until an EFS event is observed. An EFS event is defined as a failure to obtain a complete remission (CR) within an induction 2, relapse after CR, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.

The objective was to evaluate the efficacy based on EFS of midostaurin versus placebo in combination with daunorubicin/cytarabine induction, with high-dose cytarabine consolidation, and with midostaurin single agent continuation therapy in newly diagnosed patients with FLT3-mutated AML.
up to 3 years after last patient started treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: up to 3 years after last patient started treatment
Overall survival defined as the time from the date of randomization to date of death due to any cause
up to 3 years after last patient started treatment
Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR)
Time Frame: up to 3 years after last patient started treatment
Complete Remission is defined as the percentage of participants with a CR according to Chelson Criteria, at various timepoints
up to 3 years after last patient started treatment
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Incidence of Relapse (CIR)
Time Frame: up to 3 years after last patient started treatment
CIR (only for patients who achieved CR after study treatment initiation), is measured from the date of first CR to relapse or death due to AML, whichever occurs first.
up to 3 years after last patient started treatment
Pharmakinetics (PK) for Midostaurin: AUClast & AUC0-t
Time Frame: Induction Phase: Pre-dose and 1, 3, 6 and 12 hours post dose in Cycle 1 Day 8
Evaluate AUClast & AUC0-t PK parameters for midostaurin. AUClast: The AUC from time zero to the last measurable concentration sampling time (Tlast) (mass x time x volume-1) AUC0-t: The area under the curve (AUC) from time zero to a measurable concentration sampling time (t) (mass x time x volume-1).
Induction Phase: Pre-dose and 1, 3, 6 and 12 hours post dose in Cycle 1 Day 8
Pharmakinetics (PK) for Midostaurin: Cmax
Time Frame: Induction Phase: Pre-dose and 1, 3, 6 and 12 hours post dose in Cycle 1 Day 8
Evaluate Cmax parameter for midostaurin. Cmax: The maximum (peak) observed plasma drug concentration after the first dose administration of midostaurin (mass x volume-1).
Induction Phase: Pre-dose and 1, 3, 6 and 12 hours post dose in Cycle 1 Day 8
Metabolite CGP52421: PK Parameters AUClast, AUC0-t
Time Frame: Induction Phase: Cycle 1 Day 8
Evaluate the pharmacokinetic of major metabolite of midostaurin CGP52421. AUClast: The AUC from time zero to the last measurable concentration sampling time (Tlast) (mass x time x volume-1) AUC0-t: The area under the curve (AUC) from time zero to a measurable concentration sampling time (t) (mass x time x volume-1).
Induction Phase: Cycle 1 Day 8
Metabolite CGP52421: PK Parameter Cmax
Time Frame: Induction Phase: Cycle 1 Day 8
Evaluate the pharmacokinetic of major metabolite of midostaurin CGP52421: Cmax. Cmax: The maximum (peak) observed plasma drug concentration after the first dose administration of midostaurin (mass x volume-1).
Induction Phase: Cycle 1 Day 8
Metabolite CGP62221: PK Parameters: AUClast, AUC0-t
Time Frame: Induction Phase: Cycle 1 Day 8
Evaluate the pharmacokinetic of major metabolite of Midostaurin CGP62221 PK parameters AUClast, AUC0-t
Induction Phase: Cycle 1 Day 8
Metabolite CGP62221: PK Parameter: Cmax
Time Frame: Induction Phase: Cycle 1 Day 8

Evaluate the pharmacokinetic of major metabolite of Midostaurin CGP62221 PK parameter Cmax.

Cmax: The maximum (peak) observed plasma drug concentration after the first dose administration of midostaurin (mass x volume-1).
Induction Phase: Cycle 1 Day 8
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Per European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30
Time Frame: EOI: up to 1.84 months (after 2 cycles); EOCons: up to 5.52 months (after 4 cycles); EOCont: up to 16.56 months (after 12 cycles); EOT: up to 16.56 months maximum, depending on treatment duration; each cycle = 28 days
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire with multi-item scales and single-item measures, including five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial impact), and a global health status/QoL scale. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher response levels. High functional scale scores denote healthy functioning, high global QoL scores indicate high QoL, and high symptom scores reflect high symptom levels. Scoring follows the EORTC Scoring Manual, reported by absolute change from baseline. EOI = End of Induction; EOCons = End of Consolidation; EOCont = End of Continuation; EOT = End of Treatment.
EOI: up to 1.84 months (after 2 cycles); EOCons: up to 5.52 months (after 4 cycles); EOCont: up to 16.56 months (after 12 cycles); EOT: up to 16.56 months maximum, depending on treatment duration; each cycle = 28 days
Quality of Life (QoL) Per Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: EOI: up to 1.84 months (after 2 cycles); EOCons: up to 5.52 months (after 4 cycles); EOCont: up to 16.56 months (after 12 cycles); EOT: up to 16.56 months maximum, depending on treatment duration; each cycle = 28 days
The PGIC is a single self-reported item that asks about change in status of subject's overall satisfaction with medication since starting the standalone study. The specific wording of the PGIC is "Directions: Circle the one number that best describes how your overall satisfaction with your medication had changed since starting the study": "Very much improved" =1; "Much improved" =2; "Minimally improved" =3; "No change" =4; "Minimally worse" =5; "Much worse" =6; "Very much worse" =7. PGI-C questions have been widely used to assess the patient perspective of improvement in clinical trials and have shown clinical validity in a variety of indications, including depression, urinary incontinence and adult asthma and the PGIC score determined frequencies and percentages by scheduled timepoint. EOI = End of Induction; EOCons = End of Consolidation; EOCont = End of Continuation; EOT = End of Treatment.
EOI: up to 1.84 months (after 2 cycles); EOCons: up to 5.52 months (after 4 cycles); EOCont: up to 16.56 months (after 12 cycles); EOT: up to 16.56 months maximum, depending on treatment duration; each cycle = 28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 14, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 14, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 18, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CPKC412A2220

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.

This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Midostaurin

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings