Comparison Between Initial Routine PICC and General IV Access in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients
Comparison of Safety, Efficacy, and Patient-perceived Satisfaction Between Initial Routine Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Insertion and General Intravenous Access in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: A Randomized Phase II Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Reliable intravenous (IV) access is an important issue in terminally ill cancer patients, however, they have limited or no peripheral venous access due to edema or long period of IV therapy. Thus, intravenous access has been provided by Central venous catheter (CVC).
There are some options for applying CVC in cancer patients; subclavian venous catheter (SVC), chemo-port (CP), and the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC).
When considering the characteristics of terminally ill cancer patients, such as poor general condition and a limited period of survival, PICC could be a safe and effective method for intravenous access.
There are two previous studies concerned about PICC study in terminally ill cancer patients. They showed that PICC might be overall safe and efficient in terminally ill cancer patients. However, these studies did not evaluate superiority of PICC insertion compared to no insertion and the appropriate time for PICC insertion due to limitation of their design, such as retrospective or single-arm observational study. Thus, strategies of PICC insertion for IV access in terminally ill cancer patients have not been determined until now.
Considering the favorable results of PICC insertion in previous studies and limited survival time of terminally ill cancer patients, the investigator postulated that routine PICC insertion at the time of admission for terminal care would be effective for IV access.
Thus, the investigator assumed that initially routine PICC insertion would be non-inferior in maintenance success rate / and complication rate compared to general IV access. In addition, it would be superior in patient-perceived satisfaction. The inveistigator will undertake a randomized phase II study to confirm the hypothesis.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Gyeongsangnam-do
-
Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea, Republic of, 50612
- Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Cancer patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed malignancy and fulfilled all of the following conditions
- Patients with expected survival time of 3 months or less due to a progressive disease without additional anticancer treatment. (However, palliative radiation treatment for symptom control is allowed.)
- Patients who need the IV access route continuously for hydration or medication.
- Age18 or older
- Signed and dated informed consent of document indicating that the patient (or legally acceptable representative) has been informed about all pertinent aspects of the trial prior to enrollment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who showed severe coagulopathy such as thrombocytopenia (Platelet count ≤ 20,000/mm2) or international normalized ratio (INR) prolongation (≥2.0 ) in spite of treatment
Patients who have an evidence of current sepsis (bacteremia or fungemia)
- 'current' means bacteremia/fungemia without eradication on follow-up peripheral blood culture
- patients with persistent fever (bacteremia or fungemia cannot be ruled out)
- Patients who is impracticable to PICC insertion due to uncontrolled behavioral disorders
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Routine PICC group
PICC is initially routine insertion at the time of admission of hospice-palliative care unit
|
comparisons of the safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction between the initially routine PICC insertion group (routine PICC group) and general IV access group (general IV group)
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: General IV group
PICC is inserted if 3 or more times of IV insertion trial per day is required for IV access
|
comparisons of the safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction between the initially routine PICC insertion group (routine PICC group) and general IV access group (general IV group)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
IV access maintenance success rate
Time Frame: From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years
|
rate of successful PICC maintenance until death or discharge/transfer
|
From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
PICC related complication rate
Time Frame: From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years
|
rate of any complication which is related with PICC
|
From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years
|
|
PICC premature removal rate
Time Frame: From date of enrollment until date of PICC removal, assess up to 2 years
|
rate of premature removal such as self-removal or CRBSI before death or discharge
|
From date of enrollment until date of PICC removal, assess up to 2 years
|
|
PICC life span
Time Frame: From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years
|
median survival of PICC
|
From date of enrollment until death or discharge/transfer, assess up to 2 years
|
|
patient perceived procedure-related distress
Time Frame: 5th day after procedure
|
procedure-related distress during insertion of PICC
|
5th day after procedure
|
|
patient perceived comfort and convenience assessed by a newly developed question in this study
Time Frame: 3th to 7th day after enrollment
|
patient perceived comfort and convenience ("How do participants feel comfort and convenience about the IV access?" at 3th - 7th days after enrollment
|
3th to 7th day after enrollment
|
|
colonization of microbiology in PICC
Time Frame: at the time of PICC removal, assess up to 2 years
|
Investigator evaluate the colonization of PICC using tip culture at the time of removal
|
at the time of PICC removal, assess up to 2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cleeland CS. Cancer-related symptoms. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2000 Jul;10(3):175-90. doi: 10.1053/srao.2000.6590.
- Bruera E, Sala R, Rico MA, Moyano J, Centeno C, Willey J, Palmer JL. Effects of parenteral hydration in terminally ill cancer patients: a preliminary study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr 1;23(10):2366-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.069.
- Mercadante S, Ferrera P, Girelli D, Casuccio A. Patients' and relatives' perceptions about intravenous and subcutaneous hydration. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Oct;30(4):354-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.04.004.
- Lam S, Scannell R, Roessler D, Smith MA. Peripherally inserted central catheters in an acute-care hospital. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Aug 22;154(16):1833-7.
- Ng PK, Ault MJ, Ellrodt AG, Maldonado L. Peripherally inserted central catheters in general medicine. Mayo Clin Proc. 1997 Mar;72(3):225-33. doi: 10.4065/72.3.225.
- Raad I, Davis S, Becker M, Hohn D, Houston D, Umphrey J, Bodey GP. Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe and cost-effective alternative for long-term venous access. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Aug 9;153(15):1791-6.
- Smith JR, Friedell ML, Cheatham ML, Martin SP, Cohen MJ, Horowitz JD. Peripherally inserted central catheters revisited. Am J Surg. 1998 Aug;176(2):208-11. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00121-4.
- Park K, Jun HJ, Oh SY. Safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction of peripherally inserted central catheters in terminally ill cancer patients: a prospective multicenter observational study. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Dec;24(12):4987-4992. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3360-6. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- SEPTIC II
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter
-
NCT05278507RecruitingPeripherally Inserted Central Catheter
-
NCT04263649CompletedPeripherally Inserted Central Catheter
-
NCT00565877CompletedPeripherally Inserted Central Catheter Insertion Technique
-
NCT03230357UnknownPeripherally Inserted Central Catheter
-
NCT02409589CompletedPeripherally Inserted Central Catheter | Intracavitary Electrocardiogram Guiding
-
NCT05399875Active, not recruitingInsertion of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter
-
NCT07209670Not yet recruitingCLABSI - Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection | Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter | Umbilical Venous Catheter
-
NCT04241926CompletedHemodynamic Monitoring | Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters | Centrally Inserted Central Catheter | Transpulmonary Thermodilution
-
NCT01578993CompletedAdult Patients With Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters
-
NCT07369427RecruitingPeripherally Inserted Central Catheters
Clinical Trials on peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)
-
NCT03392831UnknownThrombosis | Infection
-
NCT03908866UnknownInfection | Thromboses, Venous | Economic Problems
-
NCT02311452CompletedPneumonia | Appendicitis | Osteomyelitis
-
NCT05621473Not yet recruitingthe Incidence of PICC-related Complications
-
NCT03474978RecruitingCatheterization, Peripheral
-
NCT02314520CompletedCentral Venous Catheter | Central Line | PICC | Neuro ICU | Neuroscience ICU | CVC
-
NCT04263649CompletedPeripherally Inserted Central Catheter
-
NCT00226226Completed
-
NCT00226213Completed
-
NCT03647293CompletedPain | Central Venous Catheter | Neonates