Stimulation-based Therapy to Improve Balance in DCM (STIM-DCM)

December 19, 2025 updated by: Aditya Vedantam, Medical College of Wisconsin

Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation to Improve Postural Stability After Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if a treatment called transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), when combined with balance training, can help improve balance in adults who have had surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). DCM is a condition that affects the spinal cord in the neck and often causes problems with walking and balance, even after surgery.

This study will also look at how tSCS affects the nervous system and whether it is safe and practical to use in this group of patients. The results will help researchers plan a larger study in the future.

Main Questions:

  • Does tSCS combined with balance training improve balance more than balance training alone?
  • Does stimulation at both the neck and mid-back work better than stimulation at the mid-back only?
  • What changes in nerve and muscle activity occur with tSCS?

What will happen in this study:

  • Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups:

    1. tSCS applied to the mid-back (thoracic area) plus balance training
    2. tSCS applied to both the neck and mid-back (combined stimulation) plus balance training
    3. Sham stimulation (electrodes placed but no stimulation) plus balance training
  • All participants will complete 12 sessions over 4 weeks (3 sessions per week).
  • Each session will include 30 minutes of balance training and 30 minutes of walking exercises.
  • Participants will receive stimulation or sham treatment during these sessions.
  • Balance and walking tests will be done before and after the program.
  • Nerve and muscle activity will also be measured at the same time points.

This pilot study will help determine if tSCS is effective and safe, and will provide information needed to design a larger trial.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

45

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • DCM participants who have undergone surgery for DCM more than 12 months prior and report persistent impaired imbalance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disease, legal blindness, unstable medical condition that can interfere with the study, breakdown in skin area that will come into contact with electrodes, active implanted medical device, pregnancy, and seizures
  • concurrent occupational or physical therapy during study participation for any condition
  • history of inability to tolerate MEP/SSEP for any reason, or complete paralysis of the legs (lower limb mJOA=0)
  • cognitive impairment and unable to give consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Thoracic tSCS + balance training
This intervention combines noninvasive thoracic transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) with a structured balance training program specifically for adults with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) who have undergone surgical decompression but continue to experience impaired balance.
This intervention combines noninvasive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) with a structured balance training program specifically for adults with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) who have undergone surgical decompression but continue to experience impaired balance. Unlike standard physical therapy or other neuromodulation approaches, this protocol uses targeted stimulation sites and parameters-thoracic-only or combined cervico-thoracic stimulation-delivered concurrently with task-specific balance and gait training to enhance neuromotor recovery. The stimulation is applied using a Chattanooga Vectra device at tolerable intensity, integrated into 12 sessions over 4 weeks. This design uniquely addresses persistent postural instability in post-surgical DCM.
Structured balance and gait training will be performed for the participant.
Active Comparator: Combined cervical and thoracic tSCS + balance training
This intervention combines noninvasive combined cervical and thoracic transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) with a structured balance training program specifically for adults with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) who have undergone surgical decompression but continue to experience impaired balance.
This intervention combines noninvasive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) with a structured balance training program specifically for adults with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) who have undergone surgical decompression but continue to experience impaired balance. Unlike standard physical therapy or other neuromodulation approaches, this protocol uses targeted stimulation sites and parameters-thoracic-only or combined cervico-thoracic stimulation-delivered concurrently with task-specific balance and gait training to enhance neuromotor recovery. The stimulation is applied using a Chattanooga Vectra device at tolerable intensity, integrated into 12 sessions over 4 weeks. This design uniquely addresses persistent postural instability in post-surgical DCM.
Structured balance and gait training will be performed for the participant.
Sham Comparator: Sham tSCS + balance training
This intervention combines sham transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) with a structured balance training program specifically for adults with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) who have undergone surgical decompression but continue to experience impaired balance.
Structured balance and gait training will be performed for the participant.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
The Berg Balance Scale is a validated clinical measure of static and dynamic balance.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude in the quadriceps of either leg
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude recorded from the quadriceps to assess changes in corticospinal excitability when comparing combined cervico-thoracic tSCS versus thoracic-only tSCS.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Center of pressure (CoP) path length and mean velocity during the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration for Balance (mCTSIB) with eyes closed on firm and foam surfaces
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Total displacement of the center of pressure during quiet standing with eyes closed on firm and foam surfaces, reflecting postural sway magnitude.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Sensory Organization Test (SOT) - Somatosensory and Vestibular Score
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Quantifies reliance on somatosensory and vestibular input for balance under altered sensory conditions.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Single-Leg Stance Time
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Duration of stable single-leg standing, assessing unilateral static balance capacity.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Performance-based measure of dynamic balance during complex walking tasks.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
6-Meter Walk Test Gait Speed
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Average walking speed over a short distance, reflecting functional mobility and gait efficiency.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Time required to stand, walk, turn, and sit, capturing functional mobility and fall risk.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Responder Status (MCID Achievement)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Proportion of participants achieving a minimum clinically important improvement in predefined outcomes.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) Score
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Clinician-rated measure of neurological function in cervical myelopathy.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Patient-reported measure of neck-related functional disability.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Patient-reported pain intensity for neck, arm, leg, and device-related pain on a 0-10 scale.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
SF-36 Physical Component Score (PCS)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Generic health-related quality-of-life measure focused on physical functioning.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Clinician-rated assessment of overall change in patient condition.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Patient-reported perception of overall improvement or worsening.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Fall Frequency
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Number of self-reported falls recorded prospectively in a fall diary.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse and serious adverse events.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Lower-Extremity Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP) Latencies
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Cortical response latencies following peripheral stimulation, reflecting integrity and conduction efficiency of ascending somatosensory pathways.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) - Tibialis Anterior and Abductor Pollicis Brevis
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Evoked motor responses assessing corticospinal tract excitability and conduction to the lower extremities.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Surface EMG Amplitude - Tibialis Anterior and Quadriceps
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks
Magnitude of muscle activation during stimulation, indexing neuromuscular recruitment of ankle dorsiflexors and knee extensors.
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 23, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this study will not be shared publicly. De-identified data may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding investigator, subject to approval by the institutional review board and execution of a data use agreement.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

De-identified individual participant data will be available after publication of the primary results and for up a particular duration thereafter. This time period will be determine by the IRB and data use agreement.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

De-identified individual participant data and supporting documentation (including the study protocol and statistical analysis plan) will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request. Requests must include a methodologically sound research proposal and will be reviewed by the study investigators. Access will be granted following institutional review board approval, as applicable, and execution of a data use agreement. Data will be provided through a secure data-sharing mechanism.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Clinical Trials on Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Subscribe