Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Liver Biopsy

February 8, 2019 updated by: AdventHealth

Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Liver Biopsy Using a 22 Gauge Fine Needle Biopsy Needle.

This is a prospective study to determine the optimal technique for obtaining liver tissue with a smaller caliber (22 gauge) needle and whether a good core biopsy can be obtained without the use of suction and secondly to determine the diagnostic yield and safety of 22 g Fine Needle Biopsy needle for liver biopsy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Liver biopsy (LB) has historically been performed by percutaneous route without image guidance (blind biopsy). However, in the last several years there has been more reliance on image guidance ultrasound-guided (USG) or computed tomography (CT) to direct the needle into the liver with the hope of limiting complications. Other ways of performing liver biopsy are transjugular fluoroscopy guided approach when percutaneous route is deemed not safe because of coagulopathy or ascites. Surgical LB (either laparoscopic or open) is yet another way of obtaining liver tissue.

Endoscopic ultrasound guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is proposed as a newer method that may offer several potential advantages over existing techniques for attaining liver tissue. It can be performed in an outpatient setting and offers the comfort of sedation and analgesia. Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) provides high resolution images of left lobe of the liver and a good portion of the right lobe of the liver. This coupled with Doppler capability the biopsy needle can be safely directed into the liver for sampling under real time image guidance. Intervening structures such as pleura, bowel loops and gallbladder can be easily seen by EUS and thus avoided that further decreases the risk of adverse events. It has been recognized that sampling error can lead to diagnostic inaccuracy of a biopsy from a single site. As compared to USG or CT scan the EUS allows easy and safe biopsy of both left and right lobes of the liver during same setting, potentially addressing concerns about sampling error.

The cost of the endoscopic procedure is the main expense of EUS-LB. Thus this approach is best used for patients requiring EUS for evaluation of elevated liver tests. If no obstructive lesion is identified by EUS that will require endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) then it would cost-effective to perform EUS-LB during the same setting without much additional time and risks. This approach can spare the patient the additional discomfort and expense of a second dedicated LB procedure by any of the other available techniques (percutaneous, transjugular etc.). In such setting the equipment costs for the EUS-LB will mainly include only the Fine Needle Biopsy (FNB) needle, which is similar in expense to the cost of needles for the transjugular or percutaneous approach.

The traditionally used transcutaneous LB needle is 16 gauge (G) while largest EUS biopsy needle is 19 G. The smaller size of the needle is expected to decrease the complications rate (mainly pain and bleeding) even further. Many studies using a 19 G Tru-cut biopsy or Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) needle to acquire liver tissue have obtained specimens adequate for histologic diagnosis but there has been a wide range of specimen adequacy (19-100%). The 19 G Tru-cut biopsy needle has been associated with several technical difficulties that could reflect negatively on tissue adequacy.

While it is easy and straight forward to biopsy the left lobe of the liver with any EUS needle. The 19 G needle is a large bore needle for EUS use and it is sometimes difficult to attain an adequate position for biopsy specially in duodenum where scope is torqued and this is the only area of access to right lobe.

In this study the investigators will use a 22 G needle. Smaller caliber of the needle would not only make it technically easier to access right lobe of the liver through the duodenum, it is also expected to decrease the risks further due to smaller size. Also, the 22 G EUS-FNB needle has three cutting points at the cutting edge of the needle that provide stability at puncture while the high quality, fully formed heels are designed to maximize tissue capture and minimize fragmentation, that would result in attaining a good histological specimen, a main stay for liver biopsy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32803
        • Center for Interventional Endoscopy - Florida Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. All patients referred to Florida Hospital Endoscopy Unit for assessment of elevated liver tests with EUS and are found to have no obstructive lesion to explain elevation of liver tests and will not require ERCP.
  2. Age ≥ 19 years
  3. Willing to provide informed consent verbal or written.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age <19 years
  2. Unable to safely undergo EUS for any reason
  3. Coagulopathy (INR >1.6, Thrombocytopenia with platelet count <50,000/ml) for subjects on anti-coagulation therapy.
  4. Unwilling or cognitively unable to provide informed consent verbal or written.
  5. Pregnancy (confirmed with Standard of Care urine pregnancy test for all women with child-bearing potential only)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 22 gauge needle liver biopsy
EUS-LB will be performed using a 22 g FNB needle. Specimens obtained from each pass will be placed in a separate biopsy jar. If the third pass does not result in sufficient diagnostic material, a 19 G will be used. A maximum of 3 passes will be made using the alternate needle. The total number of passes with the 22 G needle and the 19 G needle is 6. Data will be collected about the procedure and the performance of the needles for each procedure.
Other: 22 gauge needle liver biopsy
EUS will be performed. Specimens obtained from each pass will be placed in a separate biopsy jar. If the third pass does not result in sufficient diagnostic material, a 19 G will be used. A maximum of 3 passes will be made using the alternate needle. The total number of passes with the 22 G needle and the 19 G needle is 6. Data will be collected about the procedure and the performance of the needles for each procedure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic adequacy of the liver biopsy specimen
Time Frame: Sample obtained during EUS-guided liver biopsy.
Determine the diagnostic adequacy of the liver biopsy specimen by obtaining a histological specimen using a smaller (22 G) caliber needle. Diagnostic adequacy is defined as a sample that provides definitive pathological diagnosis (yes, no).
Sample obtained during EUS-guided liver biopsy.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visible core
Time Frame: Sample obtained during EUS-guided liver biopsy.
The sample will have a visible core (yes/no).
Sample obtained during EUS-guided liver biopsy.
Suction
Time Frame: Sample obtained during EUS-guided liver biopsy.
Sample was obtained using suction (yes/no).
Sample obtained during EUS-guided liver biopsy.
Number of passes required histological samples
Time Frame: Time of Liver biopsy
Assessing the median number of passes required to obtain diagnostically adequate histological samples histological samples
Time of Liver biopsy
Technical failure
Time Frame: Time of Liver biopsy
Was there a technical failure (yes/no).
Time of Liver biopsy
Complications/Bleeding
Time Frame: 1 month
Assessing subjects for post-procedural complications via follow up phone calls. Bleeding (yes/no).
1 month
Complications/Pain
Time Frame: 1 month
Assessing subjects for post-procedural complications via follow up phone calls. Pain (yes/no).
1 month
Complications/Infection
Time Frame: 1 Month
Assessing subjects for post-procedural complications via follow up phone calls. Infection (yes/no).
1 Month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AdventHealth

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Muhammad Hasan, MD, Florida Hospital - Center for Interventional Endoscopy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 19, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 8, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1055744

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to share the individual participant data with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatic Cancer

Clinical Trials on 22 gauge needle liver biopsy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings