Cerebral Reorganization in Cervical Myelopathy Measured by Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (CReMe)

October 12, 2017 updated by: Anna Zdunczyk, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Cerebral Reorganization in Cervical Myelopathy

In degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) the dynamics of disease progression and the outcome after surgical decompression vary inter individually and do not necessarily correlate with radiological findings. By better characterization of the underlying pathophysiology this study aims to improve diagnostic power in DCM using Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

120 patients with DCM due to cervical spinal canal stenosis will be examined preoperatively and postoperatively with nTMS. On the basis of the initial Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) Score two patient groups will be established (JOA≤12/>12). The resting motor threshold, recruitment curve, cortical silent period and motor area will be determined. Accordingly, 40 healthy subjects will be examined.

To the investigators knowledge, this study is the first to analyze changes of corticospinal excitability and reorganization in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy with navigated TMS. In the present study, there was a significant difference in parameters of excitability and motor area activation between the severely symptomatic and clinically stable patient group. The investigators analysis showed that chronic CSM induces a recruitment of the non-primary motor area and corticospinal disinhibition, so that axonal damage can be compensated through recruitment of new cortical and supplementary motor connections, to a certain degree. Upon exhaustion of these mechanisms further axonal damage translates directly into new neurological deficits. These results lay the ground for a novel concept in CSM, the "corticospinal reserve capacity".

This study lays the foundation for future research to examine the pathomechanisms in CSM. Functional reorganization occurs on a spinal as well as on a cortical level. The concept of the corticospinal reseve capacity describes a compensatory, increased recruitment of non primary motor areas and corticospinal disinhibition in order to preserve motor function. By detecting the degree of reorganization, a stratification for an unfavourable as well as stable clinical course could be made. This innovative approach to describe the pathomechanisms in CSM might revise current concepts of clinical diagnostics and might have an impact on future treatment strategies.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
160

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Recruiting
        • Department of neurosurgery Charité
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Peter Vajkoczy, M.D.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Thomas Picht, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sandro Krieg, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Carolin Weiss-Lucas, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Kathleen Seidel, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  • patients with symptomatic/asymptomatic cervical spondylotic myelopathy scheduled for surgery or conservative Treatment
  • healthy subjects without any neurological disease

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with symptomatic/asymptomatic cervical spondylotic myelopathy scheduled for surgery (anterior and/ or posterior decompression) or conservative treatment. The radiological inclusion criteria are cervical spinal stenosis (C3-C7) associated with or without intramedullary high signal intensity lesion on T2-weighted MRI due to disc protrusion or spondylosis.
  • healthy subjects without any neurological disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria are other pathologies in the vicinity of the corticospinal tract above the lesion site (i.e. tumor, infarction), neuroinflammatory disease, high grade paresis of the upper extremity (BMRC<3), the existence of a cardiac pacemaker, deep brain stimulation electrodes or pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
mild myelopathy (JOA>12)
40 patients (JOA>12) suffering from symptomatic or asymptomatic degenerative cervical myelopathy scheduled for surgery or conservative treatment. The radiological inclusion criteria are cervical spinal stenosis associated with or without intramedullary high signal intensity lesion on T2-weighted MRI. Exclusion criteria are other pathologies in the vicinity of the corticospinal tract above the lesion site (i.e. tumor, infarction), neuroinflammatory disease, high grade paresis of the upper extremity (BMRC<3), the existence of a cardiac pacemaker, deep brain stimulation electrodes or pregnancy. By means of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation the resting motor threshold, recruitment curve, cortical silent period and motor area will be determined.
Diagnostic test: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
moderate myelopathy
40 patients (JOA≤12) suffering from symptomatic degenerative cervical myelopathy scheduled for surgery (anterior and/ or posterior decompression) or conservative treatment. The radiological inclusion criteria are cervical spinal stenosis associated with or without intramedullary high signal intensity lesion on T2-weighted MRI. Exclusion criteria are other pathologies in the vicinity of the corticospinal tract above the lesion site (i.e. tumor, infarction), neuroinflammatory disease, high grade paresis of the upper extremity (BMRC<3), the existence of a cardiac pacemaker, deep brain stimulation electrodes or pregnancy. By means of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation the resting motor threshold, recruitment curve, cortical silent period and motor area will be determined.
Diagnostic test: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
healthy control
As a control group, 40 subjects will be included into the study. Exclusion criteria and examination protocol are identical with the patient group. By means of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation the resting motor threshold, recruitment curve, cortical silent period and motor area will be determined.
Diagnostic test: Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Corticospinal reserve capacity
Time Frame: preoperative
Comparison of corticospinal reserve capacity (defined by recruitment curve, cortical silent period, motor area) compared to healthy control group
preoperative
Change in corticospinal reserve capacity
Time Frame: 9 months, 24 months postoperatively
Postoperative change in corticospinal reserve capacity compared to clinical symptoms
9 months, 24 months postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University Hospital Inselspital, Berne
University Hospital of Cologne
University Hospital Munich
German Spine Society (Deutsche Wirbelsäulenstiftung)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Anna Zdunczyk, M.D., Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 12, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 12, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 89830535

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

The study results, study protocol and study report will be shared with other Researchers during international congresses and peer reviewed publications

IPD Sharing Time Frame

during the time of the study

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

only as a congress presentation or publication presenting the results of the study

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Myelopathy

Clinical Trials on Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings