Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study on the Safety and Performance of Ennovate® Cervical (CERISE)

February 16, 2024 updated by: Aesculap AG

Multicenter Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study on the Safety and Performance of Ennovate® Cervical - a Prospective Study on Total Indications

Multicenter Post market clinical follow-up Study on the Safety and Performance of Ennovate® Cervical - Prospective, pure data collection of all Ennovate Cervical patients in Total Indications

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This clinical study is one of the Post market clinical follow-up measures that enables the manufacturer to monitor the clinical safety and performance of the Ennovate® Cervical system. The study enables a quick, but detailed implant documentation, which is of great interest for the current and future users of the internal fixation system targeted in this study. It includes the relevant outcomes to evaluate safety and efficacy of the implant system for various indications in trauma and degenerative disorders.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Hamburg, Germany, 22081
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Schön Klinik Hamburg Eilbek
    • Niedersachsen
      • Meppen, Niedersachsen, Germany, 49716
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Krankenhaus Ludmillenstift Meppen
        • Contact:
          • Felix Kiepe, Dr.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Felix Kiepe, Dr.
    • Sachsen
      • Dresden, Sachsen, Germany, 01076
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Stadtisches Klinikum Dresden
        • Contact:
          • Philip Gierer, Prof. Dr.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gierer, Prof. Dr.
    • Sachsen-Anhalt
      • Halle, Sachsen-Anhalt, Germany, 06112
        • Recruiting
        • Berufsgenossenschaft Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle / Saale
        • Contact:
          • Klaus Röhl, Dr.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Klaus Röhl, Dr.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients treated with the Ennovate® Cervical system in accordance with the indications given in the instructions for use: fractures, degenerative instability, post-trauma instability, tumors, degenerative cervical myelopathy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is minimum 18 years old
  • Informed Consent in the documentation of clinical and radiological results
  • Patient has indication according to Instructions for Use (IFU)
  • Patient is not pregnant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's clear unability or unwillingness to participate in follow-up examinations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Ennovate® Cervical
Alll patients which were treated with the Ennovate® Cervical system in accordance with the indications given in the instructions for use
The Ennovate® Cervical Spinal System is a posterior stabilization for the cervical and upper-thoracic spine. The implants are used for the posterior monosegmental and multisegmental stabilization of the occipitocervical junction and of the cervical and upper thoracic spine.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Pain
Time Frame: preoperatively, at 3 months postoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively
Pain will be assessed by the patient using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) which states "0" at one end representing "no pain" and "100" at the opposite end representing "maximal/worst pain".
preoperatively, at 3 months postoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Quality of life
Time Frame: preoperatively, at 3 months postoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively
In order to analyze the quality of life of the patients, the 5-dimension 5-level score of EuroQol Group (EQ-5D-5L) is used. The score is self-completed by the patient. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.
preoperatively, at 3 months postoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively
Change of Neurological status
Time Frame: preoperatively, at 3 months postoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively
The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) myelopathy score is a disease-specific and physician oriented system that mainly assesses the neurological status of the patient and enables surgeons to compare the changes in the neurological status of the patient before and after certain treatments. However, the JOA score does not include patients' satisfaction, disability, handicaps, or general health (physical and mental health), which can be affected by cervical myelopathy.
preoperatively, at 3 months postoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively
Change of Disability
Time Frame: preoperatively, at 3 months postoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively
The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is designed to measure neck-specific disability. The questionnaire has 10 items to measure patient-reported disability secondary to neck pain and activities of daily living including personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work status, driving, sleeping and recreation and patients rate their status from 0 (best) to 5 (worst imaginable). Individual item responses are summed to a total score, where 0 points indicate no activity limitations and 50 points indicate complete activity limitation.
preoperatively, at 3 months postoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively
Bone fusion
Time Frame: at final follow-up 12 months postoperatively
After cervical stabilization fusion of the treated segment is aspired in most cases. The fusion status can be determined from radiographs (static or dynamic). Bony fusion can be characterized quantitatively by the fusion rate.
at final follow-up 12 months postoperatively
Cumulative number of side effects
Time Frame: throughout the follow-up up to 12 months postoperatively
Occurrence of complications potentially associated with the implanted devices can never be fully excluded during spinal surgery. In order to monitor potential complication and to identify so far unknown complications Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events deemed related to the investigational device are recorded.
throughout the follow-up up to 12 months postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 21, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Disc Disease

Clinical Trials on posterior stabilization for the cervical spine

3
Subscribe