- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07298460
Stimulation-based Therapy to Improve Balance in DCM (STIM-DCM)
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation to Improve Postural Stability After Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if a treatment called transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), when combined with balance training, can help improve balance in adults who have had surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). DCM is a condition that affects the spinal cord in the neck and often causes problems with walking and balance, even after surgery.
This study will also look at how tSCS affects the nervous system and whether it is safe and practical to use in this group of patients. The results will help researchers plan a larger study in the future.
Main Questions:
- Does tSCS combined with balance training improve balance more than balance training alone?
- Does stimulation at both the neck and mid-back work better than stimulation at the mid-back only?
- What changes in nerve and muscle activity occur with tSCS?
What will happen in this study:
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups:
- tSCS applied to the mid-back (thoracic area) plus balance training
- tSCS applied to both the neck and mid-back (combined stimulation) plus balance training
- Sham stimulation (electrodes placed but no stimulation) plus balance training
- All participants will complete 12 sessions over 4 weeks (3 sessions per week).
- Each session will include 30 minutes of balance training and 30 minutes of walking exercises.
- Participants will receive stimulation or sham treatment during these sessions.
- Balance and walking tests will be done before and after the program.
- Nerve and muscle activity will also be measured at the same time points.
This pilot study will help determine if tSCS is effective and safe, and will provide information needed to design a larger trial.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53233
- Marquette University
-
Contact:
- Brian D Schmit, PhD
- Phone Number: (414) 288-6125
- Email: brian.schmit@marquette.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- DCM participants who have undergone surgery for DCM more than 12 months prior and report persistent impaired imbalance
Exclusion Criteria:
- uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disease, legal blindness, unstable medical condition that can interfere with the study, breakdown in skin area that will come into contact with electrodes, active implanted medical device, pregnancy, and seizures
- concurrent occupational or physical therapy during study participation for any condition
- history of inability to tolerate MEP/SSEP for any reason, or complete paralysis of the legs (lower limb mJOA=0)
- cognitive impairment and unable to give consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Thoracic tSCS + balance training
This intervention combines noninvasive thoracic transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) with a structured balance training program specifically for adults with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) who have undergone surgical decompression but continue to experience impaired balance.
|
This intervention combines noninvasive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) with a structured balance training program specifically for adults with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) who have undergone surgical decompression but continue to experience impaired balance.
Unlike standard physical therapy or other neuromodulation approaches, this protocol uses targeted stimulation sites and parameters-thoracic-only or combined cervico-thoracic stimulation-delivered concurrently with task-specific balance and gait training to enhance neuromotor recovery.
The stimulation is applied using a Chattanooga Vectra device at tolerable intensity, integrated into 12 sessions over 4 weeks.
This design uniquely addresses persistent postural instability in post-surgical DCM.
Structured balance and gait training will be performed for the participant.
|
|
Active Comparator: Combined cervical and thoracic tSCS + balance training
This intervention combines noninvasive combined cervical and thoracic transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) with a structured balance training program specifically for adults with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) who have undergone surgical decompression but continue to experience impaired balance.
|
This intervention combines noninvasive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) with a structured balance training program specifically for adults with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) who have undergone surgical decompression but continue to experience impaired balance.
Unlike standard physical therapy or other neuromodulation approaches, this protocol uses targeted stimulation sites and parameters-thoracic-only or combined cervico-thoracic stimulation-delivered concurrently with task-specific balance and gait training to enhance neuromotor recovery.
The stimulation is applied using a Chattanooga Vectra device at tolerable intensity, integrated into 12 sessions over 4 weeks.
This design uniquely addresses persistent postural instability in post-surgical DCM.
