Rehab in Mild Stable DCM: Feasibility RCT Comparing Structured Rehabilitation to Clinical Surveillance (RehabmildDCM)

January 13, 2025 updated by: Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland

Rehab in Mild DCM: Study Protocol for a Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of a Structured Rehabilitation Intervention to Clinical Surveillance in People With Mild Stable Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

The goal of this feasibility RCT is to establish the feasibility of undertaking a RCT investigating the effectiveness of a multi component structured rehabilitation intervention aiming at reducing physical disability in people with mild stable Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. The main question it will answer are what is the incidence of mild stable DCM in the neurosurgical OPD clinics, what is the eligibility rate and participate rate of those eligible. It will also investigate the acceptability of the intervention to both participants and clinicians and participant retention.

Researchers will compare a structured rehabilitation intervention to clinical surveillance. The structured rehabilitation intervention will include education, a physical activity behavioural change intervention, cervical range of motion exercises, neck, upper limb and scapular strengthening exercises and task specific hand function training.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Diagnosis of DCM (Clinical symptom of DCM +/- Upper motor neuron sign + imaging evidence of cervical cord compression). Diagnosis will be confirmed by a consultant neurosurgeon (19).

    • Modified Japanese Orthopaedic assessment (mJOA) score of 15-17, indicating mild DCM. The mJOA is a clinician administered validated measure of DCM severity (20)
    • Adequate comprehension of English to understand the purpose of the study and give written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient or surgeon preference for urgent surgical decompression for progressive DCM, motor radiculopathy or severe unrelenting radicular arm pain or significant risk factors for progression including co-existing cervical radiculopathy and circumferential cord compression.

    • Diagnosis of other neurological condition that could confound assessment.
    • Involvement in another clinical study or trial
    • Pregnancy
    • If the participant is unable to commit to a 12-week programme of up to 10 sessions of supervised rehabilitation and participating in a regular home exercise programme for the duration of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Structured rehabilitation intervention
The SRI will include education, a physical activity behavioural change intervention, cervical range of motion exercises, neck, upper limb and scapular strengthening exercises and task specific hand function training.
Participants will be prescribed a multi-component SRI which will include education, cervical range of motion exercises, progressive neck strengthening exercises, individualised scapular and upper limb strengthening, task specific hand function training and a physical activity behavioural change intervention. The TIDieR checklist has been used to provide a comprehensive description of this complex intervention. (17).
Active Comparator: Clinical surveillance
Participants assigned to the clinical surveillance control group will be invited to attend a single, one to one education session which will be supplemented with a written patient information booklet after which they will be scheduled for a 12 week follow up.
Participants assigned to the clinical surveillance control group will be invited to attend a single, one to one education session which will be supplemented with a written patient information booklet after which they will be scheduled for a 12 week follow up.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of mild stable DCM
Time Frame: Baseline
Number of people with mild stable DCM during the study period/ number of NP seen.
Baseline
Number of people with mild stable DCM who are willing to participate but do not reach the eligibility criteria
Time Frame: Baseline
The number of people with mild stable DCM over the study period- the number of people with mild stable DCM who are eligible to participate in the study.
Baseline
Participant recruitment rate
Time Frame: Baseline
The number of participants recruited per month
Baseline
Participant adherence to the intervention
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The number of scheduled sessions attended by the participants.
12 weeks
Clinician adherence to the intervention
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The number of core intervention components included in each treatment session
12 weeks
Acceptability of the intervention to the participants and clinicians
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Semi-structured interviews
12 weeks
Burden of measurement tool completion
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Semi structured interview
12 weeks
Participant retention rate
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Loss to follow up rate and reasons for loss to follow up
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical component score of the short form (SF) 36
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Physical functioning
Baseline and 12 weeks
Modified Japanese Orthopaedic association index (mJOA)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Myelopathy severity scale
Baseline and 12 weeks
Neck disability index
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Neck pain related disability
Baseline and 12 weeks
Spinal adverse events severity scale
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Adverse events
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ciaran Bolger, MD PhD, Royal College of Surgeons

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 13, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Clinical Trials on Structured rehabilitation intervention

Subscribe