Structured balance and gait training will be performed for the participant.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham tSCS + balance training
This intervention combines sham transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) with a structured balance training program specifically for adults with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) who have undergone surgical decompression but continue to experience impaired balance.
|
Structured balance and gait training will be performed for the participant.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
The Berg Balance Scale is a validated clinical measure of static and dynamic balance.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude in the quadriceps of either leg
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude recorded from the quadriceps to assess changes in corticospinal excitability when comparing combined cervico-thoracic tSCS versus thoracic-only tSCS.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Center of pressure (CoP) path length and mean velocity during the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration for Balance (mCTSIB) with eyes closed on firm and foam surfaces
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Total displacement of the center of pressure during quiet standing with eyes closed on firm and foam surfaces, reflecting postural sway magnitude.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
Sensory Organization Test (SOT) - Somatosensory and Vestibular Score
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Quantifies reliance on somatosensory and vestibular input for balance under altered sensory conditions.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
Single-Leg Stance Time
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Duration of stable single-leg standing, assessing unilateral static balance capacity.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Performance-based measure of dynamic balance during complex walking tasks.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
6-Meter Walk Test Gait Speed
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Average walking speed over a short distance, reflecting functional mobility and gait efficiency.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Time required to stand, walk, turn, and sit, capturing functional mobility and fall risk.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
Responder Status (MCID Achievement)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Proportion of participants achieving a minimum clinically important improvement in predefined outcomes.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) Score
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Clinician-rated measure of neurological function in cervical myelopathy.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Patient-reported measure of neck-related functional disability.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Patient-reported pain intensity for neck, arm, leg, and device-related pain on a 0-10 scale.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
SF-36 Physical Component Score (PCS)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Generic health-related quality-of-life measure focused on physical functioning.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Clinician-rated assessment of overall change in patient condition.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Patient-reported perception of overall improvement or worsening.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
Fall Frequency
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Number of self-reported falls recorded prospectively in a fall diary.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse and serious adverse events.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
Lower-Extremity Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP) Latencies
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Cortical response latencies following peripheral stimulation, reflecting integrity and conduction efficiency of ascending somatosensory pathways.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) - Tibialis Anterior and Abductor Pollicis Brevis
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Evoked motor responses assessing corticospinal tract excitability and conduction to the lower extremities.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
|
Surface EMG Amplitude - Tibialis Anterior and Quadriceps
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Magnitude of muscle activation during stimulation, indexing neuromuscular recruitment of ankle dorsiflexors and knee extensors.
|
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
-
McMaster UniversityNot yet recruitingDegenerative Cervical Myelopathy
-
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNational Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom; Wolfson Brain Imaging...RecruitingCervical Spondylosis With Myelopathy | Degenerative Cervical MyelopathyUnited Kingdom
-
Royal College of Surgeons, IrelandNot yet recruitingDegenerative Cervical MyelopathyIreland
-
Medical College of WisconsinMarquette University; North Carolina State UniversityCompletedDegenerative Cervical MyelopathyUnited States
-
Wayne State UniversityUnknownCervical Spondylosis With Myelopathy | Cervical Spine Degenerative Disease NosUnited States
-
Sohag UniversityActive, not recruitingDegenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM)Egypt
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkCompletedDysphagia | Cervical Disc Herniation | Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease | Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy | Osteoarthritis of Cervical Spine
-
Zuyderland Medisch CentrumMaastricht University Medical CenterCompletedDegenerative Disc Disease | Cervical Radiculopathy | Cervical Myelopathy | Adjacent Segment DiseaseNetherlands
-
Mayo ClinicWithdrawnSpinal Stenosis | Cervical Myelopathy | Degenerative Spinal Arthritis
-
University of UtahCompletedSpinal Cord Injury | Cervical Spondylosis With Myelopathy | Degenerative DisorderUnited States
Clinical Trials on Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation
-
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical CenterRecruitingOrthostatic HypotensionUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoCongressionally Directed Medical Research ProgramsRecruitingAcute Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) | Acute Spinal Cord Injury of Traumatic Origin (tSCI)United States
-
Ruijin HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
University of British ColumbiaProvidence Health & Services; International Spinal Research Trust; International...RecruitingSexual Dysfunction, Physiological | Spinal Cord Injuries | Neurogenic Bowel | Neurogenic Bladder | Spinal Cord StimulationCanada
-
University of Mississippi Medical CenterMethodist Rehabilitation CenterRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Spasticity, MuscleUnited States
-
NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeUniversity of Glasgow; The Queen Elizabeth HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
University of British ColumbiaPraxis Spinal Cord InstituteRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Neurogenic Bowel | Neurogenic BladderCanada
-
Institut GuttmannRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Gait Disorders, Neurologic | Motor Function; Retardation | Non Invasive Spinal Stimulation | Stimulation CharecteristicSpain
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityNot yet recruitingNeurogenic Bowel | Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUnknown